This document provides an overview of assessment in special education. It discusses that the primary assumption of assessment is that all children can learn and communicate. The purposes of assessment include screening, eligibility determination, IEP development, instructional planning, and evaluation. Assessment involves both formal and informal methods as well as formative and summative approaches. Test results should be understood in terms of descriptive statistics, stanines, percentile ranks, and developmental scores like age equivalents. Federal law provides provisions regarding nondiscriminatory and valid assessment practices. The document reviews understanding assessment results and defines levels of performance.
The document discusses assessment for students with special needs. It defines assessment as collecting information about students to make educational decisions. Classroom assessment can help teachers identify student strengths and weaknesses, monitor learning, and plan instruction. Students are assessed during scheduled screening periods using standardized tests to identify those who may need additional support. The types of assessments for students with special needs include norm-referenced tests, criterion-referenced tests, adaptive tests, process-oriented tests, and ecologically-based assessments. The document provides strategies teachers can use to help students with specific difficulties like problems with reading, writing, math, and attention.
Assessing students with learning disabilities YethGu Luchavez
The document discusses strategies for assessing students with learning disabilities. It describes several assessment strategies that can be used instead of or in addition to traditional paper/pencil tests, including presentations, conferences, interviews, observations, performance tasks, and self-assessments. These alternative assessment methods take pressure off written tasks and allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in other ways. The document emphasizes that the goal of assessment is to provide opportunities for students to show their understanding.
842014 I come not to bury summative assessments but to prais.docxevonnehoggarth79783
8/4/2014 I come not to bury summative assessments but to praise them | The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
http://edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-watch/2012/i-come-not-to-bury-summative-assessments-but-to-praise-them.html# 1/3
I come not to bury summative assessments but to
praise them
Kathleen Porter-Magee (/about-us/fordham-staff/kathleen-porter-magee)
February 10, 2012
The Northwest Evaluation Association recently surveyed parents and teachers
(http://www.nwea.org/sites/www.nwea.org/files/PressReleaseAssessmentPerceptions.pdf) to
gauge their support for various types of
assessm ent. The
results (http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/08/21tests.h31.html) indicated that just a quarter of
teachers find sum m ative
assessm ents “‘extrem ely’ or ‘very’ valuable for determ ining whether students
have a deep understanding of content.” By contrast, 67 percent of teachers (and
85 percent of parents) found form ative and interim assessm ents extrem ely or
very valuable.
I can understand why teachers would find form ative and
interim assessm ents appealing. After all, teachers generally either create those
assessm ents them selves, or are at least intim ately involved with their
creation. And they are, therefore, m ore flexible tools that can be tweaked
depending on, for instance, the pace of classroom instruction.
But, while form ative and interim assessm ents are
critically im portant and should be used to guide instruction and planning, they
cannot and should not be used to replace sum m ative assessm ents, which play an
equally critical role in a standards-driven system .
http://edexcellence.net/blog-types/common-core-watch
http://edexcellence.net/about-us/fordham-staff/kathleen-porter-magee
http://www.nwea.org/sites/www.nwea.org/files/PressReleaseAssessmentPerceptions.pdf
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/08/21tests.h31.html
8/4/2014 I come not to bury summative assessments but to praise them | The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
http://edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-watch/2012/i-come-not-to-bury-summative-assessments-but-to-praise-them.html# 2/3
Formative and
interim assessments
cannot and should
not be used to
replace summative
assessments.
Everyone has a
Sum m ative assessm ents are designed to evaluate whether
students have m astered knowledge and skills at a particular point in tim e. For
instance, a teacher m ight give a sum m ative assessm ent at the end of a unit to
determ ine whether students have learned what they needed to in order to m ove
forward.
Sim ilarly, and end-of-course or end-of-year sum m ative assessm ent can help
determ ine whether students m astered the content and skills outlined in a
state’s standards for that grade.
If you believe that we need standards to ensure that all
students—regardless of their zip code or socioeconom ic status—need to learn
the
sam e essential content and be held to the sam e .
The document examines whether NAPLAN test results provide a fair and accurate assessment of student learning ability. It explores known facts about NAPLAN, as well as confusions and contradictions. Evidence from a teacher survey and classroom observation suggest NAPLAN does not adequately assess all students and has negatively impacted teaching practices. However, a resolution proposes that teachers can reduce test pressure, use results to help learning, and remember NAPLAN's purpose is to assess students, not rank schools or teachers. While issues remain, NAPLAN data may still benefit students if its role in the classroom is de-emphasized.
This document discusses informal assessment in language learning. It begins by defining informal assessment as a way of collecting student performance information in normal classroom conditions, without test conditions. It is done systematically over time through observation. The document notes that clear criteria are needed for assessment and feedback should be provided. It discusses assessing both linguistic and non-linguistic factors informally. Specific guidance is provided on informally assessing speaking, writing, and listening skills.
