(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP (part 2)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hominin photos violating FoP (part 2)

edit

I had nominated several hominin images for deletion because they could not apply for the country's FoP (or were from countries that did not provide FoP at all) Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP, but it appears I've missed a few. Here are the remaining from what I can see:

Discussion

What is a "fop"? North8000 (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: See Commons:FOP (it stands for Freedom of Panorama). Basically, the artist of a sculpture retains all rights on the work, including derivatives of the sculpture (such as photos). Likewise, the photographer needs permission from the artist to be able to release it under a Commons-applicable license, unless the photo was taken in a country which has Freedom of Panorama laws, which allow the photographer to release a photo of a sculpture under a Commons-applicable license without the permission of the artist of sculpture in specific scenarios. The above images are not applicable for FoP protections in the respective countries they were photographed in, and so cannot be used with a Commons-friendly license Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 04:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunkleosteus77: Thanks for that thorough explanation! North8000 (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted all, possibly no FOP in most countries, but in addition same argument as Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP, ‘’Delete due to artist copyright, doubtful they were all signed over’’. --Elly (talk) 09:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]