Haryana has experienced strong economic growth and productivity gains in recent years. It has the highest per capita GDP and private wages in India, growing at over 8% annually between 2008-2011. Manufacturing, especially automotive and textiles, are leading industries, though services now contribute nearly half of its GDP. To sustain its competitiveness, Haryana must continue improving infrastructure, education, and developing new industry clusters through cooperation between private businesses and government.
Bihar is categorized as a "Factor Driven Economy" with per capita income less than $400. It has the lowest microeconomic competitiveness rank of all states at 1. While Bihar has low GDP growth compared to India as a whole, its growth rate is rising. Creating a clear economic strategy that engages stakeholders is important for achieving fiscal stability and enhancing the state's competitiveness during times of austerity.
Sikkim faces economic challenges in achieving fiscal stability and enhancing competitiveness. It has a per capita GDP of less than $400, categorizing its economy as factor-driven. Agriculture contributes around 18% of Sikkim's GDP, while services and industry contribute 48% and 34% respectively. Sikkim needs to focus on improving competitiveness by developing strong industry clusters, enhancing skills training, and investing in infrastructure to promote productivity and economic growth.
Arunachal Pradesh has huge potential for hydropower generation due to its abundant rivers and hilly terrain. The state currently has an installed hydropower capacity of 97.57 MW but over 100 projects with a total potential capacity of 47,000 MW are planned for the next ten years. Arunachal Pradesh also has a thriving carpet making industry and receives international recognition for its creative carpet designs. The state benefits from infrastructure projects under the Non-Lapsable Central Pool of Resources and a new railway line connecting the capital region to other parts of India is expected to be operational by 2018.
1) Maharashtra ranks 2nd among states in the "Innovation Driven Economies" category based on per capita income between 900-1300 USD.
2) The document discusses state competitiveness rankings and categories states based on their per capita income and economic development stage. Maharashtra is considered to have a productive and prosperous economy that is rising compared to the national average.
3) Key factors for state competitiveness include per capita GDP, economic growth rates, and rankings on education, infrastructure, governance and business climate. Maharashtra performs well on these measures and aims to further enhance its competitiveness.
Haryana is a state in Northern India with Chandigarh as its capital. It was formed in 1966 when the former state of Punjab was divided. Agriculture, especially crops like rice, wheat and sugarcane, forms the mainstay of Haryana's economy. Industries are also well developed due to its proximity to Delhi. The state has a rich cultural heritage that includes folk music and dances like Ghoomar.
The document discusses economic challenges and competitiveness for the state of Karnataka in India. It provides information on 3 key areas: 1) Achieving fiscal stability through enhancing state competitiveness, which is important for job growth and incomes. 2) A hierarchy for measuring state competitiveness through major pillars, sub-indices, and indicators. 3) Stages of economic development that states fall into based on per capita GDP, ranging from factor-driven to innovation-driven economies. Karnataka is categorized as an investment-driven economy.
Jharkhand was carved out of Bihar in 2000, with Ranchi as its capital. It has 24 districts and Hindi as its official language. Statehood came after a long struggle by Adivasi communities seeking recognition outside the caste hierarchy. Some popular festivals celebrated in Jharkhand include Sarhul, Chhath Puja, and Kunda Mela. Major industries include TISCO, HECL Ranchi, and BSL Bokaro.
Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh, Industries in Andhra Pradesh, GSDPBruce Clay India
Andhra Pradesh is located in Southern India with a coastline of 974 km. The document provides an overview of the state's economy and key industries. It highlights that Andhra Pradesh has emerged as a hub for knowledge-based industries like IT, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology. The state offers various fiscal and policy incentives for business under its industrial promotion policy. Additionally, Andhra Pradesh has high-quality infrastructure and a skilled workforce, contributing to its high economic growth rate of 16% between 2004-2005 and 2011-2012. The primary industries in the state are agriculture and rice is a major crop.
The rivers of Karnataka can be divided into those flowing east towards the Bay of Bengal like the Cauvery, Krishna, Pennar, and Palar, and those flowing west like the Sharavathi, Kali, Bedti, and Netravathi. The Cauvery is the most important river, originating in Kodagu district and flowing 380 km through Karnataka before joining the Bay of Bengal. Karnataka also has many waterfalls, with Jog Falls being the highest plunge waterfall in India at 293 meters. Irrigation is important for agriculture as rainfall is not consistent, with around 26.2% of land currently under irrigation facilities including wells, canals, and tanks. Karnataka's rivers have also been
Manipur, as the name suggests, is a land of jewels. It is one of the “7 Sisters”of North-Eastern India. Its rich cultural heritage in martial arts, dance, theatre and sculpture has endured the test of time. Enjoy the charming beauty of Manipur with Theotherhome.com.
Haryana is a state located in northern India between 27°39' to 30°35' N latitude and 74°28' and 77°36' E longitude. It has four main geographical features - the Yamuna-Ghaggar plain, Shivalik Hills, semi-desert sandy plain, and Aravalli Range. The state has a hot summer and cold winter climate with monsoon rains from July to September. Major rivers include the Yamuna, Ghaggar, and Markanda. Flora includes thorny shrubs and deciduous forests, and fauna includes black buck, nilgai, and various birds.
This document discusses state competitiveness in India. It analyzes the economic challenges facing chief ministers in 2012, including achieving fiscal stability and enhancing state competitiveness. It categorizes states based on their per capita GDP into six stages of economic development. It also ranks states based on a state competitiveness index and analyzes their near term prosperity performance based on GDP per capita growth rates from 2008-2011.
Recent development in indian politics (pol science)Nikhil Dhawan
As for democracy as practiced in India, Arundhati Roy said: 'While there is some amount of democracy in India there has not been a single day since independence when the state has not deployed the armed forces to quash insurgencies within its boundaries. The numbers of people who have been killed and tortured are incredible. It is a state which is continuously at war with its own people. If you look what is happening in places like Chhattisgarh and Odisha it will be an insult to call it a democracy'.
