(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Labour leadership hustings - as they happened

Live coverage as all five candidates hoping to become the next Labour leader go head-to-head at the TUC conference

Labour leadership hopefuls
Labour leadership hopefuls (from left): Andy Burnham, David Miliband, Diane Abbott, Ed Balls and Ed Miliband Photograph: Katie Collins/PA

5.21pm:

The first day of the TUC congress in Manchester has been vibrant, with unions making clear their intention to do what it takes to push the government to rethink its public spending cuts, and a Tory minister, Francis Maude, saying that the government was willing to listen to unions in recognition of their "legitimate" voice in the debate.

And it isn't over yet. Two hundred of the 700 delegates have found time to put in questions ahead of tonight's Labour leadership hustings, where attendance will be on a first come first served basis. The event has been organised by TULO (the Trade Union & Labour Party Liaison Organisation), which is the body representing unions affiliated to the Labour party.

The latest on the Labour leadership is that David Miliband, until now seen as the frontrunner, is rattled after a poll put him two points behind his younger brother, Ed.

It's technically the penultimate hustings, since all five contenders are scheduled to appear on the BBC Question Time programme on Thursday night. But it will be interesting to gauge the mood among an audience fed up with anti-trade union laws that stubbornly stayed in place under 13 years of Labour rule, as well as deep cuts under coalition rule. Will it get heated? We're going along to watch and blog, so stay with us. The event is being chaired by our very own Allegra Stratton.

5.44pm:

I'm in the Charter house suite, along with about 300 other people. All 250 seats are taken, with standing room only.

The five Labour leadership contenders have just had their photo taken with TULO chair Ton Woodley.

The seating arrangement from left to right (don't read anything into that) is: Andy Burnham, shadow health secretary, with Ed Balls, shadow education secretary next to him, and backbencher Diane Abbott flanking Woodley, who is joint general secretary of Unite, who is centre.

Allegra Stratton is next, followed by Ed Miliband, shadow climate change secretary, and his big brother, David, at the end. The two Milibands have taken their suit jackets off. Balls and Burnham are in dark blue and grey suits respectively, with different shades of red ties. Abbott has a stunning red outfit.

5.48pm:

Woodley is introducing tonight's event. He's doing a little run on the union's role in the Labour party's fortunes, their role in canvassing at elections, and the need for any Labour leader to appeal to the grassroots. We need a man or a woman to lead us through the difficult period, where cuts appear to be the only name of the game - a point unions hotly dispute.

5.56pm:

Questions have been grouped into subjects. First theme is cuts. Len McCluskey, assistant general secretary of Unite, raises the human costs of cuts, citing a few early examples.

What action will potential leaders take to protect services? It's hard to put a cigarette paper between their responses, since all five say it's important to challenge the government rationale for the cuts, the claim that it's all Labour's fault, that there is no other option.

Balls rightly pointed out that his views on an alternative economic strategy have even got Boris Johnson thinking, which is true if his Daily Telegraph column is to be believed. Abbott gets the biggest round of applause for making references to ideological attacks, and the fact that "we need to win this together". Straight out of the main conference centre, but it went down a treat with the audience.

6.07pm:

Allegra asks how the potential leaders intend to work with public and private sector unions.
All appear to veer off into talking more about how they would handle Labour opposition to the spending cuts agenda. David Miliband does suggest he wants to tap into the rich seam that affiliated trade unionists and Labour supporting members more generally can do to help the party at the grassroots to ensure the party wrest Lib Dem seats at the next election. He's up for marching, he's up for campaigning, (though he stays clear of striking), but it has to be twinned with political mobilisation for the party.

Ed Miliband makes clear he's not in favour of civil disobedience, as suggested by RMT leader Bob Crow. But he says he's in favour of lawful action (that obviously includes strikes). Abbott criticises David Miliband for suggesting that there is the public and unions to draw on for the political campaign. They're one and the same, says Abbott to spontaneous applause. She seems to be pretty popular with this crowd, or maybe those who rate her most are just more vocal. Tough to tell.

