Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music: Difference between revisions
→Request for Review: new section |
OneClickArchived "User script to detect unreliable sources" to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music/Archive 5 |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Blessing,<br /> |
Blessing,<br /> |
||
Laurent [[User:Franky-68|Franky-68]] |
Laurent [[User:Franky-68|Franky-68]] |
||
== User script to detect unreliable sources == |
|||
{{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}} |
|||
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to [[WP:URS|unreliable sources]] and [[predatory journal]]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the [[Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts|39th most imported script on Wikipedia]]. The idea is that it takes something like |
|||
*John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>) |
|||
and turns it into something like |
|||
* John Smith "{{highlight|[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]|pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. |
|||
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}. |
|||
The script is mostly based on [[WP:RSPSOURCES]], [[WP:NPPSG]] and [[WP:CITEWATCH]] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. |
|||
Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at [[User:Headbomb/unreliable]]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at [[User talk:Headbomb/unreliable]]. |
|||
-  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> |
|||
<span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> |
|||
== Good article reassessment for [[Sanctus Real]] == |
== Good article reassessment for [[Sanctus Real]] == |
||
Revision as of 04:47, 6 July 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Christian music and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
|
 | Christian music Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Goals
Hello,
I am really like to help you with translation in French of your articles for the French Christian community.
I am already translating the article about Plus One.
Blessing,
Laurent Franky-68
Good article reassessment for Sanctus Real
Sanctus Real has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for David L. Cook
David L. Cook has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 18:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Request for Review
Hello,
Please I’d love to ask for help as regards a draft I created Emmanuel Iren
Many thanks as I await your response. Mevoelo (talk) 02:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)