The document discusses key aspects of Response to Intervention (RTI) and how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can be involved. It outlines the tiers of intervention in RTI from universal screening to increasingly intensive supports. SLPs are encouraged to participate in universal screenings, collaborate on intervention teams, and use data to inform instruction for all students. The goal of RTI is to provide evidence-based, systematic interventions to students struggling in the general education setting before considering special education.
This document provides information about intelligence tests, mental retardation, and special education assessments. It discusses the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, which was the first intelligence test developed in 1905. It also discusses standard deviations and IQ scores in relation to defining mental retardation. The document contains questions about norm-referenced measures, criterion-referenced testing, individualized education programs, and the purposes and practices of assessment in special education.
This document provides information about intelligence tests, mental retardation, and special education assessments. It discusses the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, which was the first intelligence test developed in 1905. It also discusses standard deviations and IQ scores in relation to defining mental retardation. Several questions are asked about assessment purposes, procedures, and interpreting results.
12 Crazy Alternatives To Letter Grades In Education | Future Education MagazineFuture Education Magazine
The fundamental purpose of the Alternatives to letter grades in education is to inform students and their families of their performance, but this cannot be accomplished with only one sign.
Is it possible to explain why the student outputs is as they are through an assessment of the processes which they did in order to arrive at the final product?
YES, through Process oriented, performance-based assessment
The document describes the development of a typical 6-year-old child. Physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially they are gaining more independence but still learning. They can count to 10, understand time concepts, and express themselves well through language. Socially, they enjoy friendships and team activities. Their fine motor skills allow them to dress themselves and write letters and numbers. They enjoy reading, drawing, games, and collecting things.
The document discusses various principles and types of assessment. It describes norm-referenced tests, which compare students to a sample group, and criterion-referenced tests, which measure performance against a standard. It also distinguishes between survey tests, which provide an overview of skills, and diagnostic tests, which assess specific areas in more depth. Dynamic assessment is discussed as a way to determine a student's potential through assisted testing and trial teaching. The purpose of assessment should be to improve instruction and determine optimal learning circumstances for students.
This document discusses the importance of conducting observational assessments in early childhood education. Observational assessments provide valuable information about what children know and how they learn in their natural environment. This type of informal assessment is important for guiding instruction, evaluating curriculum, and monitoring child progress. The document reviews different methods for conducting observational assessments, such as using rubrics, checklists, portfolios, and documenting observations through notes, photos, and videos. It emphasizes assessing children within the context of daily activities and routines.
The document discusses various tools used for evaluation in education. It begins by defining evaluation and differentiating between quantitative and qualitative evaluation. It then describes different written, oral, and performance-based evaluation techniques. Specific tools covered include essays, objective tests like MCQs, observations, rating scales, aptitude tests, and methods for evaluating cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes. The document provides details on the purpose, types, advantages, and limitations of many of these evaluation tools.
Test instruction behaviour, observationnazar hussain
This document discusses various methods for evaluating adult education, including tests, observations, and portfolios. It emphasizes that evaluation is an important part of the teaching and learning process to assess outcomes. Classroom tests and observations are highlighted as valuable evaluation tools. Tests can motivate learning, direct study, and provide valid measures of achievement when administered under controlled conditions. Observations, both spontaneous and planned, can also provide useful information about students when properly recorded. Evaluations should utilize multiple methods and be used to both assess students and improve instruction.
The document summarizes psychometric assessments used by the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation in their scholarship selection process. It discusses tests of emotional intelligence (BarOn EQ), aptitude (DAT), interests (MBI, CIP), and personality (MBTI) to identify learners who will excel academically, benefit from opportunities, and cope in challenging environments. Scores are used to recommend interventions like workshops and career counseling. The goal is providing information to support learners' career choices and subject selections based on their individual profiles.
This document discusses school-based assessment (SBA) and the importance of assessing learning in a holistic manner. It provides examples of exercises from an EVS textbook that aim to relate classroom learning to students' real-life experiences. Some exercises can be used for written, oral, or school-based assessments, while others that assess skills like creating art from local materials may require alternative assessment strategies. The document emphasizes that assessing students based on their own experiences allows for multiple responses and deeper understanding compared to questions that can be answered through rote memorization. Overall, SBA is presented as a more effective approach than centralized exams for obtaining a comprehensive view of each child's learning.
This research-oriented presentation summarizes current best practices in grading, emphasizes why these practices are essential (especially for ELLs), and provides recommendations for teachers to help them avoid common pitfalls in grading while adopting policies and procedures that will increase motivation and encourage academic success in their ELLs.
