(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Sarah Palin's Iowa trip points to 2012 presidential run

Attendance at Republican dinner in key state is seen as biggest sign yet that Sarah Palin aims to take on Obama in 2012

Sarah Palin addresses a 9/11 event in Anchorage, Alaska
Sarah Palin addresses a 9/11 event in Anchorage, Alaska, that was also attended by Glenn Beck. Photograph: Michael Dinneen/AP

There are boxes that US presidential hopefuls have to tick early. They have to start building a campaign team, albeit discreetly. They have to set up a fundraising machine. And they have to visit Iowa, the small but politically crucial state that traditionally kicks off a White House run.

Sarah Palin has ticked the first two and on Friday will tick the third when she is the main speaker at a $100-a-seat Republican dinner in Des Moines, Iowa. The party's sole superstar has not yet said whether she will seek the nomination to take on Barack Obama in 2012. But all the indications point to a run, and Friday's visit is the biggest sign yet.

Democrats may detest her, and so does the Republican establishment, for her perceived lack of sophistication and polarising effect on the electorate. But neither will make the choice in the Iowa caucus. The party activists will, and they are shifting behind her. Long before the contest has formally begun, Palin is fast on the way to becoming unstoppable.

Marilea David, a lifelong Republican, is typical of the fan base, seeing in Palin an alternative to the old-boy network. "I think she is great. She is the only person I am excited about just now," David said over coffee in west Des Moines.

"She is fiscally conservative. She married her husband for love, not money. She does not have perfect kids, which is big for me. She has been totally vetted by the liberal media and they did not come up with anything other than she is a 'hick'."

David, 52, who runs her own home tutoring business, will not be attending Friday's dinner. "I am a broke Republican. But if she runs, I will give her my time. I would love to campaign for her."

The dinner is shaping up as a big media event, with journalists drawn by the will she/won't she drama and by the importance of Iowa, the state where once every four years presidential dreams are either destroyed or begin to be realised.

Kathie Obradovich, political columnist at the Des Moines Register, sees Palin's visit as highly significant. It will be her first since a short stop last year to publicise her autobiography, Going Rogue. "Palin is aware that there are flames of speculation over whether she will run for president and coming to Iowa fans that into a wildfire."

Obradovich believes any clues to whether she is contemplating a run will not come in the speech but in what else she does while in Iowa, whom she speaks to and whether she puts out feelers about potential support.

Although the Iowa caucus to decide whom the state will support as its Republican hopeful is not scheduled until February 2012, candidates often have to begin courting support there at least a year to 18 months in advance, long before they formally declare their candidacy.

Mitt Romney, the multimillionaire and former Massachusetts governor who was John McCain's main rival in 2008, has already recruited a skeleton campaign team in the state. The former House speaker Newt Gingrich visited for a fundraising event last week.

Another potential candidate, Tim Pawlenty, governor of Minnesota, has made five trips to Iowa in the past year. Others weighing whether to run include Haley Barbour, the governor of Mississippi; Mitch Daniels, governor of Indiana; and Senator John Thune, of South Dakota.

A Des Moines Register poll in June gave Romney a 62% favourability rating among Republicans, Palin 58% and Gingrich 56%. Others trailed well behind. Mike Huckabee, who won in 2008, has ruled himself out of the race.

Romney, the establishment choice, at present represents the biggest obstacle to Palin. But his name does not generate much warmth or excitement among activists. At 67, Gingrich may be too old.

The dinner will provide firm evidence of Palin's popularity. How many are prepared to stump up the $100? Charlie Gruschow, a Republican and founder of the Des Moines Tea Party, who has taken two tables, seating 20, and filled them, estimated the event could attract 2,500 to 3,000.

Among those planning to attend is Richard Rogers, 60, a pilot who has been active in Republican politics since his teens. From his den in his home in a wealthy Des Moines suburb, he pulled out a glass from the 1964 Barry Goldwater presidential campaign enscribed with the slogan: "The right drink for the conservative taste." He dug out a red sticker he distributed when he was one of the leaders of the Iowa students for Ronald Reagan campaign for the Republican nomination in 1968. He was chairman in Iowa of the Fred Thompson campaign in 2008.

