Commons:Requests for comment/Technical needs survey/TimedText: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m corr. |
m →Votes: support for 4 and 5 and an ASR and a seamless user interface integration |
||
Line 42:
#yes.--[[User:RZuo|RZuo]] ([[User talk:RZuo|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 12:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
*{{o}} per discussion above: {{s}} addressing general subject and related issues but opposing the particular solutions proposed here at this point (e.g. one can already categorize the files rather than the transcripts). Something that's very much needed is machine transcription and translation which then only need to be checked & edited rather than encouraging huge time sinks in a time of stagnating WMC contributor counts. --[[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
* {{s}} devoting resources to timed text in general. Point 4 and 5 and [[:en:Whisper (speech recognition system)|an ASR]] - well integrated (without me having to open zillions of browser tabs) - appear to be interesting to me. Accessibility requirements might be put in place by legislators like we have seen with GDPR regarding privicy in the past. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''<sup>[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]</sup> 19:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||