Language proficiency assessment oral language
Language proficiency or linguistic proficiency is the ability of an individual to speak or perform in an acquired language.
Standardized tests are administered consistently to large groups of students to allow for comparisons across wide geographical areas. They typically consist of multiple choice and true/false questions. While they aim to be objective, standardized tests also have disadvantages. They may not accurately reflect a student's knowledge and can encourage cheating. They also assume all students have similar educational backgrounds.
Similar to w3s1 Introduction to Assessments.pptx (20)
Understanding and Interpreting Teachers’ TPACK for Teaching Multimodalities i...Neny Isharyanti
Presented as a plenary session in iTELL 2024 in Salatiga on 4 July 2024.
The plenary focuses on understanding and intepreting relevant TPACK competence for teachers to be adept in teaching multimodality in the digital age. It juxtaposes the results of research on multimodality with its contextual implementation in the teaching of English subject in the Indonesian Emancipated Curriculum.
How to Install Theme in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
With Odoo, we can select from a wide selection of attractive themes. Many excellent ones are free to use, while some require payment. Putting an Odoo theme in the Odoo module directory on our server, downloading the theme, and then installing it is a simple process.
How to Store Data on the Odoo 17 WebsiteCeline George
Here we are going to discuss how to store data in Odoo 17 Website.
It includes defining a model with few fields in it. Add demo data into the model using data directory. Also using a controller, pass the values into the template while rendering it and display the values in the website.
Delegation Inheritance in Odoo 17 and Its Use CasesCeline George
There are 3 types of inheritance in odoo Classical, Extension, and Delegation. Delegation inheritance is used to sink other models to our custom model. And there is no change in the views. This slide will discuss delegation inheritance and its use cases in odoo 17.
Split Shifts From Gantt View in the Odoo 17Celine George
Odoo allows users to split long shifts into multiple segments directly from the Gantt view.Each segment retains details of the original shift, such as employee assignment, start time, end time, and specific tasks or descriptions.
Beginner's Guide to Bypassing Falco Container Runtime Security in Kubernetes ...anjaliinfosec
This presentation, crafted for the Kubernetes Village at BSides Bangalore 2024, delves into the essentials of bypassing Falco, a leading container runtime security solution in Kubernetes. Tailored for beginners, it covers fundamental concepts, practical techniques, and real-world examples to help you understand and navigate Falco's security mechanisms effectively. Ideal for developers, security professionals, and tech enthusiasts eager to enhance their expertise in Kubernetes security and container runtime defenses.
Principles of Roods Approach!!!!!!!.pptxibtesaam huma
Principles of Rood’s Approach
Treatment technique used in physiotherapy for neurological patients which aids them to recover and improve quality of life
Facilitatory techniques
Inhibitory techniques
How to Show Sample Data in Tree and Kanban View in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo 17, sample data serves as a valuable resource for users seeking to familiarize themselves with the functionalities and capabilities of the software prior to integrating their own information. In this slide we are going to discuss about how to show sample data to a tree view and a kanban view.
Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC)- Concept, Features, Elements, Role of advertising in IMC
Advertising: Concept, Features, Evolution of Advertising, Active Participants, Benefits of advertising to Business firms and consumers.
Classification of advertising: Geographic, Media, Target audience and Functions.
6. PRIMARY ASSUMPTION OF ASSESSMENT
6
01
All children can
learn – When
evaluators BELIEVE
that all children
can learn,
assessment takes
the role of finding
strengths rather
than weaknesses.
All children can
communicate –
One important
goal of assessment
should be to
determine HOW
students
communicate. All
behaviors
communicate!
02
Assessment must
be culturally
responsive – When
an assessment
reflects the
perspective of
only one cultural
group, the results
may be biased
against students
from other groups.
03
01
7. PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENTS
7
Screening and
Identification
to screen
children and
identify those
who may be
experiencing
delays or
learning
problems.
Are there
unrecognized
problems?
Eligibility and
Diagnosis
to determine
whether a child
has a disability
and is eligible for
special education
services, and to
diagnose the
specific nature of
the student's
problems or
disability
Does the child
qualify for
special
education?
IEP Development
and Placement
to provide
detailed
information so that
an Individualized
Education Program
(IEP) may be
developed and
appropriate
decisions may be
made about the
child's educational
placement
Is the child
making
progress on
their goals?
Instructional
Planning
to develop
and plan
instruction
appropriate
to the child's
special
needs
Is the student
making adequate
progress toward
state standards
of learning?
Evaluation
to evaluate
student
progress.
Is the current
program
working?