Ms Roy further believes 'that elections have become a massive corporate project and the media is owned and operated by the same corporations too'. She opines that "some amount of democracy in India is reserved for its middle classes alone and through thatthey are co-opted by the state and become loyal consumers of the state narrative'.
These Notes will give the answers to all the questions that are consisted in the Chapter of Class XII, Political Science. These notes are prepared specially with great care and much attention has been given to the content while writing. All the questions that are explained in these notes are well explained and advanced attention has been given to the content.
You can download the file directly from here also www.notesshare.in or mail me = nikdhawan@outlook.com
After independence, the Indian National Congress, the party of Mohandas K. Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, ruled India under the leadership first of Nehru and then his daughter (Indira Gandhi) and grandson (Rajiv Gandhi), with the exception of brief periods in the 1970s and 1980s, during a short period in 1996, and the period from 1998-2004, when a coalition led by the Bharatiya Janata Party governed.
Sikkim is a state in northeast India that borders China, Bhutan, Nepal, and West Bengal. It has a diverse range of flora and fauna due to its varying altitudes, including over 5,000 flowering plants and 16 conifer species. Red panda is the state animal and blood pheasant is the state bird. Khangchendzonga National Park and Varsey Rhododendron Sanctuary are two protected areas. Agriculture, hydropower production, and conservation of the natural environment are important aspects of Sikkim's economy and culture.
The document discusses economic challenges and competitiveness for the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It outlines three main areas of focus: 1) achieving fiscal stability, 2) enhancing state competitiveness, and 3) measuring state competitiveness through indicators across four pillars and 350 data points. It also categorizes states based on per capita income and analyzes near term prosperity performance for various states from 2008-2011.
Uttar Pradesh is India's fifth largest state by area. Some key facts:
- Capital is Lucknow
- Population of nearly 200 million
- Important cities include Agra, Allahabad, Varanasi, Mathura, and Ayodhya
The document then provides details on the climate, history, and popular tourist destinations in Uttar Pradesh like the Taj Mahal in Agra, Ganges river in Varanasi, and birthplace of Lord Krishna in Mathura. Information is given on famous temples, forts, and how to reach the main cities.
The document provides information on the state of Haryana in India. It highlights that Haryana has a strong economy, growing at a CAGR of 12.12% between 2004-2016. The state is a leading manufacturing hub and food producer. Key sectors driving growth include automobiles, IT, agriculture and food processing. The state government has focused on developing infrastructure like roads, airports and industrial parks to promote business. Haryana also has skilled labor force and the government is establishing educational institutions to develop talent.
er
ty
.in
in food technology, entrepreneurship and management.
al
pr
op
This document announces the approval and notification of a new Industrial and Investment Policy for 2011 in the state of Haryana, superseding the previous 2005 policy. Key highlights of the new policy include a focus on attracting investment in priority sectors like automotive, IT/ITES, textiles and food processing through improved infrastructure and a conducive business environment. It aims to promote private sector participation, employment, and sustainable development through environment-friendly technologies. The policy outlines strategies to achieve these objectives, such as developing infrastructure through public-private partnerships and adopting IT-enabled governance for efficient
Haryana is a leading state in India with a strong economy. Some key points:
- Agriculture is a major contributor to the state's economy, with wheat and rice as top crops. Haryana is known as the "bread basket of India".
- The industrial and service sectors are also strong, with major companies in automotive and IT. Gurgaon and other cities host many national and multinational firms.
- The state government is focused on further developing infrastructure like roads, airports and industrial parks to promote business opportunities in sectors like manufacturing and tourism.
- Haryana has seen strong economic growth in recent years, with the GDP and per capita income rising at compound annual growth rates of over
This document appears to be the Constitution of India. It outlines the framework of the government of India, including the executive, legislative and judicial branches at both the federal and state levels. It establishes India as a sovereign, socialist, secular democratic republic and describes the fundamental rights of citizens and directive principles of state policy. It outlines citizenship rights and the territories of India. It establishes the institutions of parliament, state legislatures, the prime minister, president, governor and their powers. It creates the Supreme Court and high courts and defines their jurisdiction. It also addresses public service commissions, the comptroller and auditor general and local self government.
The document discusses the issue of female foeticide in India and campaigns against sex-selective abortion. It provides horrifying statistics on missing women and crimes against women in India. It discusses cultural biases that promote son preference and myths around sex determination. It calls for policy initiatives, administrative reforms, and legislative reforms to address gender inequality and stop sex-selective practices.
The document summarizes various initiatives taken by the Government of Haryana, India to improve governance through information and communication technology (ICT). Key initiatives include establishing five committees of secretaries for inter-departmental coordination, setting up a Center of Excellence for Good Governance, mandatory IT plans for government organizations, rural citizen service centers, e-governance roadmaps, online services for land records, registration, municipalities, and implementation of mission mode projects. The status of these projects and future plans to strengthen ICT infrastructure and create a comprehensive state portal are also outlined.
Haryana is a state in northern India with the following key details:
- It borders Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
- Chandigarh is its capital and it was formed in 1966. Major languages include Hindi, Punjabi, and Haryanvi.
- There are 21 districts in the state including Gurgaon, Faridabad, Sonipat, and Ambala. Major crops include rice, wheat, and sugarcane.
- The state is known for festivals like Teej and Baishakhi. Important industries include automobile, paper, sugar, and textiles. Literacy rates are among the highest in India
The document discusses several national and state level political parties in India. At the national level it describes the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Indian National Congress (INC), Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and Communist Party of India (CPI). It then briefly outlines some key state level parties including the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) of Delhi, Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) of Haryana and Shiv Sena of Maharashtra. It provides details on the history, ideology and leadership of each party as well as their performance in the most recent national or state elections.
