User talk:Bondegezou: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:43, 2 October 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Bondegezou, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 21:38, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia survey

Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 01:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Sinclair

I added to your information about John Sinclair at Jill Sinclair. His bio often includes a reference to the fact that he 'is the producer of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" and "Queen - Bohemian Rhapsody".' [1] Do you know anything about that? Rabbi-m 02:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not. He played on the second Buggles album, Adventures in Modern Recording,[2] but I don't know much more about him. Bondegezou 11:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

Can you put in a comment/citation about Yes´ number ones on the Bill Bruford page? Thanks. andreasegde 00:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain it's particularly relevant on the Bruford page, but the band's UK and US chart history is recorded on their Wikipedia page: Tales from Topographic Oceans and Going for the One were both UK #1s. Bondegezou 11:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canterbury Sound

Would you consider a category "Canterbury sound" useful? Best regards, --BNutzer 21:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be a very good idea, yes! Bondegezou 16:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So be it: Category:Canterbury sound! Cheers, --BNutzer 23:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update

In the description of the Category:Canterbury sound, I would like to see mentioned that quite a few of the bands/musicians are still active today, but I am not sure how to put that into english words properly, maybe you could add a (sub-)sentence saying so? Cheers, BNutzer 12:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caravan of Dreams (band)

Maybe you can add some info (like the first line-up with Mark Hewins)? Cheers, --BNutzer 16:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got a bit carried away and added a whole section on predecessor band Going Going (and created a re-direct from Going Going)! Thanks for your work on some of the other Canterbury scene articles. Bondegezou 10:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Etheridge

Hi, I have just added him (and a few basic sources links) to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Jazz#Requested_articles, so, if you're interested, hurry up before someone else does it ;) Cheers, BNutzer 20:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jazz#Category:Jazz_fusion_groups_has_been_created

BNutzer 07:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Susanne Lewis

A tag has been placed on Susanne Lewis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Missvain 05:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Foley Scandal

Please note that I have just nominated Mark Foley Scandal for Featured Article status. You can find comments about its nomination here. I am leaving this message because you have significantly contributed to the article. Thesmothete 02:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Current Events Barnstar
		With thanks for your many contributions to Liberal Democrats leadership election, 2006 at the start of the year. Timrollpickering 19:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see what talk page?

You wrote in your edit summary - [3] - see Talk page but you did not write anything in Talk:Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 were you referring to another talk page? Thanks. // Laughing Man 15:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the discussion there under the subheading "Voting in Kosovo?" Bondegezou 15:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still do not see any comments by you there in that section. What is the basis for your edits? // Laughing Man 16:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to other people's comments there; not my own. This does not seem like a contentious issue to me, but I'll look for some good citations in due course. You can also try asking the discussants on the Talk page for some citations. In the mean time, I've inserted a "citation needed" tag, which seems the best way forward. Bondegezou 16:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My issue is that I feel like adding this, without giving the background on to why the voters are not registered is also misleading, and should be noted. In any case, I will try to find some time to work on the article and find sources and expand upon what you have added. Thanks. // Laughing Man 16:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Wallace (drummer)

Without wanting to revert to and fro, isn't reputable ("having a good reputation; "a reputable business"; "a reputable scientist"; "a reputable wine" [4]) more appropriate than reputed (commonly put forth or accepted as true on inconclusive grounds; "the foundling's putative father"; "the reputed (or purported) author of the book"; "the supposed date of birth" [5]) to describe Wallace's substantial and substantiated career as a session musician? AllyD 23:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Reputable" sounds very odd to me in this context (it feels as if it is contrast to "disreputable", which seems the wrong point to be making). "Reputed" can be a near synonym of "reputable" or "respectable"[6] and sounds better to me. Arguably, either word falls foul of Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. The list of people with whom he worked speaks for itself, so I'm going to remove "reputed" and leave it bare, but feel free to change it as you wish. Bondegezou 10:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I bestow upon you this "Tireless Contributor Barnstar" for your edits in articles about progressive rock Quoth nevermore 13:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hello. You may be interested in joining WikiProject King Crimson, covering articles related to the music group King Crimson. Please visit the project page.

--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FTAB

The reference you stated did not support the claim, certainly does. If you will look on the right side of the page in the caption, you will note it states, "Some of the Aggie band's maneuvers are so complex that some drill-charting software says that the drills are impossible because they require multiple people to be in the same place at the same time." As such, I have added it back. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, mea culpa—I missed the picture caption. Bondegezou 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Del Palmer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Del Palmer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Del Palmer (second nomination). Thank you. -- WebHamster 10:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UK Centre for Excellence

I'd be all for you adding that article, and then we create the disambig. But disambig pages are only for when we have more than one article that can point to the same title. It doesn't include external link disambigs - we aren't a web directory, after all. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biota (band)

Thank you for the compliment! I'll certainly have a look at Biota. --Bruce1ee 15:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great start you've made on the article. I've made a few adjustments myself and added a little, but there's not much info that I can find on them. Please check the members in the infobox, I'm not sure if I've got that right. --Bruce1ee 08:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy policy

Do not identify editors' real life identities. Ever. Fys. Ta fys aym. 16:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your identity is already identified on Wikipedia; that's how I figured it out. I did not identify you in my comments. I did give some details about you that seemed pertinent: I apologise if these are too revealing of your identity -- I didn't think they would be. Bondegezou 16:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a fairly obvious case of harassment using my real life identity, bogus application of irrelevant policies, and rehashing dead and unconnected issues to try to cause harm to me. I am under no editing sanction. You should not have done it and you should apologise. Fys. Ta fys aym. 10:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 Do not identify editors' real life identities. Ever. [[User:Fys|Fys]]. &#147;[[User:Fys|Ta]] [[Special:Contributions/Fys|fys]] [[User talk:Fys|aym]]&#148;. 16:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 :Your identity is already identified on Wikipedia; that's how I figured it out. I did not identify you in my comments. I did give some details about you that seemed pertinent: I apologise if these are too revealing of your identity -- I didn't think they would be. [[User:Bondegezou|Bondegezou]] 16:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
+::It is a fairly obvious case of [[WP:HARASS|harassment]] using my real life identity, bogus application of irrelevant policies, and rehashing dead and unconnected issues to try to cause harm to me. I am under no editing sanction. You should not have done it and you should apologise. [[User:Fys|Fys]]. &#147;[[User:Fys|Ta]] [[Special:Contributions/Fys|fys]] [[User talk:Fys|aym]]&#148;. 10:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)