TOP500: Difference between revisions
Dsfarcturus (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| align="center"|6.271<br>7.779 |
| align="center"|6.271<br>7.779 |
||
| ''[[Swiss National Supercomputing Centre#Current computing facilities|Piz Daint]]'' |
| ''[[Swiss National Supercomputing Centre#Current computing facilities|Piz Daint]]'' |
||
| '''[[ |
| '''[[Cray XC30]]'''<br>[[Sandy Bridge-E|Xeon E5–2670]] + [[Nvidia Tesla|Tesla K20X]], Aries |
||
| align="center"|[[Cray|Cray Inc.]] |
| align="center"|[[Cray|Cray Inc.]] |
||
| [[Swiss National Supercomputing Centre]]<br> {{SWI}}, 2013 |
| [[Swiss National Supercomputing Centre]]<br> {{SWI}}, 2013 |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
| align="center"|3.144<br>4.881 |
| align="center"|3.144<br>4.881 |
||
| |
| |
||
| '''[[ |
| '''[[Cray XC30]]'''<br>[[Sandy Bridge-E|Xeon E5–2697v2]], Aries |
||
| align="center"|[[Cray|Cray Inc.]] |
| align="center"|[[Cray|Cray Inc.]] |
||
| {{USA}}, 2013/2014 |
| {{USA}}, 2013/2014 |
Revision as of 04:13, 24 June 2014
The TOP500 project ranks and details the 500 most powerful (non-distributed) computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the International Supercomputing Conference in June, and the second one is presented in November at the ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference. The project aims to provide a reliable basis for tracking and detecting trends in high-performance computing and bases rankings on HPL,[1] a portable implementation of the high-performance LINPACK benchmark written in Fortran for distributed-memory computers.
The TOP500 list is compiled by Hans Meuer of the University of Mannheim, Germany, Jack Dongarra of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Erich Strohmaier and Horst Simon of NERSC/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
History
In the early 1990s, a new definition of supercomputer was needed to produce meaningful statistics. After experimenting with metrics based on processor count in 1992, the idea was born at the University of Mannheim to use a detailed listing of installed systems as the basis. Early 1993 Jack Dongarra was persuaded to join the project with his LINPACK benchmark. A first test version was produced in May 1993, partially based on data available on the Internet, including the following sources:[2][3]
- "List of the World's Most Powerful Computing Sites" maintained by Gunter Ahrendt[4]
- David Kahaner, the director of the Asian Technology Information Program (ATIP),[5] in 1992 had published a report titled "Kahaner Report on Supercomputer in Japan"[3] which had an immense amount of data.[citation needed]
The information from those sources was used for the first two lists. Since June 1993, the TOP500 is produced bi-annually based on site and vendor submissions only.
Since 1993, performance of the #1 ranked position has steadily grown in agreement with Moore's law, doubling roughly every 14 months. As of June 2013, the fastest system, the Tianhe-2 with Rpeak[6] of 54.9024 PFlop/s, is over 419,102 times faster than the fastest system in November 1993, the Connection Machine CM-5/1024 (1024 cores) with Rpeak of 131.0 GFlop/s.[7]
Architecture and operating systems
As of November 2013[update], TOP500 supercomputers are overwhelmingly based on x86-64 CPUs (Intel EMT64 and AMD AMD64 instruction set architecture), with the RISC-based Power Architecture used by IBM POWER microprocessors, and SPARC making up the remainder. Prior to the ascendance of 32-bit x86 and later 64-bit x86-64 in the early 2000s, a variety of RISC processor families made up the majority of TOP500 supercomputers, including RISC architectures such as SPARC, MIPS, PA-RISC and Alpha.
Top 10 ranking
Legend:
- Rank – Position within the TOP500 ranking. In the TOP500 List table, the computers are ordered first by their Rmax value. In the case of equal performances (Rmax value) for different computers, the order is by Rpeak. For sites that have the same computer, the order is by memory size and then alphabetically.
- Rmax – The highest score measured using the LINPACK benchmark suite. This is the number that is used to rank the computers. Measured in quadrillions of floating point operations per second, i.e. petaflops.
- Rpeak – This is the theoretical peak performance of the system. Measured in Pflops.
- Name – Some supercomputers are unique, at least on its location, and are therefore christened by its owner.
- Computer – The computing platform as it is marketed.
- Processor cores – The number of active processor cores actively used running LINPACK. After this figure is the processor architecture of the cores named. If the interconnect between computing nodes is of interest, it's also included here.
- Vendor – The manufacturer of the platform and hardware.