The document discusses several festivals celebrated in India. It describes Lohri as a harvest festival celebrated in January in Punjab and Haryana. Holi is identified as the festival of colors celebrated in various states to mark the arrival of summer. Baisakhi is highlighted as the most important harvest festival in Punjab celebrated in April. Other festivals mentioned include Diwali (festival of lights), Christmas, Eid-ul-Fitr (Muslim festival), Independence Day, and Dussehra. The document encourages celebrating all festivals to spread messages of joy, happiness, and togetherness.
The document summarizes a study on the oral classroom participation of six Korean students in US graduate seminars. It explores the factors influencing their participation and how those factors impact their verbal interaction. The primary factors found to influence participation are: English language ability, sociocultural differences between Korean and US classroom norms, individual differences in content knowledge and personality, and characteristics of the classroom environment like perceptions of teachers and discussion formats. These factors impacted the Korean students' interaction patterns in discussions, including how long they spoke, whether they initiated topics or just responded to questions. While language skills are often cited as the main barrier, the study found participation is influenced by multiple sociocultural and individual factors.
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Dr. Chung is Fight Colorectal Cancer’s 2011 Lisa Fund Research Grant recipient. He is studying the hedgehog pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer.
This document provides information about various study abroad fellowship opportunities for graduate students, including:
- The NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes, which provide an 8-week research experience in countries like China, Japan, and South Korea. The deadline to apply is November 14, 2012.
- The Critical Language Scholarship Program, which offers intensive language instruction and cultural experiences abroad over the summer for less commonly taught languages.
- The Fulbright Research Grant and English Teaching Assistantship, which provide funding for independent research or English teaching abroad for up to 12 months in over 140 countries.
- The Fulbright Public Policy Fellowship for policy-related work in countries like Bangladesh, Haiti, and Thailand.
The document summarizes some key characteristics and features that are commonly found in music videos according to Goodwin's book "Dancing in the Distraction Factory". These include: 1) Demonstrating genre characteristics through elements like stage performances for metal videos and dance routines for boy/girl bands. 2) Having a relationship between the lyrics and visuals, either illustrating, amplifying, or contradicting the lyrics. 3) Having a relationship between the music and visuals where the tone and atmosphere of the visual reflects the music.
These are the slides from my "end-of-fellowship" presentation I gave at the OU on 31 May 2012. They contain the broad brush strokes of very initial findings from my TOUCANS research into UK HEI views on the OERu concept. More detailed findings to follow over the coming month.
The document discusses the role of an architect. It describes that an architect does more than just produce designs. An architect provides guidance and oversight throughout the entire development process, ensuring solutions meet requirements and standards. The architect also communicates regularly with developers, answers questions, and helps resolve issues. An architect is responsible for maintaining design quality, coherence and integrity of the overall system as development progresses.
CA in Haryana India: past experiences and future plans. Ashok K YadavJoanna Hicks
The document summarizes conservation agriculture efforts in Haryana, India. It details the agricultural context of Haryana and increasing crop production over time. It then outlines the government's actions and policies to promote conservation agriculture technologies like laser land leveling, farm machinery, straw management, and direct seeded rice. The document discusses strategies to expand the use of these technologies and bring 50% of cultivated land under conservation agriculture by 2017. It also emphasizes capacity building and improving extension services.
This slide presentation was given as part of the Careers After Biological Science seminar series at the University of Leicester, March 2010.
www.biosciencecareers.wordpress.com
Senior Postdoctoral Research Associate Dr Ruth Saunders gave the following presentation as part of the 2010 Season of Careers After Biological Sciences talks at the University of Leicester, UK.
These slides are from a talk given at the University of Leicester, UK as part of their 2010 season of "Careers After Biological Science" seminars. The speaker, Dr Jannine Clapp was an undergraduate at Leicester then completed a PhD and a first postdoc at the University of Nottingham before returning to Leicester to work in the group of Dr Flav Giorgini. www.biosciencecareers.wordpress.com
Andhra Pradesh has an investment driven economy with strengths in textiles, apparel and processed food clusters. While its productivity and prosperity rankings are high, it faces challenges in enhancing competitiveness. Key priorities include achieving fiscal stability, developing a clear economic strategy to engage stakeholders, and improving the state's competitiveness through productivity growth and innovation. The state has a diversified economy led by services, but agriculture and manufacturing also contribute significantly to its GDP.
West Bengal faces economic challenges in achieving fiscal stability and enhancing competitiveness. The state has an investment-driven economy and is ranked 4th in India on the state competitiveness index. Key sectors include apparel, textiles, metals, and tobacco. While the state has a large population and workforce, its GDP per capita is below the national average due to lower productivity. The services sector contributes over half of GDP, while agriculture and industry each contribute around a fifth. Improving infrastructure, education, and the business environment can help enhance the state's competitiveness.
The document discusses state competitiveness in India. It provides information on categorizing states based on per capita income levels from factor-driven to city states. It also ranks states within each category based on microeconomic competitiveness. Additionally, it shows near term state prosperity performance based on GDP per capita growth rates from 2008-2011, with some states growing highly productively above the national average while others grew lower or rising.
1) Himachal Pradesh has a transition economy with competitiveness rankings in the top third of Indian states.
2) The document analyzes Himachal Pradesh's economic performance across indicators like prosperity, productivity, labor mobilization, and leading industry clusters.
3) It finds that while Himachal Pradesh has high prosperity and productivity rankings, it can improve areas like employment growth and reducing unemployment to remain competitive.
1) The document discusses Goa's economic performance and competitiveness. It analyzes Goa's GDP, productivity, clusters, and the contributions of key sectors like agriculture, industry and services to its economy.
2) Goa ranks highly on prosperity measures like GDP per capita but needs to focus on improving productivity growth. Its economy is investment-driven and dominated by services, manufacturing, and mining/quarrying clusters.
3) Agricultural and manufacturing sectors contribute around 7-8% and 32-33% respectively to Goa's GSDP, with services being the largest contributor at around 40%. Enhancing competitiveness across all sectors through infrastructure and policy reforms is emphasized.