He is not committed to anyone yet, but of the field so far he likes Palin, who reminds him of Reagan, one of the party's best-loved leaders. "We have not seen such enthusiasm and people getting behind a charismatic leader from the conservative-libertarian side since Reagan. She has thought hard about what she believes in, is unapologetic about her beliefs and creates huge enthusiasm ... If she decides to run for president, I will be an enthusiastic supporter," Rogers said.

Momentum has been building this year for a run. In addition to the money pouring in from her autobiography, her speaking engagements and a regular slot on Fox News, Palin has established a political fundraising committee that in the spring alone brought in $865,815. She has been beefing up her staff, including employing speechwriters and hiring consultants to brief her on domestic and foreign policy.

She has been making appearances at high-profile events such as a conservative rally in Washington last month with the popular conservative television commentator Glenn Beck, and again with him in Alaska at a 9/11 rally on Saturday. She has a documentary on Alaska airing nationwide in the autumn and her second book, America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag, is scheduled for publication at the end of the year.

The paperback version of Going Rogue was published in August. The book paints a picture of an outsider who repeatedly takes on the Republican establishment and wins.

Larry Sabato, director of the political centre at the University of Virginia, refuses to predict whether she will stand. "She does not know herself. She is just keeping the doors open. And she wants to keep all of us guessing. Sarah Palin being Sarah Palin will decide at the last minute, when she feels like it. She is not the sort to have a detailed masterplan, following it from day to day."

Sabato predicts that if she runs, she will win Iowa. "More important is what happens if she is nominated. You are looking at a landslide to the Democrats. There is no one the Democrats want more. Obama would expect to win, even if the economy was bad. She is popular among Republicans but in the country as a whole she is unpopular."

The closest she has come to hinting she will run was in an interview with Beck on Fox News in January, telling him she would happily go back to her home in Wasilla, Alaska, to her family and the outdoors, "but if I believe that in some capacity I can help this great nation, I'm going to be willing to sacrifice and to change some things in my lifestyle in order to serve".

She has built up a network of support this year, carefully choosing her endorsements for the November congressional and gubernatorial elections. She has tended to pick insurgent candidates supported by the Tea Party and similar grassroots conservative groups unhappy with the Republican establishment. She has also endorsed what she calls "mama grizzlies", a host of female candidates who believe in strong leadership and family values. Most of her picks, from Rand Paul in Kentucky to Joe Miller in Alaska, have won.

In Iowa itself, she upset Tea Party activists by endorsing the Republican establishment candidate for governor, Terry Branstad, ignoring their candidate, Bob Vander Plaats. As a result Kathy Carley, a Republican and founder of the grassroots group Save Our American Republic, is in unforgiving mood. She is not going to the dinner and will not support Palin. "I used to admire her quite a bit but I have lost faith in her," she said.

Carley, 62, a retired life insurance underwriter, saw the endorsement as a political calculation on the part of Palin, concluding that Branstad was more likely to win than Plaats and that Branstad could help her if she runs in Iowa.

Gruschow was also unhappy with the endorsement. But he is prepared to forgive Palin and, while he hopes some conservative dark horse might yet emerge, he would like to see her stand. "I like to think of Sarah Palin as the Margaret Thatcher of America. I admire her toughness. I would work for her campaign if asked," he said.

Sarah Palin's CV

Now 46, she was born in Idaho. Her father, a teacher, liked the outdoors, and moved the family to Alaska.

Education Her higher education was erratic, in part because she had to pay her own way. She had stints as a beauty queen. Jobs afterwards included sports reporting and working in the salmon fishing industry.

Family She has given her five children unusual names, the first one called Track because she and her husband, Todd, liked athletics.

Politics Her first exposure to politics came when she successfully stood for the council in her home town of Wasilla, Alaska, in 1992, before becoming mayor in 2002. Mounting a small-scale campaign that involved driving her children around Alaska, she won the governorship in 2006. She is on the populist right of the Republican party, adored by most Tea Party activists who share her brand of conservatism, summed up by a belief in tight fiscal policies, God, strong defence and family.