6.10pm:

A footnote. Abbott again got the loudest applause so they're liking the woman in red.

6.14pm:

Balls – he's rehearsing his argument – that economic recovery requires growth and jobs, not cuts. "I don't want to cut," he says, "I want to spend." You need to invest, he adds. A bit of heat now, as Burnham disagrees with Balls, saying the party needs to have credibility.

Ed Miliband is asked what would have happened if Labour had won the election. Miliband, who wrote the Labour manifesto, concedes there would have been some job losses (remember there was a commitment to halve the deficit within four years). But he hotly refutes the suggestion that the coalition is merely doing what Labour was going to do. It's simply not the same, says Miliband intensely.

6.16pm:

David M wonders why the coalition government changed the plan that Labour had in place before the election, with a "masochism" plan. The pace set by Alistair Darling was working, he argues. He points out that the disagreements on the panel which pale with the chasm between them and the Tory/Lib Dem coalition. He's well received by the audience on this one.

6.24pm:

Funding of political parties next. The trade union link and the party process at the Labour conference regarding the sense by grassroots delegates who feel the part has lost its way over years, with less democratic debate and decision-making as a result of a number of rule changes.

Ed Miliband says it has to be more than balloons and standing ovations, but about proper policy debate. Balls agrees that the party needs a forum where people can express views, however difficult for the leader to hear. He acknowledges the sense people have that conference pays lip service to influencing and shaping policy.

Burnham says people need to feel they have a stake in politics. He criticised the London style of politics - ie the capital being where it all happens, where it is all decided, prompting spontaneous applause. Abbott makes a dig about young guys in smart suits (who could she mean?), says she was against the Hayden Philips reforms on party funding and wants an end to long speeches by ministers at conference.

She cites the Gillian Duffy moment of the general election, which was widely seen as Gordon Brown's downfall. Abbott says what Duffy objected to was being called "that woman". She's got the point about the 'them' and 'us' within the party, to loud applause.

David Miliband just had a very robust clap but I'm afraid I missed what he said.

6.35pm:

David Miliband says debate, dialogue, listening, is the only way to sustain a movement.
Otherwise you lose the best ideas. Andy Burnham has been put on the backfoot re a media interview he gave this morning. He complained about the rules of the labour leadership contest. He doesn't think it's right that a Labour MP has more clout in their vote than grassroots members in the three way electoral college, and also the funding arrangements for the race denies those without large donors the right to compete for the leadership. This is what he was saying today.

Balls points out that this exclusion extends to standing for parliament, where you require a £10,000 deposit to stand. David Miliband, who has raised the most, says the party needs a leader who can raise money from donors because when they fight the Tories at the next election, they will have to fight a party with big backers. Miliband seeks to play up the small donations he has received, along with the much larger ones. Abbott quips at Burnham that it's a bit odd to stand in the race and then complain the rules are unfair. Abbott points out that she has far less campaign funding than anyone. I recall she recently gave an interview in which she complained about the unlevel playing field this created in the race, as it happens.

7.45pm:

Oh dear, dear readers, this has not been an IT success story. Apologies for the long silence since my last post - a technical misunderstanding took place, during which time, the leadership contenders were pitching full throttle for the union vote.

We pick up at the summing up phase, and Burnham has just sat down to loud applause after a passionate delivery. Before him, Abbott said it had been a pleasure to take part and, before you thought she was conceding defeat in that comment, piped up that she had more life experience, ie as a single mother for eighteen years. As for not looking like a leader, she said she hoped that in the 21st century, she looked precisely like a leader.

Balls says he's the heart and mind candidate and took head on someone saying that he was unpopular with the Daily Mail. Earlier, he had complained that Labour had lost its way by being too fussed about what the right-wing press said about their policies, rather than standing firm. Balls made a very funny joke about once being mistaken for Ed Miliband on the platform. Someone said it could have been worse, they could have confused you for his brother. He said that he retorted it could have been worse than that, he could have been mistaken for Abbott.