1) Kerala has a per capita GDP of Rs. 59,056, ranking 4th among Indian states, and has experienced steady GDP growth of 6.29% between 2008-2011.
2) Kerala has a highly productive economy, ranking 3rd in GDP per labor participant, but private sector wages have declined relative to the national average.
3) The service sector contributes the largest share (over 60%) to Kerala's GSDP, followed by industry and agriculture, with tourism and related services being major growth sectors.
The document discusses state competitiveness in India. It provides information on three key areas: 1) It categorizes states according to their per capita GDP and economic development stage, ranging from city states to factor driven economies. 2) It ranks states according to their microeconomic competitiveness. 3) It shows states' near term prosperity performance based on their GDP per capita growth rates from 2008-2011, with some states growing highly productively while others were low and declining.
1. The document provides an overview of emerging trends in rural India based on census and survey data.
2. It finds that rural populations remain large but growing more slowly, with two-fifths of villages accounting for four-fifths of the population.
3. Rural markets and incomes are becoming more heterogeneous, with literacy, media exposure, and marketing efforts rising rapidly across regions.
The Geographic Mismatch & A Ranking of Indian States by their Labour Ecosystem (Labour Demand, Labour Supply, Labour Laws)
Background
India’s demographic dividend will increase our population from 1 billion in 2001 to 1.4 billion in 2026. 83% of this increase will be in the 15-59 age group.
If we harness this dividend by 2025, India will not only have 25% of the world’s total workforce but our per capita income will be $ 4100. This will rise to $9802 in 2040 and $20,836 in 2050. This will finally put poverty in the museum, it belongs.
But a demographic dividend does not mean people, but productive people. Converting our people into productive people requires radical reform of our labour market ecosystem that includes labour demand, labour supply, and labour laws.
India’s Three Mismatches
THE GEOGRAPHIC MISMATCH: Much of India’s demographic dividend will occur in states with backward labour market ecosystems. Between 2010 and 2020, the states of UP, Bihar and MP will account for 40% of the increase in 15-59 year olds but only 10% of the increase in income. During the same period, Maharashtra, Gujarat, TN and Andhra will account for 45% of the increase in GDP but less than 20% of the addition to the total workforce.
THE SKILLS / EDUCATION MISMATCH: About 89% of the 15-59 year olds have had no vocational training. Of the 11% who received vocational training, only 1.3% received formal vocational training. The current training capacity is a fraction of the 12.8 million new entrants into the workforce every year.
THE SECTORAL MISMATCH: Most employment opportunities will arise in sectors where people have little experience. The largest component of labour force growth is in rural areas but the most growth in employment is in areas that require greater human capital. Wage inflation projection till 2026 flag skill shortages.
India’s Failed Matching Ecosystem
Our employment exchanges are dysfunctional; they gave about 2 lac jobs to the 4 crore people registered.
The best performing employment exchanges were in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and
Maharashtra but the most new registration are in UP and West Bengal.
The Delhi Government budget shows that it costs the government Rs 228,381 for a single placement.
The employment exchange at Chitradurga in Karnataka has been unable to provide even a single job in the last four years.
India has only 0.25 million apprentices while Germany has 0.6 million, Japan has 2 million.
State Ranking of Labour Ecosystem
OVERALL LABOUR ECOSYSTEM RANKING: Andhra Pradesh tops followed by
Karnataka and Maharashtra. States that made significant improvements since 2005
include Bihar, Assam and J&K (though the last two continue to be below their levels of performance in 1995).
EMPLOYMENT ECOSYSTEM RANKING: Delhi tops followed by Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan. Their ranking is mostly driven by all around infrastructure improvement e.g. the performance of Delhi and Gujarat is driven by power supply, high teledensity and low taxation, relative to the size of economy.
EMPLOYABILITY ECOSYSTEM RANKING: Karnataka tops followed by Delhi and Andhra Pradesh. The large infrastructure in education and professional education is one of the primary causes of Karnataka’s high ranking, which it has further improved on since the 2005 ranking.
LABOUR LAW ECOSYSTEM RANKING: Maharashtra tops followed by Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. Maharashtra not only tops but has improved its performance since 2005 because of better performance in labour relations and average wages relative to minimum wages.
State governments are losing an important opportunity to differentiate themselves with specific reforms to their labour ecosystems. Over the next twenty years, this will be the difference between growth and poverty reduction.
States can take the lead in improving matching infrastructure by reforming employment exchanges, apprenticeship programs, assessment and certification capabilities, etc. This is the lo
Sanjeev_Sanyal_Process_Reforms_The_India_dialog_2024.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Sanjeev Sanyal, Member, EAC – PM, Government of India on "India’s Process Reforms – Fixing the Nuts and Bolts" at #TheIndiaDialog on March 1, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Michael_Green_Social_Progress_The_India_Dialog_2024.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Michael Green, CEO, Social Progress Imperative on "Social Progress of Indian States and Districts" at #TheIndiaDialog on March 1, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
James_Crabtree_The_Billionaire_Raj_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by James Crabtree on "The Billionaire Raj: Inequality in India" at #TheIndiaDialog on March 1, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Anil_Chalamalasetty_New_India_New_Energy_The_India_Dialog_2024.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Anil Chalamalasetty, Founder, Group CEO and MD, Greenko Group on "New Energy for New India" at #TheIndiaDialog on March 1, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Vibhav_Conor_Jyotirlingams_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Vibhav Kapoor, Adjunct Professor, University of Dayton, Ohio and Conor Martin, Independent Artist on "Jyotirlingams" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Veer_Munshi_Visual_Dialog_on_Conflict_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Veer Munshi, Artist on "Visual dialogue on Conflict and Displacement" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Pranjal_Sharma_Inclusive_Growth_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Pranjal Sharma, Economic Analyst, Advisor & Author on "Inclusive Growth" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Pranab_Bardhan_Reflections_on_the_political_Economy_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Pranab Bardhan, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Economics, University of California, Berkeley on "Reflections on Political Economy of New India" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Michael_Enright_India_and_the_world_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Michael Enright, Pierre Choueiri Family Professor in Global Business, Northeastern University on "India and the World" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Arun_Majumdar_Energy_Climate_Sustainability_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Arun Majumdar, Dean, Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability on "Energy, Climate and Sustainability" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Ramesh_Chand_Agriculture_Stanford_Idea_India_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Ramesh Chand,Member NITI Ayog, Government of India on "Role and Place of Agriculture in Meeting Aspirations of Viksit Bharat " at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
Christian_ Ketels_Will_the_Indian_Giant_Emerge_The_India_Dialog_2024.pptxDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Christian Ketels, Senior Advisor, Stockholm School of Economics on "India:Will the giant Emerge" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 29, 2024 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
#TheIndiaDialog looks at inviting the world’s leading experts and intellectuals in the areas of economics, business, policy, social development, science, technology, art and culture to provide their perspectives and foster an understanding of India. There would be a series of keynote addresses, panel discussions, and fireside chats during the dialog.