Rise to fame She gained national and international recognition in August 2008 when John McCain surprisingly chose her has his running mate in the White House race, a role for which she was unready. Her lack of knowledge of domestic politics and international affairs was cruelly exposed by the media. She resigned as governor of Alaska in 2009 and has since concentrated on writing books, being a Fox News commentator and making profitable speeches. Later this year, she is to star in a documentary called Sarah Palin's Alaska.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order (Total 401 comments)

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
Showing first 50 comments | Show all comments | Go to latest comment
  • Deucalion2

    12 September 2010 6:18PM

    I am incredibly glad I don't live in America. Sure, Osbourne and Cameron aren't exactly paragons of excellence, but things could be so much worse.

  • ellaella

    12 September 2010 6:20PM

    There's nothing we American liberals would like better than Palin on the ticket. Nobody would be easier to defeat in the General.

    Won't happen, though. She'd have to subject herself to tough interviews, which she refused to do as a VP candidate. (Katie Couric asking her what newspapers she reads was not a "gotcha" moment as the Palindrones would like the world to think.)

    And I'd pay to see her try to debate Obama.

  • 700c

    12 September 2010 6:22PM

    God help us all i say and i am not even religious.

    Putting that lady in charge will surely result in massive riots and civil unrest.

    The bible belt has far too much "power" as it is. She is as thick as a brick and has absolutely no experience on the multi-national negotiating table.

    Give me Hillary, at least she has intelligence and wit to offer unlike Palin.

    California will not vote for her and neither will most of the left leaning demoncrats.

  • Mundusvultdecipi

    12 September 2010 6:22PM

    Please, please let her gain the Republican nomination, nothing is more guaranteed to produce a Democratic landslide.

    Democratrics must be praying for a Palin nomination.

  • RipThisJoint

    12 September 2010 6:26PM

    So let the stupid twat run. If she loses, maybe then she'll just go away and stfu. If she wins, then we're well and truly fucked and no use putting it off. Over to you, Erskine.

  • cichen

    12 September 2010 6:26PM

    Democratrics must be praying for a Palin nomination

    Wall Street will be paying for a Palin nomination, it's the only hope of an Obama victory.

  • dor35

    12 September 2010 6:35PM

    I thought "She'll never get the nomination" Then I remembered this is the country that elected a B list actor as president, votes in an Austrian to run a state with an economy the size of many European countries yet still seems to struggle to read a script and then re-elected GWB.

  • crinklyoldgit

    12 September 2010 6:35PM

    Some points

    1. She is pretty limited intellectually but she is quite able in putting over her points and connecting to her audience.

    2. Presidents are 90% symbolic. Even if she wanted to do something nuts, she wouldn't get to, although she might get to drag the consensus to one side or another.

    3. I think Obama would welcome her as an opponent. I think he would quite easily her as a one dimensional screeching harpie.

    4. There are are other, similar, but much more formidable characters waiting in the wings. I think she is probably a sacrifice; some kind of stalking horse to test the political temperature.

  • max867

    12 September 2010 6:35PM

    Oh, please - to pretend that a routine fundraiser will resolve anything is just silly. Palin will give the usual banal speech about taxes and guns and "taking back our country". And people will continue to run around speculating about what she'll do. And we won't know the answer for a year or more. The answer will depend, not so much on a dull dinner in Iowa, but on her assessment of whether Obama is beatable and her appetite for putting herself through the rigours of a campaign.

    A prediction, for what it's worth. She won't run. She's making too much money as the nut-fringe right's favourite celebrity. She won't want to give that up. She hates scrutiny. She hates criticism. So, unless she becomes the first candidate to campaign without doing press interviews or debates, I can't see her wanting to campaign. Plus, she doesn't actually enjoy governing - she walked out of Alaska half way through her term there.

    No, what she wants to be is a personality, fawned on wherever she goes. And as long as she stays in her cosy, Fox News, tea party echo chamber, she has that. The bad news is, she won't go away any time soon. The good news is, she won't expose herself to rejection at the hands of the electorate again.

  • Jibbernip

    12 September 2010 6:43PM

    How easy it is to pander to the lowest common denominator in the US.

