(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

June 8, 2016
We have only lost. She lost her life, and I lost the person I love most in the world.

Claire Wilmot delivers a heart-breaking critique on how social media can aid in expressing public mourning, but can be damaging for allowing the personal grief of closer loved ones. Read Wilmot’s personal essay The Space Between Mourning and Grief:

image

The way people mourn online has been the subject of much cultural comment recently, particularly in the wake of mass tragedies and high-profile celebrity deaths, such as those of David Bowie and Prince. Some argue that the likes of Facebook and Twitter have opened up public space for displays of grief that had been restricted to private spheres of secular culture. But rather than reconstructing an outlet for public grief, social media often reproduces the worst cultural failings surrounding death, namely platitudes that help those on the periphery of a tragedy rationalize what has happened, but obscure the uncomfortable, messy reality of loss.

Social media has increased the speed and ease of communication to an unprecedented degree, and yet sites like Facebook and Twitter are poorly suited to grief’s strangeness. By design, social media demands tidy conclusions, and dilutes tragedy so that it’s comprehensible even to those only distantly aware of what has happened. The majority of Facebook posts mourning Lauren’s death were full of “silver linings” comments that were so far removed from the horror of the reality that I found them isolating and offensive. Implicit in claims that Lauren was no longer suffering, or that “everything happens for a reason” are redemptive clauses—ones that have a silencing effect on those who find no value in their pain.

It makes sense that those who knew Lauren sought some kind of meaning in her death in an attempt to re-order a universe disrupted. My sister was a smart, kind, athletic business student and a social entrepreneur—and she had an incredibly rare form of brain cancer that ended up killing her. It’s naively assumed that good, healthy people deserve good, healthy lives. When they’re robbed of what cosmic justice is owed to them, the laws that many believe govern human lives become suddenly suspect, or are revealed as illusory.

Read the entire story here.

  1. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. scoticus reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. usurpthecity reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. rocksforjocks reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. hyphae-cipher reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. drdarkheart reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. blckmarks reblogged this from profkew
  8. jfore reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. brandipettijohn reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. nightowl2love reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. profkew reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. bilalnedman reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. allmydokkuns reblogged this from bubblelounge
  14. amywhipple reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. theatlantic posted this