More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Bergson social welfare function(1).pptx
Similar to Bergson social welfare function(1).pptx (20)
More from jaheermuktharkp
More from jaheermuktharkp (12)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Bergson social welfare function(1).pptx
- 2. • The concept of social welfare function was first introduced by Prof. Bergson and later on developed by Samuelson, Tintner and Arrow. • They are of the view that no meaningful propositions can be made in welfare economics without introducing value judgments. • The concept of social welfare is an attempt at providing a scientifically normative study of welfare economics
- 3. • social welfare function shows the factors which the welfare of a society is supposed to depend. • Bergson defines it “as a function either of the welfare of each member of the community or of the quantities of products consumed and services rendered by each member of the community.” • In its original form the Bergson social welfare function is formulated in a completely general manner. • It is a function which establishes a relation between social welfare and all possible variables which affect each individual’s welfare, such as a services and consumption of each individual. It is an ordinal index of society’s welfare and is a function of individual utilities.
- 4. • It is expressed as • W = F (U1,.U2, Un) • where W is the social economic welfare, F is for function, and Ur U2……………… UN is the levels of utilities of 1, 2,…individuals. W is an increasing function of these utilities. • The general properties of the social welfare function are similar to those of an individual utility function. • In particular, the value of the welfare index increases whenever the utility level of one individual is increased without lowering that of the other individual. • Thus the social welfare function is consistent with the Pareto optimality criterion, but it goes much further, since it assigns a value to every economic state, including those which according to the Pareto criterion are regarded as non-comparable. • The existence of a social welfare function, therefore, implies a comparison of the welfare position of the individual members of society.
- 5. • Assumptions: • (a) It assumes that social welfare depends on each individual’s wealth and income and each individual’s welfare depends, in turn, on his wealth and income and on the distribution of welfare among the members of the society. • (h) It assumes the presence of external economies and diseconomies with their consequent effects. • (c) It is based on ordinal ranking of combinations of those variables which influence individual welfare. • (d) Interpersonal comparisons of utility involving value judgments are freely permissible
- 7. Criticism • (1) Not Applicable either to a Totalitarian State or a Democratic One • (2) Construction of Welfare Function Difficult: • (3) Arbitrary and Imaginary • (4) The Concept of “Maximum ‘ without any Empirical Significance • (5) Contradictory Results • (6) Not Helpful in Solving Problems