(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Former Lehman boss defiant before official inquiry

Dick Fuld admits 'poorly timed business decisions and investments' but insists Lehman Brothers addressed those issues prior to its collapse

Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld
Dick Fuld was known as 'the gorilla' for his uncompromising style. Photograph: AP

The former Lehman Brothers boss Dick Fuld will deliver a defiant defence of his management of the defunct Wall Street bank today, telling an official inquiry that the firm's 2008 bankruptcy was down to false rumours about a solvency crisis, uncontrollable market forces and a refusal by the US government to come to the rescue.

Fuld, nicknamed "the gorilla" for his uncompromising style, has kept a low profile since Lehman imploded two years ago in a spectacular collapse that sent global financial markets spiralling into their worst crisis since the second world war.

In written evidence ahead of an appearance today in front of the bipartisan US Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Fuld concedes: "In retrospect, there is no question we made some poorly timed business decisions and investments."

But he insists that the bank "addressed those mistakes" and got back to a strong equity position prior to the fateful September weekend when Lehman was obliged to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Fuld says Lehman had no "capital hole" of $30bn (£19.4bn) to $60bn as claimed by critics and that, conversely, it had positive equity in its final days of $26.7bn. Mindful of an upcoming credit tightening, he says the bank took prudent precautions including decreasing its exposure to less liquid assets during 2008 by almost 50%, writing down asset values by $25bn and raising $3.8bn in equity capital.

But in the aftermath of Bear Stearns's collapse in March 2008, he says Lehman was left as the next smallest Wall Street bank and was "subjective to increasingly negative and inaccurate market rumours".

"This loss of confidence, although unjustified and irrational, became a self-fulfilling prophecy and culminated in a classic run on the bank starting on 10 September, 2008, that then led Lehman to file for bankruptcy four days later," says Fuld.

The 64-year-old banking veteran, who now has a small New York-based financial consulting firm called Matrix Advisors, is highly critical of the Federal Reserve and other government regulators who declined to step in and salvage Lehman Brothers.

Fuld says he asked for permission to convert Lehman into a bank holding company with a federal guarantee and an ability to bolster its capital by taking deposits from customers, and he urged a ban on naked short-selling. These requests were denied to Lehman but later granted to other struggling investment banks. Furthermore, he says the Fed refused to open its "discount window" providing cheap capital until it was too late.

"Lehman's demise was caused by uncontrollable market forces and the incorrect perception and accompanying rumours that Lehman did not have sufficient capital to support its investments. All of this resulted in a loss of confidence, which then undermined the firm's strength and soundness," says Fuld. "Other firms were hurt by their plummeting stock prices and widening CDS [credit default swap] spreads. But Lehman was the only firm that was mandated by government regulators to file for bankruptcy."

For all his defiance, Fuld could face a rough ride from the FCIC, which is chaired by a former Democratic state treasurer of California, Phil Angelides. The politicians and experts probing the crisis are likely to ask about a controversial accounting trick known as "repo 105" which was criticised by a court-appointed bankruptcy examiner as a technique used by Lehman to mask the size of its liabilities.

Fuld and his wife, Kathleen, spend part of their time now in self-imposed exile on a ranch near Sun Valley, Idaho. The former Lehman Brothers chief was paid more than $310m between 2000 and 2007. But in a sign of straightened financial circumstances following Lehman's collapse, the couple auctioned off a $20m personal collection of abstract drawings including art by Willem de Kooning and Barnett Newman.

The Lehman boss has stuck consistently to his line that the Bush administration ought to have rescued the 158-year-old bank, which was eventually dismembered, with much of its US operation bought by Barclays. Asked by a congressional committee in late 2008 why, in his view, regulators had allowed Lehman to go bust, Fuld replied: "Until the day they put me in the ground, I will wonder."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • NE555 NE555

    1 Sep 2010, 4:14PM

    But in a sign of straightened financial circumstances following Lehman's collapse, the couple auctioned off a $20m personal collection of abstract drawings including art by Willem de Kooning and Barnett Newman.

