Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Please review Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request. Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right. More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.
Hello. I've been frequently reverting vandalistic edits manually for quite some time now. Making a request for the 'Rollbacker' flag. Thank you. Gpkp (u • t • c)14:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done@Gpkp: Please ensure that you are only using this for obvious vandalism; if you need to save an edit summary, use a different tool. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 08:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to use rollback right in enwiki. Now I revert vandalism with the help of twinkle by recent changes patrol. But I thinks using huggle and igloo is more effective than twinkle. So I like to use rollback right. I have practice with counter vandalism with twinkle. Thank you. PATH SLOPU (Talk)11:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Path slopu: You seem to spend a lot of time warning vandals hours after the edits have already been reverted, and in some instances, adding a duplicate warning after they have already been warned, e.g. [3][4][5]. In these cases, I feel the warning may not have been necessary. Do you think you could explain your workflow here? Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mz7:Hi greetings, I reverted vandalism with twinkle in several times. Sometimes if vandalism has already reverted, I had placed warning templates if warnings is not done. I also reported some frequent vandals in WP:AIV. I used duplicate warnings in sometimes. But I stopped it, when I got advises from experienced vandal fighters and AIV administrators. Now I only revert vandalism and also give warnings in user talk page. Thank you.PATH SLOPU (Talk)05:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One of the major things I do on Wikipedia, aside from finding and filling in missing citations and making other improvements, is finding and fighting vandalism. Using Twinkle, I have learned how to accurately identify unconstructive edits and with constructive guidance from more experienced editors (and admittedly a small bump in the road) I have been very careful in doing this. Having rollback would allow me to streamline my activities and contribute more on the anti-vandalism front, which would be a benefit to the project. Thank you for your consideration. Sakaimover (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 14:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Done @Gpkp: Please ensure that you are only using this for obvious vandalism; if you need to save an edit summary, use a different tool. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 08:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Not done because of indefblock (see user's talkpage). GABgab 00:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