    Just goes to show how looks count for a lot even though what you spout is bollocks.

  • tgrant

    12 September 2010 6:46PM

    She is a good example of the US. This is what 40% of the us is like no joke, I should know I am one. It is very unlikely that she would win, way to polarized, however I said that about little George W. and look what happened, not one but 2 terms. OMG

    I will say if she does win, (I pray not) it will be the end of the US. You will see a bloody revolution, and soon after separation if there is anything left to separate

  • Contributor

    MontanaWildhack

    12 September 2010 6:50PM

    I wish I had enough faith in my compatriots to believe that she's unelectable, but I told myself all of those things in 1980 about Ronald Reagan and that stupid sonofabitch won by a landslide.

  • JohnRussell

    12 September 2010 6:54PM

    In 2000 I remember laughing at the idea of George W. Bush as President - I mean really it was unthinkable that such a moron could get the top job.

    Ten years later I'm not laughing.

  • snoopster

    12 September 2010 6:54PM

    Great news for Obama and the Democrats if she does run. I don't expect her to though... she already found governing Alaska to be too much like hard work, hence she quit her job after two years, a chunk of which she'd been off with McCain trying to get elected.

  • frankswildyears

    12 September 2010 6:57PM

    “There's nothing we American liberals would like better than Palin on the ticket. Nobody would be easier to defeat in the General.”

    This kind of statement is not only wrong but dangerous. Complacency is not a good thing. America is on the verge of electing a demagogue in the next presidential election. There is a good chance that the Republicans will take back the house in November and if they do it will be filled with extremist who are only a few degrees from being fascist.

    If the US does elect Sarah Palin it will be the end of the US as a major player in the world. It's already happening, but this will put it over the edge.
    I do predict that is she won she would end up being impeached ans she has no regard for the Constitution or the laws of the land. Like Nixon she is obsessed with the media and destroying her opponents and critiques.

    For those who think she is to dumb to be president, well she's smart enough to get this far in life.

  • diddlyoompah

    12 September 2010 7:01PM

    If Tom Sharpe wrote this, she'd win. Everything else is playing like a Tom Sharpe story, so I think she'll win. C'mon, America is imploding anyway, let's have some fun.

  • digit

    12 September 2010 7:06PM

    I wish this could happen. I wish I wish I wish I wish I wish. And if she could be made president, it would be even better. America's a half-wrecked building on the verge of total collapse. It's time to stop trying to stick it together with scotch tape and knock it down completely -- and Palin's just the aberrant lunatic to do it. She is prime presidential material for this historical moment. Too bad she hasn't got a hope.

  • JohnCan45

    12 September 2010 7:09PM

    I hope she gets the GOP nomination, since it will make for an easier run for Obama. Obviously she has her fans, many of them very passionate, but she's nowhere near the 50% popular support she'd need to be President. Many Republicans don't even want her.

    If I were a big shot in the Republican party, I'd want someone like Mitt Romney to get the nod (though without being Mormon). He'd be solidly pro-corporation and big money, yet flexible enough on social issues that he wouldn't scare away moderates. I would not favour a fundamentalist or libertarian candidate, because they'd be lose cannons in these anxious times. I wouldn't be hot on a defense guy either, since they had one last time (McCain) and America needs to concentrate more on things at home now instead of costly conflicts abroad.

    Alternately I'd just want to sit it out for another term, since no one is going to shine in the White House given the present circumstances. It's pretty clear that's what the GOP establishment was thinking in 2008, given the poor field in the primaries. By 2016 though the economy should be on the upswing, the wars should be over or at least at a more acceptable level, and an establishment agenda would be safer to pursue. So let Palin have her run and get her ass kicked, then the grownups can step in.

Showing first 50 comments | Show all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Last updated less than one minute ago

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Case of the Pope

    by Geoffre Robertson £4.49

  2. 2.  Magnifier Flex Page

    £4.01

  3. 3.  Brooklyn

    by Colm Toibin £4.70

  4. 4.  Crazy Age

    by Jane Miller £11.24

  5. 5.  Human Chain

    by Seamus Heaney £9.74

Sponsored features

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed