User talk:MONGO
 | This user is aware of the discretionary sanction topic area(s):
|
 |
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than fifteen years. |
 | This user received the Editor of the Week award. |
| FACs needing feedback view • | |
|---|---|
| 1838 Jesuit slave sale | Review it now |
| Red panda | Review it now |
| Pan Am Flight 7 | Review it now |
This is the talkpage of the notorious MONGO! Leave me a message if you dare!
WP:URFA/2020[edit]
Hi, MONGO ... I pinged you to a query here. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Slow as Christmas!![edit]
|
|
:)[edit]
Dear Mongo, are you a government spook? You seem to possess an almost religious imperative to define the Franklin Scandal as a hoax. Have you read Nick Bryants' book? Have you even attempted to do research on this matter? Because as a 37-year-old from Canada, and in possession of above average cognitive abilities, I am rather inclined to believe that you have been compromised and someone, somewhere, has hired you to make sure this Scandal remains classified as a "conspiracy" on Wikipedia. Or perhaps you really just desire to toe-the-party-line, as they say.
There are countless corroborated testimonies to the fact that these children were horrifically abused and tortured. Not to mention all the mysterious deaths of those investigating the nefarious deeds surrounding Lawrence E. King and his colleagues, family, friends in law enforcement and political co-conspirators. Why not create a table of all the mysterious deaths surrounding those involved with the case, like the one on Marc Dutrouxs' page? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux
Please, illuminate me. Jayboots13 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- I work for an agency that doesn't even have a name, numbers or letters. Thats all I can share and believe me, if I told you you'd disappear. So you don't want that. Best to run along and edit butterfly articles or something less dangerous.--MONGO (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed[edit]
Dear MONGO, My edit that you have reverted on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was actually a vandalism that I was removing, It's a vandalism in Arabic language, I swear, I am an Egyptian, I know. (خرا) in Arabic language means (shit) in English language. You understood. IT'S EGYPT GUYS (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
MONGO arbitration amendment[edit]
I have requested an amendment to the MONGO arbitration case. The amendment is taking place at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/MONGO Steve M (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
About a Research on the History of Conspiracy Theories[edit]
Dear MONGO,
I take the liberty to contact you, I am a doctoral student in political science at the University of Paris 1 and my work focuses on the history of conspiracy theories, on which I have already published a few scientific articles and I am now preparing a book. I have been interviewing conspiracists and truthers, their critics and opponents for several years, working particularly on the French association ReOpen911 and the question of 9/11, as a now "historical" case of conspiracy...And obviously wikipedia has been a rather major theater of discussions/criticisms on the subject (up to the point if I rightly understood that it contributed to the implementation of the "semi-protected" pages?).
Looking at the related conspiracy pages' statistics, I realized that you have worked for long on these issues on wikipedia, hence my message and a small request: I would really appreciate if you can share bits of this "experience" with me in an interview
All the best
Pierre France pierre.France [arob.] zoho.com https://univ-paris1.academia.edu/PierreFrance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.187.1.47 (talk) 09:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Pierre, you would need to send me an email to discuss using the email this user link at left.--MONGO (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Motion proposed[edit]
A motion regarding the amendment request you are a party to, Amendment request: MONGO, has been proposed. The motion can be seen here. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Motion enacted and amendment request closed[edit]
The motion Motion: MONGO (alt), in the amendment request which you are a party to, has been enacted and the amendment request closed. The enacted motion is as follows:
Remedy 1 of the MONGO case ("Links to ED") is amended to read, "Links to, and/or content from, Encyclopædia Dramatica may be removed wherever found on Wikipedia, absent explicit consensus for their inclusion."
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Ricky (Rick) Dearborn[edit]
Dear Mongo, I just wanted to let you know that the edit on Rick Dearborn's article was not vandalism and that his birth name is Ricky and not Rick. I have confirmed this fact with members of his family. kind regards, Thaddeus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.151.199 (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
2018 Volcán de Fuego eruption[edit]
Hi, It is best to order the article by name in the category, and not by year, since it is already a date-ordered category. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- It was an accidental rollback which I immediately reverted...or did you not see that?--MONGO (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Reliable sources call Trump's comments and actions stupid, funny looking, politically incorrect, boorish, un-American, racist and misogynist[edit]
Not me. Google any of those adjectives alongside his name, if you think I'm playing some game. Why is "pathological liar" OK to repeat, but not the rest? InedibleHulk (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Pathological liar should come out too.--MONGO (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- I collapsed it, along with "unapologetic reactionary", someone else can worry about revdel or whatever. Just "racist" and "misogynist" left. Nobody seems to think there's anything potentially offensive to a living person in those softballs. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
"Glacial retreat" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
I'm a little behind the times[edit]
[1]--MONGO (talk) 05:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
 | |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
9/11 Pages[edit]
Please leave my edits to the pages dealing with the 9/11 Twin Towers pages alone. I haven't removed or deleted any information, I've simply made them more narratively fluid. What you've reverted makes no sense, and doesn't impact the information in any way, it only reads better.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxq32 (talk • contribs)
You still kickin'?[edit]
Is there a new movement to lazily edit WP these days? 
- Family, work and other distractions such as vacation with poor internet access is the reason I've been hard to find as of late.--MONGO (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Arrowhead Pool for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrowhead Pool until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Clarityfiend (talk) 23:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
FAR review[edit]
I have nominated Retreat of glaciers since 1850 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
I hope to see this article updated! Let me know if you know others that may be interested to help. Femke (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Femke then get yourself busy. You've been so concerned for over a year about the status of the article, yet I see not one edit except on the talk page by you. I really just don't get the rationale of someone who claims to be interested in climate change issues and has supposedly produced scholarly work on the subject yet instead of working to fix what they see as shortcomings in such articles, instead does zero except to submit them for removal from FA status.--MONGO (talk) 10:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Cmon, I work a lot on articles myself (including climate change, sea level rise). I've helped save Earth at FAR and spent a lot of time improving tropical cyclone there (we brought it back close to GA level). This article is a bit too low in readership for me to work on extensively, but I do think it's important we show our readers accurately which articles are currently up-to-date and meeting the FA standards. Femke (talk) 11:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
|
Happy First Edit Day, MONGO, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 01:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
FAR for Yellowstone fires of 1988[edit]
I have nominated Yellowstone fires of 1988 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. NoahTalk 15:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)