This document discusses 5 themes: cleanliness & sanitation, health, wellness, water conservation, and sustainable development. It lists these 5 themes but does not provide any further details about them.
Institute for Competitiveness, India is the Indian knot in the global network of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School. Institute for Competitiveness, India is an international initiative centered in India, dedicated to enlarging and purposeful disseminating of the body of research and knowledge on competition and strategy, as pioneered over the last 25 years by Professor Michael Porter of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School. Institute for Competitiveness, India conducts & supports indigenous research; offers academic & executive courses; provides advisory services to the Corporate & the Governments and organises events. The institute studies competition and its implications for company strategy; the competitiveness of nations, regions & cities and thus generate guidelines for businesses and those in governance; and suggests & provides solutions for socio-economic problems.
Presentation done by Steven Vogel, Professor of Political Science and Political Economy, University of California, Berkeley on "Building Human Foundation" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
Stephen_Ezell_Redefining Healthcare_#theindiadialogue Feb 2023.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Stephen Ezell, Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, ITI on "Redefining Healthcare" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
Robert_Eberhert_#theindiadialogue Feb 2023.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Robert Eberhert, Professor, UCLA on "Entrepreneurship and Policy Efforts" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
Presentation done by Mathew Bishop, Senior fellow in the Center for Sustainable Development, Brookings on "Social Progress Index" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
Presentation done by E Somanathan, Fellow, Center for Advanced Studies in Behavioural Sciences, Stanford University on "Enviornmental Progress" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
Arvind_Virmani_India_LMIC_HIC_staanford_2023_feb.pdfDr. Amit Kapoor
Presentation done by Arvind Virmani, Member, NITI Aayog on "India from Middle Income to Developed Country" at #TheIndiaDialog on February 24 at Stanford University. The #TheIndiaDialog was organised by Institute for Competitiveness and US Asia Technology Management Center at Stanford University.
2. ECONOMIC CHALLENGE FOR CHIEF MINISTERS IN 2012
Achieving Fiscal
Stability
Enhancing State
Competitiveness
• Competitiveness is the only way to achieve sustainable job growth, improving
incomes and stable public finances
• Creating a clear economic strategy for the state that engages all stakeholders is
even more important in times of budget cutting and austerity
3. HIERARCHY OF MEASUREMENT OF STATE COMPETITIVENESS INDEX
4 Major
Pillars
12 Sub Indices
350* Indicators
* Approximate figure
4. STAGES OF THE ECONOMY
Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 900 to
City States (Per capita GDP>1300 USD) 1300 USD)
Transition Economies (Per capita GDP 800 to 900 USD)
Investment Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 500 to
800 USD)
Evolving / Changeover Economies (Per capita GDP 400
to 500 USD)
Factor Driven Economies(Per capita GDP < 400 USD)
5. STATES ACCORDING TO CATEGORIZATION
Microeconomic Competitiveness
Categorization
Ranks
City States (Per capita Incomes >1300 USD)
Delhi 1
Goa 2
Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 900 to1300 USD)
Haryana 1
Maharashtra 2
Gujarat 3
Kerala 4
Transition Economies (Per capita Incomes 800 to 900 USD)
Punjab 1
Tamil Nadu 2
Himachal Pradesh 3
Investment Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 500 to 800 USD)
Andhra Pradesh 1
Karnataka 2
Uttarakhand 3
West Bengal 4
Chhattisgarh 5
Sikkim 6
Mizoram 7
Meghalaya 8
Arunachal Pradesh 9
Tripura 10
Evolving/ Changeover Economies (Per capita Incomes 400 to 500 USD)
Rajasthan 1
Jharkhand 2
Orissa 3
Jammu and Kashmir 4
Factor Driven Economies(Per capita Incomes < 500 USD)
Bihar 1
Madhya Pradesh 2
Assam 3
Uttar Pradesh 4
Manipur 5
Nagaland 6
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
6. NEAR TERM STATE PROSPERITY PERFORMANCE
9
Gross Domestic Product per Capita real growth rate, 2008-2011
Haryana
Low but rising versus India Chhattisgarh
Highly Productive and Prosperity
Bihar Rising versus India
Maharashtra
8
Himachal Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Orissa
7 Karnataka Punjab
Sikkim
Uttarakhand
Arunachal Pradesh Kerala
Assam Gujarat
Rajasthan
Tripura
6 Tamil Nadu
West Bengal Goa
Delhi
Points
Index
57.28
Average
All India
Meghalaya
All India GSDP
Jharkhand /Capita rate
Mizoram (CAGR) of 6.27 %
5
Manipur
Madhya Jammu & Kashmir
Pradesh
All India Average
4
Nagaland of 47,998
Low and declining versus India Rupees/capita
High but declining versus India
3
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000
Gross Domestic Product per Capita, 2011
7. COMPETITIVENESS: UNDERLYING CONCEPTS
• Competitiveness is the productivity with which a state utilizes its
human, capital, and natural resources
• Productivity determines wages and the standard of living – Productivity
growth determines sustainable economic growth
• Productivity depends on how a state competes, not what industries it
competes in
• Innovation in products and processes is necessary to drive productivity
growth
• Only productive businesses can create wealth and jobs. States compete to
offer the most productive environment for business
