User talk:Editor2020

Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
86		Haida mythology (talk)	Add sources
346		Korban (talk)	Add sources
44		Moed (talk)	Add sources
133		Catholic Apostolic Church (talk)	Add sources
34		Khordad Sal (talk)	Add sources
144		Somali mythology (talk)	Add sources
140		Mansions of Rastafari (talk)	Cleanup
38		Schwenkfelder Church (talk)	Cleanup
529		Amorites (talk)	Cleanup
1,442		Monotheism (talk)	Expand
151		Laryngeal theory (talk)	Expand
751		Sacrament (talk)	Expand
2,045		Indigenous peoples (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
294		Witchcraft and divination in the Hebrew Bible (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,388		Salafi movement (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
107		Ancient Hebrew writings (talk)	Merge
118		Pillar of fire (theophany) (talk)	Merge
414		Religion in Asia (talk)	Merge
301		The Bible and violence (talk)	Wikify
443		Confession (religion) (talk)	Wikify
982		A Brief History of Time (talk)	Wikify
10		Classics of Western Spirituality (talk)	Orphan
2		Abol Hussein Tanhai (talk)	Orphan
3		Elisabeth von Staegemann (talk)	Orphan
16		Boomeritis (talk)	Stub
4		Matengo Highlands (talk)	Stub
3		Kavanaq (talk)	Stub
67		House of Elders (Afghanistan) (talk)	Stub
41		Zophar (talk)	Stub
9		Fritas de prasa (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

"Ruach haKodesh", i.e. Ruach (Kabbalah)

Why? --93.34.85.148 (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Why what? Editor2020 (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Why are you not understanding our Torah?! --93.34.85.148 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

I am not understanding this article because it was very poorly written. That is the purpose of articles, to explain the subject. Editor2020 (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah! ...and who are you... to say that Torah would be "poor"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.85.148 (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

No, not the Torah, but this particular Wikipedia article. Editor2020 (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah! ...but you aren't undestanding or the "contrary"? --93.34.85.148 (talk) 20:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC) i.e. Do you understand or not? --93.34.85.148 (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

So, the conclusion: We understand the Torah and this article of Torah... but you... NOT.--93.34.85.148 (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Probably. Editor2020 (talk) 21:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Cleanup on Jesus

Thanks for your recent cleanup on this article. The edits are improvements. However, per MOS:POSS and Ermenrich, the possessive should indeed be Jesus’s, not Jesus’. I didn’t think a full revert was warranted for something this minor but wanted to mention it. Jtrevor99 (talk) 04:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

When I tried to edit the article this popped up:

Please do not change the way dates are expressed in this article, unless you have attained consensus with other editors on the talk page of this article. Based on the consensus in this request for comment dates should remain as they are (i.e., with BC/AD only). The only exceptions apply to quotations used within the text, which should not be altered.

The lead paragraphs and infobox were created by consensus after considerable discussion by a variety of editors. Out of courtesy for this process, please discuss any proposed changes on the talk page before editing it.

This article uses the apostrophe-only possessive: Jesus' not Jesus's Do not change usage within quotes. (see FAQ)

Editor2020 (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Please do not add short descriptions that are in excess of 40 characters. These are not short and are against the guideline ("no more than about 40 characters"). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Oiketerion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oiketerion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oiketerion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

 --Lambiam 17:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Italics for Ifrit

Hello, you recently changed the Title "Ifrit" to italics. I can not fully understand this decission. According to WP:ITALICTITLE, an article should be italized when it is "for example, taxonomic names, the names of ships, the titles of books, films, and other creative works, and foreign phrases are italicized both in ordinary text and in article titles". I am not sure if the Ifrit as a demon is a taxonomic name, I guess not (although Afarit are appear in zoologial works in medieval Islam.) The other possibility is, it could be recognized as "foreign phrase", but the article is not about the phrase meant by the term "ifrit", but about the idea of an Ifrit, similar to "Jinn" or a "demon". The other article Taghut is more about the term, since taghut is not a concept, while the Ifrit is.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it is about being a foreign word not familiar in English. "Demon" is an English word, and shouldn't be italicised. "Jinn", could go either way, but I think it is familiar enough in English not to be italicised. Your opinion may be different, and I'm not going to Edit War about it. Editor2020 (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I checked how most sources I could found use it. It seems, they use the term in italics, when introduing it, too. Probably, I got used to the term too much, to recognize it as foreign. It seems you are right about this.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Youn Chul-Ho