8. DEFINITION OF ASSESSMENT
An assessment in special education is the process used to determine a child’s specific learning strengths and
needs, and to determine whether or not a child is eligible for special education services. Assessment in
special education is a process that involves collecting information about a student for the purpose of
making decisions. Assessment, also known as evaluation, can be seen as a problem-solving process
(Swanson & Watson, 1989) that involves many ways of collecting information about the student. According
to Gearheart and Gearheart (1990; cited in Pietrangelo and Giuliani, 2006), assessment is “a process
that involves the systematic collection and interpretation of a wide variety
of information on which to base instructional/intervention decisions and,
when appropriate, classification and placement decisions. Assessment is
primarily a problem-solving process”
8
9. 9
Formal Informal Formative Summative Direct Indirect
Administered in
a highly
structured
environment
Requires the
person
administering
the tests to have
training
Allows for
accommodations
Provides Norm-
Referenced
Results
Does not
require
standardized
administration
Provides
Criterion
References
Results
Administered
frequently,
Informs
instructional
practices, and
used to make
decisions about
instruction.
For example,
quizzes
Often used for
IEP progress
monitoring
Administered
at the end of a
learning
sequence (unit
test, EOY ) to
Assesses
multiple skills
learned over a
long period
Administered
by the teacher
to gather
information
about the
individual
Documents
what a student
can and cannot
do.
Gathers
information
from other
sources such as
adults who are
familiar with the
student.
Assessment Categories
10. FEDERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING ASSESSMENT
1. Tests are to be selected and administered so as to be racially and culturally nondiscriminatory.
2. To the extent feasible, students are to be assessed in their native language or primary mode of communication such as
ASL or Communication Boards
3. Tests must have been validated for the specific purpose for which they were used.
4. Tests must be administered by trained personnel in conformance with the instructions provided by the test produces.
5. Tests used with students must include those designed to provide information for specific educational needs, not just
general intelligence quotient.
6. Decisions about students are to be based on more than a single test of their performance
7. Evaluations are to be made by a multidisciplinary team that includes at least one teacher or specialist with knowledge
of the area of suspected disability.
8. Children must be assessed in all areas related to a specific disability including – where appropriate – health, vision,
hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communication skills, and motor skills.
10
11. UNDERSTANDING ASSESSMENT RESULTS
11
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ARE CALCULATED USING BASIC MATHEMATICAL
OPERATIONS (ADDITION, SUBTRACTION, MULTIPLICATION, AND DIVISION), AS WELL AS,
SIMPLE EXPONENTIAL OPERATIONS
(SQUARES AND SQUARE ROOTS).
ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE OF
MATHEMATICS IS NOT REQUIRED!
13. STANINES
Short for “standard nines”,
stanine scores are standard-
score bands that divide a
distribution into nine parts.
13
14. PERCENTILE RANK
Percentile Ranks indicate the
percentage of people whose
scores are at or below a
given raw score. It is NOT
the same as the percentage
correct.
14
15. DEVELOPMENTAL SCORES
• AGE EQUIVALENT = The child’s raw score is the average performance for that
age group. For example, if your 6-year-old child has an age equivalent score of
10.0 it means their score is the same as the average score for all 10-year-olds
taking the test. It does not mean they are mentally 10 years old.
• GRADE EQUIVALENT = The child’s raw score is the average performance for
that grade level. For example, if your 5th-grade child obtains a grade-
equivalent score of 10.5 in math, it means that they can solve 5th-grade math
problems as well as the average 10th-grade student. They are performing
better than the average 5th grade but most likely cannot perform as well as a
10th grader on 10th-grade material. 15
16. HOT UPDATE! = PERCENTAGE CORRECT
16
Instructional
Level
85-95%
Frustration
Level
85% or less
Independent
Level
95%+
17. IEP
PERCENTAGES
OF ACCURACY
LEVELS
17
Frustration Level
The student knows less than 85% of the material
and feels frustrated when attempting the task.
Instructional Level
The student can successfully complete the task with 85-95%
accuracy. The task provides a degree of challenge where
the student is likely to be successful, but success is not
guaranteed.
Independent Level
The student can perform 95% or more of the task
without assistance and experiences little frustration.
18. LOOKING FORWARD
• READ: MORNINGSTAR CHAPTER 3 DUE 2/2/23
• ASSESSMENT PRESENTATIONS BEGIN 2/16/23
*NOTE CHANGE IN CANVAS!!!
• ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT – PSYCHO-
EDUCATIONAL REPORT DUE 3/5/23
18
Editor's Notes
Norm reference = Standardized tests – compare test takers in relation to other test takers. (SAT/ACT or IQ tests). But for young kids, can be used to determine things like Kindergarten readiness.
Criterion-Referenced = typically assess against a set of standards to determine the knowledge and abilities gained by a student. (AP Exams)