• The public and private sectors play different but interrelated roles in creating
a productive economy
8. HARYANA PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT
Position Trend
Prosperity
Productivity
Labour Mobilization
State of Clusters
Type of Economy Investment Driven Top 33.33% of the
states
33.33%-66.67% of
Agricultural Products the states
Leading Clusters Automotive
Other transportation
66.67% to 100% of
Apparels and textiles the states
9. HARYANA COMPETITIVENESS – OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Prosperity Clusters
Gross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2011 Rank: 1 Total Number of People employed in all Factory sector Rank: 3
• In Haryana Rs. 82,017 • In Haryana 5,84,762
• In India Rs. 47,998 • In India 1,15,06,838
• State Difference to India +70.87%. • State Employment to total
India Employment (factory sector) 5.08%
Growth in Gross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2008-11 , (CAGR) Rank: 1
• In Haryana 8.47%
• In India 6.28%
Productivity Labour Mobilization
Population, 2011 Rank: 4
Gross State Domestic Product per labour force participant, 2011 Rank: 1 • In Haryana 2,53,53,081
• In Haryana Rs 2,00,316 • % of India 2.51%
• In India Rs 1,21,265
• State Difference to India +65.18% Population Growth, GAGR, 2001-2011 Rank: 2
• In Haryana 1.83%
Growth in Gross State Domestic Product Rank: 1 • In India 1.61%
per Labour force participant, 2001-11
• In Haryana 10.43% Employment, 2010 Rank: 4
• In India 8.44% • In Haryana 6115304
• % India 7.31%
Average Private Wage in 2008-09, Rank:2
• In Haryana Rs 72,550 Employment growth, annual rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 2
• In India Rs 64,741 • In Haryana 2.32%
• State Difference to India +12.06% • In India 2.05%
Private Wage Growth, CAGR, 2000-2009 Rank:2 Unemployment, 2010 (Per hundred People) Rank: 4
• In Haryana 5.00% • In Haryana 5.90
• In India 4.53% • In India 9.39
Change in Unemployment rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 4
• In Haryana -24.36
• In India 41.37
10. UNDERSTANDING STATE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
Haryana
250000
GSDP at current price at factor cost in Rupees Crore
209510
200000
202093
182588
150000
154231
130236
100000
106393
93561
82862
72528
65505
50000
58183
51375
0
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
11. WHAT DRIVES STATE PRODUCTIVITY
3. Proper Policy
1. Overall business 2. Stage of Economy enactment and strong
climate conducive to (strong clusters)
rule of law
growth
12. MODEL USED FOR ANALYSIS
Climate for
Innovation based
local rivalry
• Local rules and incentives that encourage
investment and productivity e.g.
- salaries,
Factor - incentives for capital investments, Demand
Conditions - intellectual property protection
Conditions
• Vigorous local competition i.e.,
- Openness to foreign and local competition;
- Sophistication of company operations
Access to high quality business inputs
i.e., Sophisticated and demanding local
- Natural endowments, customers and needs e.g.,
- Human resources, - Strict quality, safety, and environmental
- Capital availability, Clusters of Related standards
- Physical infrastructure, and Supporting – Consumer protection laws
- Administrative infrastructure, Industries – Government procurement of
- Information infrastructure, advanced technology
- Scientific and technological infrastructure – Early demand for products and
Local availability of suppliers and supporting industries Services.
Presence of clusters instead of isolated firms
Source: Michael E Porter
13. IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
Key Issues for States
• More power in terms of tax sharing with center
• Reduce costs of doing business
• Developing training programs which meet the specific needs of the state
industrial clusters
• Focus on infrastructure investments on the most leveraged areas for
productivity and economic growth
• Implementing policies to support small growth businesses
• Enhancing the state’s skill development and training institutions for the same
• Relentlessly improve of the public education system, the essential foundation
14. GEOGRAPHIC INFLUENCES ON COMPETITIVENESS
• Influence and access federal
Nation policies and programs
• Integrate policies and
Neighboring states infrastructure with
neighbors
States
• Assist each city area in
City Regions developing its own strategy
• Connect rural regions with
Rural Regions urban areas
15. CONTRIBUTION OF HARYANA’S GSDP TO INDIAN GSDP
GSDP at current price at factor cost in Rupees Crore
6000000
5000000
4000000
3000000
2000000
1000000
0
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Haryana's GDP Indian GDP
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Haryana's GSDP
to Indian GDP in 3.02 3.24 3.40 3.48 3.52 3.54 3.56 3.75 3.83 3.98 4.19 4.04
Percentage
Terms
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
16. CONTRIBUTION OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR TO GSDP
GSDP at current price at factor cost in Rupees Crore
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Manufacturi
ng GSDP in
Haryana to
the total 20.27 19.97 20.30 20.65 20.46 20.91 20.75 19.38 18.39 16.95 15.83 17.26
GSDP in
Haryana in
Percentage
terms
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
17. CONTRIBUTION OF SERVICE SECTOR TO GSDP
250000
GSDP at current price at factor cost in Rupees Crore
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Services
GSDP in
Haryana to
the total 39.53 41.77 43.34 44.10 44.36 45.21 46.86 47.38 47.61 48.34 48.72 48.71
GSDP in
Haryana in
Percentage
terms
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
18. COMPOSITION OF HARYANA’S ECONOMY