Ed Miliband does his turn, saying that he wants profound change for the party, including its relationship with unions. Not just with the leaders but in the constituencies. Miliband, who netted the support of the three largest unions, quips that he is not the choice of New Labour (his brother is, he doesn't say).

David Miliband says he's best placed to lead the party against the Tories. He's for the redistribution of power (it's true he did unsuccessfully push 'double devolution' to give communities more power). I wish I had a clap-o-meter, but I don't, so judging by my ears, the applause for each candidate was pretty consistent. During the course of the hustings, they all received their share of loud applause, though David Miliband perhaps a bit less than the rest, and Abbott somewhat more.

GMB leader Paul Kenny comes on the stage to wrap things up, praises the hustings, agrees with Balls that the party should be true to its beliefs and ignore the critical press, and agrees with David Miliband that the party should hail its achievements in office. But he doesn't fight shy of saying that there were some grim bits, such as learning that Labour ministers were lobbying Tories in Europe to vote against legislation that would have improved legislation for workers and unions. Tell us more, Mr Kenny. You get the impression he was referring to someone on the panel, but maybe not. Kenny ends by saying it's time to look forward for Labour. But who will spearhead that future. Only two weeks until we find out.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order (Total 35 comments)

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • GiveMeStrength2

    13 September 2010 6:03PM

    One of them:

    "Right we are all agreed that western civilisation and european culture should be destroyed and to a large extent we have been successful. The only remaining differences among us are over which "communities" should hold the balance of power in our multicultural utopia, and who to appease the most."

  • stevetyphoon

    13 September 2010 6:04PM

    @DorotheaS
    How would the Labour party, its supporters and the general public react when David M has to answer questions on his involvement/knowlege of extraordinary rendition and torture if he were the new Labour leader?
    There HAS to be a clean break from NuLabour for the Labour Party to gain back its core support.

  • GiveMeStrength2

    13 September 2010 6:07PM

    Wimmin, excpet muslims, although to be fair the burka is empowering to them.

    And we did not use the oppression of women made to wear the burka as a causus belli when invading Afghanistan. You must be mistaken

  • CliffordChallenger

    13 September 2010 6:08PM

    Mitchell Powers you are in good company. David Miliband spetl her name wrong on twitter.
    And if Ms Abbott exercised her right to send her children to private school, then she shouldn't try to be the socialist face of the Labour party as well.

    Obviously David Miliband is the most electable of the candidates which is why I voted for him 10 days ago. This campaign and vote seems to be going on for a long time.

  • qualitystreet

    13 September 2010 6:14PM

    David Miliband is panicking, he thought he was winning. he has started making ridiculous Blairish threats that Labour will be out of power for three elections, if he David Miliband is not leader.

    Now Ed Miliband has come to the fore and is the one with momentum, David should indeed be worried.

    A lot of Labour MPs said they would support David, because they thought he was going to win. Now, if it looks like Ed Miliband is the front runner, a lot of MPs will back him, because they want to be seen as backing the winner.

  • inkypaws

    13 September 2010 6:17PM

    I'm seeing Ed's inching ahead of his brother as more of a media story than a fact - although I'm liking that he seems marginaly less evasive under questioning than his brother. Maybe he spent less time learning from Blair :/

    Much as I think the elder brother will win, I still figured Ed would have his day in the sun ... so I made a lil' video of him dancing. This is what Ed'll could look like on the 26th :)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-S9ICFLvAQ

  • raymonddelauney

    13 September 2010 6:18PM

    If I had to put money on which one of the five went berserk with a meat cleaver, my money would be on Ed Miliband.

    He looks like he's been photoshopped into the picture from a Steve Bell cartoon.

  • Ballinger

    13 September 2010 6:26PM

    quality street is right.

    David Panicky. Not a good sign for someone aspiring to lead a country at war. He is shaky. Brother Ed seems to (I don't know) have a moral compass.
    Balls is balls. Burnham is too wet to burn'em.

    But we need someone who can speak plainly on international scene. With Ed we probably get Dave again!

    I am tilting towards Diane. Extreme times. Extreme measures. She would liven things up. She is not dull. That is important.

  • siff

    13 September 2010 6:36PM

    The first comment on here actually appears to be ENTHUSIASTIC for David Milliband. Some mistake surely ?
    Unles you are Dorothea Milliband .
    A sort of grim and depairing inevatability, yes, but enthusiasm ? About what ? More of the Tony Blair type self satisfied same.?
    I promised my self 10 years ago never to vote New Labour, looks like that still stands.
    Still. no more desperate than voting Lib Dem I REALLY got succered there

  • SeanThorp

    13 September 2010 6:42PM

    Really you wouldn't want any of these awful clowns to be running your local supermarket let alone your country.

    Parliamentary Labour Party 1906-1995 RIP

  • unclearleo

    13 September 2010 6:45PM

    I think the Labour Party should be run from now on as a five-way coalition. They all look so damn handsome its too hard to choose. Especially Mr Balls ("excuse me young man, but could you arrange some more bread for the top table?)

  • edougall

    13 September 2010 6:46PM

    So Mandelson, Blair, Andrew Rawnsley and the Lib Dem groupies on The Observer have all made it known, to differing degrees, that Miliband major is their choice. To crown it all is news that Murdoch minor has invited David Miliband out to dinner.

    How could I possibly agree with that line-up? It's nice to have the rightness of my decision (anyone but DM) so comprehensively confirmed.

    Organisers of the Edinburgh Fringe recently announced its best joke, but they can't have heard Miliband major's offering: I am the candidate of unity (I paraphrase).

    Should he get the job, policies based on his Blairite tendencies, while gaining the approval of some commentators, would cause many of those who give generously of their spare time in working to elect a Labour government, to finally give up on the party in disgust.
    It will be a betrayal of those least able to fend for themselves unless policies based on our traditional principles emerge as a result of the leadership election.

  • raymonddelauney

    13 September 2010 6:46PM

    David Miliband, who has raised the most, says the party needs a leader who can raise money from donors because when they fight the Tories at the next election, they will have to fight a party with big backers.

    Oh no .. where's Jack Dromey?

    Perhaps young David could call upon Chai Patel, Sir David Garrard and Barry Townsley to save him looking down the back of the sofa.

  • Stiles

    13 September 2010 6:55PM

    This has also been on at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11290656

    Diane and Ed Balls are clearly the best (if you are a socialist that is), followed by Ed M.

  • Ballinger

    13 September 2010 7:02PM

    I am not looking for socialism. I am looking for moral character. No point in getting a weak or variable character who happens to be a socialist. Ed Balls wavers. He's a pleaser who doesn't please me. Dianne is respected. And she is ready for it.

  • Rainborough

    13 September 2010 7:18PM

    The rational approach would have been for the party members democratically to discuss and agree the policies they want the new leadership to put before the country, and only then look around for an appropriate person to lead he campaign to win support for them. But of course, this is New Labour: endemically deferential and irretrievably tainted.

  • Todyo94

    13 September 2010 7:50PM

    Ballinger:

    Mmmm, toast : )

    I believe that Tory opinions are being discounted as Tories have no say in the choosing of the leader. It's like asking Osama Bin Ladens opinion during a Papal election.

    I'd say Ed, because I find him to be the right combinaton of "likely to win" and left-wing ideology.
    And whilst I'm at it, I'd say Balls for Chancellor.

  • qualitystreet

    13 September 2010 8:06PM

    Ed Balls talks of an ' alternative economic strategy. Didn't Tony Benn present the alternative economic strategy in 1976 which consisted of: reflation, high public spending, and compulsory banning agreements with industry.

    What is Ed Balls' alternative economic strategy?

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Find your MP

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Last updated less than one minute ago

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism

    by Ha-Joon Chang £15.00

  2. 2.  Journey

    by Tony Blair £18.75

  3. 3.  Half the Sky

    by Nicholas D Kristof £9.74

  4. 4.  Revolution 1989

    by Victor Sebestyen £9.74

  5. 5.  View from the Foothills

    by Chris Mullin £7.49

Sponsored features

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed