I’m against the idea of “genius.” To me it’s like talking about “naturals” in sports, or speculation in a frat house about whether a woman is a “perfect ten.”
Of course true outlier talent exists: Mozart in one category, Usain Bolt in another. But in virtually all human endeavor, the relevant question (according to me) is not how much raw ability someone supposedly has. Rather it is where, along that person’s own range from lackluster to outstanding performance, he or she has the determination, patience, open-mindedness, character, curiosity — and, yes, opportunity — to end up.
Because I think that almost anyone is capable of better work than he or she is usually called on to deliver, I think that talk about “genius” or “naturals” mis-places the emphasis. It directs attention toward something we can’t really measure and is not within any individual’s control, namely theoretical levels of talent, and away from what matters more and what we can encourage: actual performance and achievement, day by day and over the years.
Therefore I never call the MacArthur grants “the genius awards” and dislike references to them as such. (By dislike I mean, fingernails-on-blackboard. I will say that Yoni Appelbaum gives a manful and effective defense of a certain kind of “genius” in a note today.) I view them instead as both recognitions, and encouragements: recognitions of exceptional work so far, and encouragements for even more.
In those two important senses — recognizing achievements to date, and offering material and emotional encouragement for even more to come — the MacArthur team could not have done better than with their choice of our wonderful Atlantic friend and colleague Ta-Nehisi Coates as one of the latest group of winners. His achievement is extraordinary, and his potential is unlimited.