(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

User talk:Hbanm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hbanm (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 55: Line 55:
::@[[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]] [[ User : Cosmology dreamer ]] 09:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]] [[ User : Cosmology dreamer ]] 09:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:::First of all not a single edit of yours have source, and do you even know meaning of sectarian bias? Vishnu is considered as ultimate reality only in Vaishnavism not in all sects then why are you adding that in Infobox? Wikipedia is a neutral platform. And regarding Vishvarupa its just a form of Vishnu, Infobox is for important information.If you want to edit neutrally do it with reliable third party sources not primary sources and gain consensus on talk page. And stop messaging me unnecessarily explaining your biased edits. [[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]] ([[User talk:Hbanm#top|talk]]) 10:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:::First of all not a single edit of yours have source, and do you even know meaning of sectarian bias? Vishnu is considered as ultimate reality only in Vaishnavism not in all sects then why are you adding that in Infobox? Wikipedia is a neutral platform. And regarding Vishvarupa its just a form of Vishnu, Infobox is for important information.If you want to edit neutrally do it with reliable third party sources not primary sources and gain consensus on talk page. And stop messaging me unnecessarily explaining your biased edits. [[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]] ([[User talk:Hbanm#top|talk]]) 10:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
::::it is necessary added vishvarupa to affiliation,
::::when added Nataraja (cosmic dancer) to shiva, i added only per source, atleast revert or add a Vishvarupa to vishnu.
::::Its imporatant theological source to vishnu and in vaishnavism, i made so much work for creating wiki new account in first time, without talking you remove the imp word, very pain for me, Nataraja is very simular to deity shiva, like wise vishvarupa is important to add to affiliation for vishnu even in vishnu wiki page never describe about vishnurupa,
::::when whole bhagavd gita and mahbharata says about supreme form of vishnu, i.e, vishvarupa (universal being).
::::Revert or add that important word “Vishvarupa” to affiliation
::::Kindly request from hari bhakta
::::@[[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]]
::::I kindly request to you, plz add this word, i never edit wiki in any sectarian bias. [[ User : Cosmology dreamer ]] 11:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Can you plz shut up, i follow wiki rules and
::::i add necessary info based on wikipedia neutral point, not from sectarian bias, dont test my patience, i am vishnu bhakt, i m right to edit page, you have no right delete my edit, only extended confirmed user can reverted on my edits, plz stop ,dont target me. This is last warning for you.
::::@[[User:Hbanm|Hbanm]] [[ User : Cosmology dreamer ]] 14:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

== Comment. ==

Before reverted , plz read what i mention the source, entire article page describes about vishnu only, not other deities if vishvarupa not exclusively to vishnu, then I will add this word name in main info , dont again distrub me, while in shiva wiki page it add Nataraja (Cosmic dancer) to shiva, similarly i add to vishvarupa to vishnu, dont again revert me, even wiki gave chance for me but you ppls didnt accept it, why ? what the reason , when i remove extra word in shiva wiki you add word , but i will add related name to vishnu, you removed it. what a irony, i add only as per source, i didnt edit vandalism, plz understand me... plz add [[ User : Cosmology dreamer ]] 08:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:11, 16 June 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Hbanm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Shiva did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Adakiko (talk) 01:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Chronikhiles. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits seemed less than neutral and have been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chronikhiles (talk) 14:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Chronikhiles. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chronikhiles (talk) 07:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Citing sources before you proceed with further editing on this website. Chronikhiles (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm GMH Melbourne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bakshi Ka Talab have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not unconstructive edit,I reverted my own edit so that can revert previous edit done by anonymous user who vandalised the article. Hbanm (talk) 12:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hbanm: That was oversight on my part. I am so sorry ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment.

What is the word you mentioned, didnt understant me, I first time create wiki to contributes Hindu deities as authentic information in equally, i especially interested in science. If you think this was a mistake, then plz oppolize me, dont comment ugly. User : Cosmology dreamer 09:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not a sock then that word was not for you and you shouldn't feel offended and if you took it on yourself and this is the first time you have created account then I am sorry for using hard language,please don't vandalise pages by removing sourced information and without gaining any consensus on the talk page. Hbanm (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
im devotee of vishnu, Im right to add in wiki, i never add sectarian bias, i also auto confirmed user, you have no rights deleted my edits, i never and didnt edit any vandalism. I edit only as per source, there is no need for consensus, before reverted, first check what i added word and its source.
why you targeted on me, i add only reliable source. First check it. Vishvarupa is theological form and affiliation to vishnu, but why you remove it.
@Hbanm User : Cosmology dreamer 09:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First of all not a single edit of yours have source, and do you even know meaning of sectarian bias? Vishnu is considered as ultimate reality only in Vaishnavism not in all sects then why are you adding that in Infobox? Wikipedia is a neutral platform. And regarding Vishvarupa its just a form of Vishnu, Infobox is for important information.If you want to edit neutrally do it with reliable third party sources not primary sources and gain consensus on talk page. And stop messaging me unnecessarily explaining your biased edits. Hbanm (talk) 10:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it is necessary added vishvarupa to affiliation,
when added Nataraja (cosmic dancer) to shiva, i added only per source, atleast revert or add a Vishvarupa to vishnu.
Its imporatant theological source to vishnu and in vaishnavism, i made so much work for creating wiki new account in first time, without talking you remove the imp word, very pain for me, Nataraja is very simular to deity shiva, like wise vishvarupa is important to add to affiliation for vishnu even in vishnu wiki page never describe about vishnurupa,
when whole bhagavd gita and mahbharata says about supreme form of vishnu, i.e, vishvarupa (universal being).
Revert or add that important word “Vishvarupa” to affiliation
Kindly request from hari bhakta
@Hbanm
I kindly request to you, plz add this word, i never edit wiki in any sectarian bias. User : Cosmology dreamer 11:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you plz shut up, i follow wiki rules and
i add necessary info based on wikipedia neutral point, not from sectarian bias, dont test my patience, i am vishnu bhakt, i m right to edit page, you have no right delete my edit, only extended confirmed user can reverted on my edits, plz stop ,dont target me. This is last warning for you.
@Hbanm User : Cosmology dreamer 14:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment.

Before reverted , plz read what i mention the source, entire article page describes about vishnu only, not other deities if vishvarupa not exclusively to vishnu, then I will add this word name in main info , dont again distrub me, while in shiva wiki page it add Nataraja (Cosmic dancer) to shiva, similarly i add to vishvarupa to vishnu, dont again revert me, even wiki gave chance for me but you ppls didnt accept it, why ? what the reason , when i remove extra word in shiva wiki you add word , but i will add related name to vishnu, you removed it. what a irony, i add only as per source, i didnt edit vandalism, plz understand me... plz add User : Cosmology dreamer 08:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]