- Site – The name of the facility operating the supercomputer.
- Country – The country in which the computer is situated.
- Year – The year of installation/last major update.
- Operating system – The operating system that the computer uses.
Other rankings
Top countries
Numbers below represent the number of computers in the TOP500 that are in each of the listed countries.
Country | Jun 2014 | Nov 2013 | Jun 2013 | Nov 2012 | Jun 2012 | Nov 2011 | Jun 2011 | Nov 2010 | Jun 2010 | Nov 2009 | Jun 2009 | Nov 2008 | Jun 2008 | Nov 2007 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | 233 | 264 | 252 | 250 | 252 | 263 | 255 | 276 | 280 | 277 | 291 | 291 | 258 | 284 |
China | 76 | 63 | 66 | 72 | 68 | 74 | 61 | 41 | 25 | 21 | 21 | 15 | 12 | 10 |
United Kingdom | 30 | 23 | 29 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 27 | 24 | 38 | 44 | 43 | 45 | 52 | 47 |
Japan | 30 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 35 | 30 | 26 | 26 | 18 | 16 | 15 | 17 | 22 | 20 |
France | 27 | 22 | 23 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 25 | 29 | 26 | 23 | 26 | 34 | 17 |
Germany | 22 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 26 | 24 | 27 | 30 | 25 | 47 | 31 |
Canada | 9 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
India | 9 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
Korea, South | 8 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Australia | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Switzerland | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
Italy | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 6 |
Russia | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
Netherlands | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | |||
Brazil | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |||
Norway | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
Sweden | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
Belgium | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
Israel | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
Finland | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Poland | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Spain | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
Ireland | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | |||
Denmark | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||
Taiwan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |||
Malaysia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Mexico | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Slovak Republic | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Singapore | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
South Africa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
United Arab Emirates | 1 | |||||||||||||
New Zealand | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 1 | |||||||
Slovenia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Turkey | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Cyprus | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Egypt | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Indonesia | 1 | |||||||||||||
Luxembourg | 1 |
Systems ranked #1 since 1993
- NUDT Tianhe-2A ( China, June 2013 - present)
- Cray Titan ( United States, November 2012 - June 2013)
- IBM Sequoia Blue Gene/Q ( United States, June 2012 – November 2012)
- Fujitsu K computer ( Japan, June 2011 – June 2012)
- NUDT Tianhe-1A ( China, November 2010 – June 2011)
- Cray Jaguar ( United States, November 2009 – November 2010)
- IBM Roadrunner ( United States, June 2008 – November 2009)
- IBM Blue Gene/L ( United States, November 2004 – June 2008)
- NEC Earth Simulator ( Japan, June 2002 – November 2004)
- IBM ASCI White ( United States, November 2000 – June 2002)
- Intel ASCI Red ( United States, June 1997 – November 2000)
- Hitachi CP-PACS ( Japan, November 1996 – June 1997)
- Hitachi SR2201 ( Japan, June 1996 – November 1996)
- Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel ( Japan, November 1994 – June 1996)
- Intel Paragon XP/S140 ( United States, June 1994 – November 1994)
- Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel ( Japan, November 1993 – June 1994)
- TMC CM-5 ( United States, June 1993 – November 1993)
Number of systems
By number of systems as of November 2013:[8]
- Top processor generation
- Intel Xeon E5 (SandyBridge) – 341
- Intel Xeon 5600-series (Nehalem) – 55
- Power BQC – 24
- Opteron 6100-series "Magny-Cours" – 17
- Opteron 6200 Series "Interlagos" – 16
- Top vendors
- Hewlett-Packard – 196
- IBM – 164
- Cray – 47
- Silicon Graphics – 17
- Bull – 14
- Operating system family
Large machines not on the list
A few machines that have not been benchmarked are not eligible for the list: such as NCSA's Blue Waters. Additionally purpose-built machines that are not capable or do not run the benchmark are not included: such as RIKEN MDGRAPE-3.
See also
References
- ^ HPL
- ^ AN INTERVIEW WITH JACK DONGARRA by Alan Beck, editor in chief HPCwire [dead link]
- ^ a b Statistics on Manufacturers and Continents
- ^ List of the World's Most Powerful Computing Sites
- ^ thefreelibrary.com
- ^ Rpeak – This is the theoretical peak performance of the system. Measured in Pflops.
- ^ TOP500 - Sublist Generator
- ^ TOP500 - List Statistics
External links
- Top500.org
- Netlib
- An Overview of High Performance Computing and Challenges for the Future on YouTube – Jack Dongarra discusses the TOP500 benchmark, its history and its trends.