(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

User:Quarl/Threaded discussion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
〈new〉box, using header wording from User talk:Cryptic
 
new text
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate" style="{{divstylegreen}}">
<div class="boilerplate" style="{{divstylegreen}}">
<center>'''Fragmented discussions are a pain.'''</center>
<center>'''Fragmented discussions are a pain.'''</center>
Interpersonal communication does not work when messages are left on individual users' talk pages rather than threaded, especially when a third party wishes to read or reply.


If you and I are communicating, I will arbitrarily choose to thread messages on either your talk page or mine to aggregate messages on. If the conversation is about an article I will try to aggregate on the article's talk page.

*If the conversation is on your talk page or an article talk page, I will "watch" it.

*If the conversation is on my talk page or an article talk page and I think that you may not be watching it, I will link to it in a note on your talk page, or in the edit summary of an empty edit.
<i>&mdash;[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup></i>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 04:07, 3 February 2006

Fragmented discussions are a pain.

Interpersonal communication does not work when messages are left on individual users' talk pages rather than threaded, especially when a third party wishes to read or reply.

If you and I are communicating, I will arbitrarily choose to thread messages on either your talk page or mine to aggregate messages on. If the conversation is about an article I will try to aggregate on the article's talk page.

  • If the conversation is on your talk page or an article talk page, I will "watch" it.
  • If the conversation is on my talk page or an article talk page and I think that you may not be watching it, I will link to it in a note on your talk page, or in the edit summary of an empty edit.

Quarl (talk)