Agriculture, forestry
and fishing
20%
Services
49%
Industry
31%
19. COMPOSITION OF HARYANA’S ECONOMY
3000000
2549085
2500000
GSDP in Rs. Crore
2000000
1492375
1500000
1000000 924340
500000
62181 98430
41482
0
Agriculture, forestry and fishing Industry Services
Indian contribution
Haryana’s contribution
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
20. COMPOSITION OF HARYANA’S ECONOMY IN GREATER DEPTH
7
6 Transport by other means
Real states, ownership of dwellings and
Railways business services
5 Agricuture
Haryana /National GSDP share (Percent) ,2011
Construction
Manufacturing Trade, hotel and restaurant
Electricity, gas and water supply
4
Forestry and logging
Other services
3
Public administration and defence
Storage
2 Banking and insurance
Communication
1
Fishing
Mining and quarrying
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
Change in contribution of GSDP of Haryana to total Indian GSDP, CAGR (2000-2011)
21. STATE PRIVATE WAGE PERFORMANCE
160000
140000
Jharkhand Wage Growth
rate 4.53%
Average Wages in Rupees ,2009
120000
Uttaranchal
Orissa
100000 Maharashtra
Goa
Average Wage :
Rupees 64,741
80000 Chhattisgarh West Bengal Madhya Pradesh
Haryana Karnataka
Gujarat Meghalaya
Delhi Himachal Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
60000 Andhra Pradesh
Punjub Tamil Nadu
Kerala Rajasthan
Jammu & Kashmir
Bihar Assam
40000
Manipur
Tripura Nagaland
20000 Low and declining versus India Low but rising versus India
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Wage Growth (CAGR), 2001 to 2008
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010
22. LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
400000
GSDP at Current Prices per labour force participant, 2011
Goa
350000 High but declining versus India Highly productive and Productivity
rising versus India
300000
Points
Index
57.28
e
Averag
India
All
Delhi
All India Average of
250000 8.44%
Haryana
200000
All India Average of of Punjab Maharashtra
Kerala Gujarat
1,21,265 Rupees/Labour Himachal Pradesh
150000 force participant Tamil Nadu
Karnataka Andhra Pradesh
Sikkim
West Bengal Uttarakhand Chhattisgarh
Mizoram Nagaland
100000 MeghalayaTripura Pradesh
Arunachal Orissa
Rajasthan
Jammu & Kashmir Assam
Madhya Pradesh Jharkhand
Manipur
Uttar Pradesh
50000 Bihar
Low and declining versus India Low but rising versus India
0
5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00
GSDP /Labor force participant growth rate(CAGR)
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
23. LONG TERM JOB GROWTH
90000000
Uttar Pradesh
80000000
70000000
All India Average of
60000000
2.05%
Number of Jobs, 2011
50000000
Maharashtra
Bihar
40000000
West Bengal
Andhra Pradesh
All India average of
Madhya Pradesh
30000000 1,62,99,464 Jobs Tamil Nadu
Rajasthan
/State Karnataka
Gujarat
20000000 Orissa
Jharkhand
Kerala Assam
Punjab
Haryana
Chhattisgarh
10000000 Delhi
Uttarakhand Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Nagaland Goa Tripura Mizoram Manipur
Arunachal Pradesh Meghalaya
0 Sikkim
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Losing Jobs Job growth rate CAGR, 2001-2010 Gaining Jobs
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
24. LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
30
Goa
jharkhand
25
s
Point
Index
57.28
ge
Avera
India
All
Below average Unemployment All India Average of -
20 2.12%
Rajasthan
Unemployment rate 2010
Bihar
Unemployment Rising
15
Unemployment rate
All India Average of Meghalaya
9.39% West Bengal kerala
Gujarat
Punjab MizoramOrissa
Uttar Pradesh
10
Haryana Nagaland
Manipur
Tripura Andhra Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh Above Average
Himachal Pradesh Assam Unemployment
Sikkim Maharashtra
Jammu Tamil Nadu
5 Uttarakhand
Chhattisgarh
Karnataka Delhi
0
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Change in Employment rate 1999-2010
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010
25. NEAR TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
30
Goa
jharkhand
Points
Avera
57.28
Index
All India Average of -
India
25
6.55%
All
ge
20
Unemployment rate 2010
Rajasthan
Bihar
15
All India Average of Meghalaya
West Bengal
9.39% Punjab
Gujarat kerala
Orissa
Haryana 10
Uttar Pradesh
Manipur
Mizoram Nagaland Madhya Pradesh
Tripura Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim Assam
Himachal Pradesh Maharashtra Tamil Nadu
Jammu Uttarakhand
5
Chhattisgarh
Karnataka
Delhi
0
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Change in Employment rate 2008 to 2010
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010
26. GROSS AREA SOWN VERSUS IRRIGATED AREA
100000
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu Andhra Pradesh
10000 Gujarat
West Bengal
Punjab Karnataka
Chhattisgarh BiharOrissaHaryana
Log of area sown in ‘000 hectares
Assam
Kerala
All India Average Jharkhand
67,41,000 Uttarakhand
1000 Himachal Pradesh & Kashmir
Jammu
hectares
India
All
All India Average
Meghalaya Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh Tripura 30,03,000 hectares
Goa
100 Sikkim
Mizoram
Delhi
10
1
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Log of Irrigated Area in ‘000 hectares
Source: MOA, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010
27. HEALTHCARE
Percentage of Total government Expenditure on Medical, Health
10
Delhi
9
8
7
and Sanitation
6 Goa
Jammu & Kashmir
Uttarakhand
All India Average
5 Manipur
Himachal Pradesh 4.02%
AssamKerala
Meghalaya West Bengal Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Nagaland Uttar Pradesh
Mizoram Rajasthan
4 Gujarat
Sikkim Chhattisgarh Karnataka
Jharkhand Haryana Andhra Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra
Orissa
Punjab Bihar
3
Arunachal Pradesh
