(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

McConnell Will Oppose START Treaty; Reid Sets Vote to End Debate

1 day ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday that he would not support the new START nuclear arms control treaty with Russia if it comes to a vote in the lame duck session, but the two top members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – Democrat John Kerry and Republican Richard Lugar – predicted its passage.

Kerry, chairman of the Senate panel, said on ABC's "This Week," "I believe it will pass, and I believe there will be a vote."

Lugar, the committee's ranking member and one of the GOP's elder statesmen on foreign policy issues, said on the same show: "Several Republicans will support it, and I join the chairman in believing that there are the votes there. The problem is really getting to that final vote."

John Kerry and Richard LugarOn Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid set a vote on ending debate on the treaty for Tuesday.

"After months of consideration and five days of open and robust debate, it is time to move forward on a treaty that will help reverse nuclear proliferation and make it harder for terrorists to get their hands on a nuclear weapon," Reid said in a statement released Sunday. "Every day we delay is another day we do not have inspectors on the ground in Russia monitoring their nuclear arsenal.

"As we move ahead, I look forward to continuing to debate amendments. But soon this will come down to a simple choice: You either want to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists, or you don't."

As for McConnell, he said on CNN's "State of the Union": "I've decided I cannot support the treaty. I think the verification provisions are inadequate. And I do worry about the missile defense implications of it."

But McConnell offered no prediction as to whether his position would prevail. "We're going to find out here in the next few days," he said.

Reid expressed disappointment about McConnell's decision but said, "I look forward to strong bipartisan support to pass this treaty before we end this session of Congress."

The Senate resumed debate on the treaty Sunday after rejecting an amendment on Saturday that was regarded as the most serious Republican challenge to its passage. During Sunday's session, Democrats rejected another Republican amendment that would have killed the treaty by forcing it back to negotiations.

The amendment voted down on Saturday would have stripped out language from the treaty's preamble that critics asserted would have inhibited plans of the United States and its NATO allies to establish a missile defense shield for all NATO states.

The language acknowledges a link between offensive and defensive weapons and, by doing so, is an acknowledgment of concerns voiced by Russia that the deterrent factor of its nuclear arsenal, if reduced too much, could be offset by an anti-missile defense system.

However, supporters of the treaty underline that the language is nonbinding and has no legal impact. In advance of Saturday's vote, President Barack Obama sent a letter to the Senate assuring lawmakers that the treaty "places no limitations on the development or deployment of our missile defense programs." Obama, in the letter, also brushed aside Russian warnings it would withdraw from the treaty if it ultimately did view the anti-missile system as a threat to its security.
McConnell claimed that many GOP senators, other than those on the Foreign Relations Committee, had not had time to delve into this and other issues for themselves. "Members are uneasy about it, don't feel thoroughly familiar with it," he said. "And I think we'd have been a lot better off to take our time. We would have been willing to give them a time certain to complete this early next year. They turned that down. They want to do it now."

On ABC, Kerry said, "There is no legal binding statement whatsoever" in the treaty about the missile defense plans and the language in the preamble "is a sort of statement that for political purposes was necessary to achieve what we achieved."

Kerry added: "The Russians wanted to have a binding statement precluding us from having missile defense. There is nothing in there that restricts our missile defense system. The president made that crystal clear in a letter he sent to the leadership."

Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, who has been the chief Republican negotiator on the START treaty, said on "Fox News Sunday," "Look, tell it to the Russians. Send a letter to the Russians. In fact, change the preamble to the treaty, which would eliminate any doubt about this issue. ... That's why I say talk to the Russians. Don't send a letter to Mitch McConnell."

On CBS' "Face the Nation," Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina also said he would not vote for START "until I hear from the Russians that they understand we can develop four stages of missile defense, and if we do, they won't withdraw from the treaty."

He disputed predictions that the treaty would pass during the lame duck session, saying: "There's been no real serious debate on START. With 50 amendments left, I don't think you can have a serious debate between now and January 4th. Given the process and the substance, there's a real hurdle there."

Lugar said that it would be "a very bad picture" if the treaty was not ratified.

"The importance of this is that the Russians are important to us," Lugar said. "It's very important that we have negotiations with the Russians, as we will proceed then, to take a look at the tactical nuclear weapons, other ways the Russians can work with us against nuclear in Iran or North Korea."

Lugar said the treaty was also important so that verification inspections could resume. "It's very important to have boots on the ground in Russia inspecting what is occurring, verifying what is occurring, as we have had, so we don't make vast mistakes in terms of rebuilding all of our armed forces or taking other actions," he said.
Filed Under: Senate, Arms Control
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • AIM
  • E-mail
  • Mobile

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.
 

Add Your Comment

Follow Politics Daily

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video »
  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»

politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>