(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 20 October 22 >

October 21[edit]

File:Podostroma cornu-damae.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podostroma cornu-damae.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
I managed to get in contact with the author. He granted permission in the email to me. As he is unfamiliar with licensing, I'd like to do for him. What should I do? --Sateros (talk) 08:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded the file to Commons under the same filename and now "ORTS pending". Please delete this previous version, thank you. --Sateros (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:AMIR.gif[edit]

File:AMIR.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:AMO.jpg[edit]

File:AMO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Was being used on the users userpage as a promotion for their company (also their username) Inactive user, only contribution were this image and links to their company website. Possibly a work for hire via the summary which states this was created by "Evonne Heyning for AMO Studio, Amoration" Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMODA-DigitalShowcase2006.jpg[edit]

File:AMODA-DigitalShowcase2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:SpinPublicity.jpg[edit]

File:SpinPublicity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:NukeThemAll-April.jpg[edit]

File:NukeThemAll-April.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Bawlsmints.jpg[edit]

File:Bawlsmints.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Katie O'Donnell.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katie O'Donnell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Originally tagged as "no source" since it was missing essential source information. Low rez, high quality photo uploaded by an user who has uploaded copyvio images tagged as PD-self. No way to verify validity of license. Mosmof (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:1Gulf_Logo_avi3_svg.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1Gulf Logo avi3 svg.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

May have added wrong lic. tag, Imaged traced Orignl. through PhotoshopCS/MS paint/Inkscape Dancaffey (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:CelebrationHug2010.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CelebrationHug2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Gulf_Helo_Logo787.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gulf Helo Logo787.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

May have added wrong lic. tag, Imaged traced Orignl. through PhotoshopCS/MS paint/Inkscape Dancaffey (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:CuevaDeLaOllaDiorama.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ancheta Wis (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CuevaDeLaOllaDiorama.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Although claimed as self for this photo, there isn't enough evidence presented that the work showin is out of copyright. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The diorama depicts a huge storage container, the original of which is shown in Deutsch Wikipedia. However that picture doesn't clearly show the scale of the pot (Olla). So the diorama with the Indian climbing a ladder set on the Olla is better for showing the scale of the pot. The photo from Deutsch wikipedia could be used in the article on an El Paso museum, but it doesn't give the sense of the museum, or the idea that the Olla is a huge scaled-up version of a family-sized grain container. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 11:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Shall I delete my photo and substitute a GFDL of the real Olla? --Ancheta Wis (talk) 11:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    If you can show me how to use the Wikimedia Commons source for this Olla in the article I would appreciate it. I used the techniques which I have learned on English Wikipedia, and have never used a Commons image. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 12:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Provided there is no name clash just use the name of the Commons image and proceed as you would for an image hosted locally.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:KeltechBW2.jpg[edit]

File:KeltechBW2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I see no evidence that Mogse2 hold the copyright this image. The source and date are missing. He supplies no information as to how he came about this image. Additionally, Mogse2 has a history of uploading image he doesn’t own. This image dose not contain any metadata which would help to suggest that this contributor photographed it. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 12:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acp profile2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Actually, they're two different images, but the uploader has a history of mistagging as "self" while crediting another person. May be recreated with OTRS permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acp profile2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • User has uploaded two different photos of this person, both with different "photo by" credits, and claims to hold the copyright on both. This seems extremely unlikely. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:DMK Rising Sun.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: free use. I'm sorry, I originally tagged this as fair use without noticing there was further discussion elsewhere. It appears that Wikiality has created a generic image of a rising sun. The party logo is not this specific image, but a generic image of the rising sun. Evidently everyone has been talking past each other and this was never imparted. This is too generic to be copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DMK Rising Sun.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The original uploader (User:Wikiality123) claimed self creation and release of rights under a free license. Given that this is the logo of a political party in India, and not the work of the uploader, I retagged the image as non-free [1]. I've been reverted [2], with the editor claiming party logos are not copyrighted in India (but with no presentation of law that indicates this). I reverted [3], asking the editor to prove it and submit same to m:OTRS. The editor reverted [4], saying I had to prove it was copyrighted. Discussion has ensued on the image's talk page. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator seem to have no understanding on what a party electoral symbol India is and how it differs from a court of arms or logo of an organisation. I had already requested the user to take this issue to clarify it on India discussion page, but instead the user had gracious found time to go through all my file uploads and nominate them for deletion. So it is rather not surprising at all that the user did not find time to post a line on India discussion page. So as to assist the nominator I have posted the message on the India discussion page here. --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikiality does not seem to understand that whether or not an electoral symbol differs from a coat of arms or logo of an organization is completely irrelevant. The issue is whether or not the symbol is a creative work or not. India, where this and the related images were created, observes the Berne convention. As I noted to Wikiality [5], the Copyright Office of the Government of India acknowledges that copyright is conferred upon creation (see question 4 answer). The fact that it is an electoral symbol has absolutely no relevance. It is a creative work. That's what matters. Once created, it immediately attracts copyright and that can not be waived by the uploader. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MDMK Top.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep per above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MDMK Top.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
Please see above and here. --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Bobby Cox Manager.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobby Cox Manager.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Tineye indicates 6 different sources for this image. BrokenSphereMsg me 16:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Are you sure that they aren't copying us? I did some playing around with TinEye with some of my own images, and it has certainly latched onto Wikipedia and shows where our images have been reused online. I also checked the various sources for the image that TinEye provided, and I don't see anything that would indicate that it was a definitive original source for the image. Therefore, I see no reason not to assume good faith on this one and believe that the license is indeed correct and the image is actually free. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The lack of camera metadata info was one of the flags for this image. Also it doesn't look like this was uploaded properly as I found it on Flickr here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/therubberduckie/1120472175/. BrokenSphereMsg me 18:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yea the flicker link confirms this is a copyvio Delete Secret account 17:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:JERSEY 2 2000.jpg[edit]

File:JERSEY 2 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:The Saturdays 16.7.10.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Saturdays 16.7.10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The user has previous upload issues that were deleted as false claims of ownership, uploader has been requested on their talk page to provide evidence for ownership and has failed to reply. See User_talk:SitDownOnIt - uploader was requested three weeks ago to provide evidence of ownership and made a comment and then has ceased to edit. Myself and two other users on the talkpage doubt ownership and without clarification, there are multiple uploads listed on their talkpage, all the images should be deleted, none of them have metadata and they look like screenshots to me. I am unsure the way to go, but I would like to deal with all the files here in the one discussion. Off2riorob (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The rest of the files should be nominated when this file is deleted. Fixer23 (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I'm not sure it's a screenshot but the low resolution and lack of metadata worries me. I suppose it is possible that somehow when reducing the size of the image, the metadata was lost, but the fact that the uploader seems unwilling to provide the originals also seems suspicious. AnemoneProjectors 20:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Demi Lovato the Bamboozle 2009,jpg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demi Lovato the Bamboozle 2009,jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The same file from this user was deleted a couple of weeks ago. Fixer23 (talk) 02:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Metro station sandstone.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metro station sandstone.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_21&oldid=1073715208"