Shalom, I need your help. The text above has been declined severl times. Would you correct it? 칼빈500 (talk) 09:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

As mentioned, you need to improve the references. That means you need to provide WP:SECONDARY sources to replace the WP:PRIMARY sources you now have. As I am unfamiliar with this person I cannot do that for you. I'll make some formatting changes to your article if you wish. Editor2020 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind mention. 칼빈500 (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Modalistic Monarchianism article

Your additions have been reverted, and a consensus hasn't even been reached on the talk page. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

TheLionHasSeen and Redvince1 are engaged in an WP:EDIT WAR on Modalistic Monarchianism. I attempted to end it by reverting to the version before the edit war started and telling them to work it out on the Talk page. I seem to have unsuccessful and they have continued to edit war. Editor2020 (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Slave bible

Please don't tweak anything this way again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

You don't think the change from "A slave bible is a Bible specifically edited to serve for enslaved Christians" to "A slave bible is a Bible specifically edited for slaves" is better? I certainly do. The change from "A" to "The" was made by User:Veverve on 6 March 2020, so it was not I who "narrowed this down to one specific book". Editor2020 (talk) 02:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Since this article only mentions one version of the slave bible, I think that Veverve was probably right to change the wording to "The". I have opened a discussion of this issue on the article's Talk page. Your input there would be appreciated. Editor2020 (talk) 04:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Please don't turn enslaved people into "slaves"--it's 2021. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't get that, but if that's what you want to do, OK. Editor2020 (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop pretending like you don't know all of Africa descendants are the original

I just got through Reading about how how Igbo people I'm not being recognized as having Jewish ties because they can't prove their heritage. The heritage of all original Jews the true Hebrew has been erased by the Catholic Church and Europeans. It's amazing how an article can be written and the research has not been done or the refusal to be honest and tell the truth. Christopher Columbus did not discover America Africans were in this country even before the Indians Africans are the original Jew as well as God's chosen we are Hebrew we are Israel we are under protection to the covenant what is promised will be ours there's nothing anyone can do. 208.104.178.91 (talk) 11:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

^{( Buttinsky)} Wow! I've seen some crazy claims on WP but I think this takes the cake!

The cake!!

Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!

I have exceeded my limit on 'thank you's' for Christianization of the late Roman empire but want you to know how much I appreciate your excellent work. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Just trying to help. If any change causes upset let me know.Editor2020 (talk) 23:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

You did help. Thank you for that freedom as well! The only thing that causes me indigestion are changes that create inaccuracies. You haven't and don't as far as I can see - so no worries mate! Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

You seem to have previously contributed to the article Christianity and Islam.

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find you interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Uae blasphemy laws.

Thank you for restoring the article. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 13:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Free Religious Association nontheism category

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit on the Free Religious Association article. In hindsight I should've put my reason in the edit summary but I will put it here: the article says its goal was a "religion free of dogma or theology", so I'm inclined to say it is nontheistic. I mean, what else is a religion without a theology?

I do apologize if the edit was premature - I was following earlier precedent however. The Raëlism article has the category nontheism even though it is never explicitly called that in the article (though it is called an atheistic religion). So it seemed to me that my edit was being consistent with earlier articles.

In any case I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter, have a nice day. 24.44.73.34 (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Well OK, I restored it. Editor2020 (talk) 14:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Meaning of colors in Old Testament table

Your removal of "[clarification needed]" in the Old Testament article is a bit disingenuous. You added the colors to the table so you know what they mean, but nobody else does. Could you add a legend? Or tell me what they mean and I'll add a legend. Thanks, Dan Bloch (talk) 07:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

I didn't add the colors and I'm unsure what the are supposed to mean. Editor2020 (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps you should discuss that on the article's Talk page. Editor2020 (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

I think you did, way back in 2013. But posting to the talk page seems like the right thing to do now. Thanks, Dan Bloch (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Ah. It seems I placed the table (with the colors) in the article. If I had known enough about tables I would have rearranged it and removed the colors. You are welcome to do so. Editor2020 (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Categories on redirects

Please don't remove categories on redirects. They are used to make sure that an article shows up under the title by which it will be looked for in that category, especially after a merge. Skyerise (talk) 03:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

OK. Editor2020 (talk) 03:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)