India
All
2
All India Average 1633
Crores
1
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Total Government Expenditure on Medical, Health and Sanitation in Crores
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
28. PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES ELECTRIFIED
120
100 100.0
100.099.7100.098.2 98.2 99.9100.0 100.0 100.0
All India 100 96.9 96.4 96.9 97.3
94.4
Average of 88.3
85.8
88.3
84.96 % 80.8 80.6
80
69.2
64.4 62.6
61.3
59.3
60 56.8 57.2
40
31.1
20
0
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
29. TELEDENSITY
140000
Goa
120000
y = 429.3x + 12630
R² = 0.388
Delhi
100000
Haryana
80000
GSDP per Capita
Maharashtra
Gujarat Punjab
Kerala
Himachal Pradesh
60000 Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Andhra Pradesh
Sikkim
Arunachal Pradesh Bengal
West
MeghalayaChhattisgarh
Mizoram
Tripura
Orissa Uttarakhand
40000
Jammu & Kashmir Rajasthan
Nagaland Jharkhand
Manipur
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
20000
0
50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250
Teledensity
Source: Ministry of telecom, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
30. DEBT TO GDP RATIO
West Bengal 42.8 Prescribed limit according to the
Uttaranchal 41.1 growth and stability Pact of EU
Uttar Pradesh 43.5
Tripura 42.2
Tamil Nadu 25.5
Sikkim 80.6
Rajasthan 41.1
Punjab 35.2
Orissa 30.6
Nagaland 59.4
Mizoram 109.1
Meghalya 37.3
Manipur 77.4
Maharashtra 25.1
Madhya Pradesh 34.4
Kerala 34.3
Karnataka 24.3
Jharkhand 33.6
Jammu & Kashmir 70.1
Himachal 55.7
Haryana 19
Gujarat 32.1
Goa 35.5
Delhi 13.8 Prescribed limit according
Chattisgarh 15.2 to WTO for developing
Bihar 39.7 economies
Assam 28
Arunachal 115.9
Andhra 30.1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
31. RURAL POPULATION VERSUS RURAL POPULATION GROWTH RATES
4.000
Meghalaya
Arunachal Pradesh Bihar
Mizoram Manipur Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand Rajasthan
Chhattisgarh Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh
2.000 Assam
Himachal Pradesh
Uttarakhand Orissa Maharashtra
Haryana Gujarat
Punjab KarnatakaBengal
West
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Andhra Pradesh
0.000 Sikkim
10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Growth rate (CAGR 2001-2011)
Nagaland
Goa Thousands
-2.000
Kerala
-4.000
-6.000
Delhi
-8.000
-10.000
Population in Rural areas as per census (provisional Data) in Thousands
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
32. URBAN POPULATION VERSUS URBAN POPULATION GROWTH RATES
12
Sikkim
10
Growth rate (CAGR 2001-2011)
8
Kerala
Tripura
6
Nagaland
Haryana
4 Manipur
Uttarakhand
Chhattisgarh
Arunachal Pradesh Andhra Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Goa Bihar Gujarat
Meghalaya Jharkhand Karnataka
Assam Orissa Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh
Mizoram Delhi Madhya Pradesh Tamil Nadu
Punjab West Bengal
Maharashtra
2
Himachal Pradesh
0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Thousands
Population in Urban areas as per census (provisional Data) in Thousands
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
33. 100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
0
151,726
455,962
561,977
529037
313,446
1069165
906,309
551414
573,741
1406861
822,132
1899624
595,036
2368971
960,981
2,710,051
688,704
6167805
3,091,169
7,025,583
3,414,106
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
9134820
16,333,916
419319
8,821,588
Urban Population in 2011
16531493
5,936,538
19603658
10,387,436
RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION IN INDIA
17,316,800
4,388,756
26780516
7,929,292
25,036,946
15,932,171
17455506
6,996,124
Rural Population in 2011
34,951,234
25,712,811
34670817
23,578,175
37552529
17,080,776
51,540,236
34,949,729
37,189,229
20,059,666
52537899
28,353,745
56311788
29,134,060
62,213,676
11,729,609
92075028
50,827,531
61545441
44,470,455
155,111,022
34. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE IN HARYANA
2710000
3000000
2635000
2490000
2402000
2382000
2379000
2500000
2018000
1750000
2000000
Population in Numbers
1532000
1330000
1500000
1075000
804000
1000000
578000
434000
373000
299000
248000
500000
0
0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+
years years years years years years years years years years years year years years years years years
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
35. RURAL URBAN AND TOTAL POPULATION
120
Delhi
Urban Population as a percentage of total Population
100 All India Average
India
67.02%
All
80
Goa
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
60 Kerala
Mizoram Gujarat
Karnataka
All India Average Punjab Pradesh
Andhra Bengal
West
Haryana
32.98% MadhyaUttar Pradesh
Pradesh
40 Rajasthan
Uttarakhand
Manipur
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Nagaland
Chhattisgarh
Tripura
Sikkim
Orissa
Arunachal Pradesh Bihar
Meghalaya
Assam
20
Himachal Pradesh
0
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
-20
Rural Population as a percentage of total Population
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
36. SEX RATIO VERSUS SEX RATIO GROWTH RATES
0.8
Delhi
0.7
0.6 All India Average 940
India
females/1000 males Mizoram
All
0.5
Nagaland
0.4 Arunachal Pradesh
Goa
CAGR growth rate 2001-11
All India Average Punjab
Kerela
0.3
0.169% CAGR Haryana
Assam
0.2 Sikkim Meghalaya
Tripura
Madhya Pradesh
WestAndhra Pradesh
Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Manipur
Himachal Pradesh
Rajasthan Tamil Nadu
Jharkhand
0.1 Maharashtra
Orissa
Karnataka
Chattisgarh
Uttarakhand
Gujarat
0
0 200 400 600 800 Bihar
1000 1200
-0.1
Jammu and Kashmir
-0.2
-0.3
Sex ratio
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis