Deborah Gersh, Data in Value- Based Health Care
•
1 like•349 views
This document discusses the challenges of reconciling data sharing and privacy protections in value-based health care. It notes that while electronic health records and other technologies are critical for value-based health care, interoperability and data quality issues remain. Ensuring effective data use while respecting individual privacy rights is difficult given the current legal and operational frameworks. The document explores some approaches like trusted exchange frameworks and care integration networks, but concludes these still require balancing the data needs of value-based care with patients' privacy interests.
Report
Share
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Deborah Gersh, Data in Value- Based Health Care
Similar to Deborah Gersh, Data in Value- Based Health Care (20)
More from The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics
More from The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Deborah Gersh, Data in Value- Based Health Care
- 1. 1 March 2, 2018 DATA IN VALUE-BASED HEALTH CARE Reconciling Data Sharing and Privacy Protections
- 2. 2 Challenges INTEROPERABILITY QUALITY OF DATA EFFECTIVE USE OF DATA INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY RIGHTS CHALLENGES
- 3. 3 VBHC data challenges IT support critical for Value-based Health Care (“VBHC”) – Major investments in Electronic Health Records (“EHRs”), but have not met expectations – Supporting VBHC Initiatives – Need to build for 2020 and beyond Grappling with the interoperability millstone – legal and operational challenges Seeking high quality data: rethinking the way we organize and support the collection, management and use of the data – Capturing and structuring data to support the shift to greater provider accountability
- 4. 4 Quality of data Data not effectively captured or measured Need for: – Effective sharing of data with integrated care team – Use of data for benchmarking purposes – Support for evidenced-based care planning – Support for Clinically Integrated Networks (“CINs”), Risk-bearing Organizations (“RBOs”), Health Information Exchanges (“HIEs”)
- 5. 5 Diabetes as example Range of clinical and supplemental needs Pre-admission / screening In hospital care Post acute care Physical Therapy Diet and exercise Patient Engagement through technology Ancillary Support Services
- 6. 6 Privacy protections – the counterpoint Strong public policy preference: protecting patient privacy and data-use rights The conflict: desire to have benefits of big data but reluctance to share personal health information Fragmentation of these protections – Like EHRs, patient privacy protections built around the legacy fee-for-service health care structure and patient consents and authorizations
- 7. 7 Array of data-use rights & privacy protections Legal hurdles – Authorizations and consents Non-“treatment” uses and data aggregation Patient compensation for data; blockchain technology? Coordination of consents and authorizations across the care team Authorization of future, unforeseen uses (de-identification, “blanket” consents) Effective data security State-specific privacy laws (HIV, mental health, etc.) Ongoing compliance with evolving federal standards – Office for Civil Rights enforcement – Punitive shift in Federal Trade Commission enforcement
- 8. 8 Balancing the values Balancing patient privacy legal protections with the data sharing and aggregation required for VBHC: – Trusted Exchange Framework (“TEFCA”), a partial answer – Pursuant to the 21st Century Cures Act – Attempts to create a single “on-ramp” for provider and others’ data exchange – CINs Difficult to establish Still require substantial resources devoted to privacy – Complex to ascertain needed consents/authorizations Business associate or covered entity status, and when? – New York State Medicaid Health Home program – Broad state-authored consent and authorization – Substantial compliance resources still required
- 9. 9 Balancing the values – HIEs Exchanges of clinical information between disparate health systems Variety of models (e.g., EHR vendors, consumer controlled, geographic based) Still fundamentally rests upon a concept of consents and authorizations – Emerging trends United Health Group – Payor provided data analytics and technology – Supporting Medicare advanced Bundled Payments for Care Improvement model CVS – Aetna – Wellness clinics and pharma services – Community-based hub
- 10. 10 Conclusion The move to VBHC requires harmonizing competing goals: (1) data sharing and aggregation necessary for VBHC (2) the moral and legal imperatives of patient privacy and control