    In other words he still has more money than most people would need or even want, and he appears as arrogant as most of his ilk in the financial sector.

    There is also the question as to why Goldman Sachs survived , stronger political connections? Perish the thought.

  • feudi feudi

    1 Sep 2010, 4:24PM

    Ahhh, the arrogance of the very, very wealthy! It is easy to become as rich as Fuld is you have the connections he had inside the banking system. No matter how badly you perform, just get a fed bailout and push your incompetence onto the backs of the taxpayers. Fuld is the poster child for all the "numerati", i,e., those empty Armani suits who ran the world's economy into the ditch. He doesn't belong in splendid isolation...he belongs in jail.

  • FWFreitag FWFreitag

    1 Sep 2010, 4:36PM

    The lunacy of his thought process is that he expected the US Gov't. to back them when it was their fault to begin with. How is it that he can "expect" the Gov't. to step in and "save" the company when it was their own risk taking that got them into trouble. The problem stems for de-regulation of the banking and investment industry on a whole. Thanks Bush!!

  • LeeWoods LeeWoods

    1 Sep 2010, 5:26PM

    Lehmans has turned into a millstone around all our necks. Or rather the fuss made by the financial community over the US governments decision to let Lehmans fall has turned it into a millstone.

    Reading the financial press, you'd think that the US government decision to let Lehmans fail caused the financial crisis and not the dodgy dealings of financial organisations prior to that failure.

  • LesterJones LesterJones

    1 Sep 2010, 5:28PM

    Contributor Contributor

    Fuld and his gang were losers in the (Wall) street gang wars and that's why he screaming about his belief that:

    the Bush administration ought to have rescued the 158-year-old bank

    Well he is half right about that...bankers like him expect government bailouts in the socialisation of risk aspect of neo-liberal economics...

    ...but what he didn't realise is that other thieving capitalists were working against him (with the government) to further consolidate the banking industry and condense power...

    ...poor old Fuld suffered the same shafting everyone else got and he's not been used to that (unlike the rest of us)...

    ...But a man thats done what he's and describes it as poorly timed business decisions deserves to be shafted...or imprisoned at least...

  • Vanman Vanman

    1 Sep 2010, 5:30PM

    With the rich and the powerful always a little patience:). Or rather not. What a bunch of asinine wankers.

    I just saw Michael Moore's Capitalism. Lovely stuff. Since the mid 70's productivity in Western manufacturing has risen 45% but rewards to the workforce has only gone up 1%. The rest has been appropriated by management and shareholders who have seen incomes rise by 600% (I think).

    This has meant that critical mass consumption has required credit - raised on housing - and now that has hit a brick wall we are facing a huge depression caused by under consumption. The double dip is a racing certainty.

    This is all completely predictable and follows the pattern of the crash/depression of the 1930's except that back then there was no mass debt overhang - this time it will be worse.

    These champions of the global financial and political establishment are as astoundingly stupid as they are greedy.

  • MrScreenBubble MrScreenBubble

    1 Sep 2010, 5:31PM

    Fuld...telling an official inquiry that the firm's 2008 bankruptcy was down to...a refusal by the US government to come to the rescue.

    Good! No government in a true capitalist society comes to the rescue of any business. To do so goes against the core definition of capitalism and the free market system. Because what we witnessed when the government comes to the aid of Corporate America is the execs pocket the help cash and their company still implodes. Screw Corporate America! They're the root cause of most, of not all, of America's ills.

  • LesterJones LesterJones

    1 Sep 2010, 5:36PM

    Contributor Contributor

    Vanman

    Since the mid 70's productivity in Western manufacturing has risen 45% but rewards to the workforce has only gone up 1%. The rest has been appropriated by management and shareholders who have seen incomes rise by 600%

    The only answer to this is political change...and the only impetuous for this comes from the people...

    People have to politically unite against the outrageous exploitation of capitalism...

    There is no other answer...

  • sPiteful sPiteful

    1 Sep 2010, 6:52PM

    I really and firmly believe that words have no meaning when dealing with these kind of impostors and charlatans!
    Confiscation of their assets yesterday, and let the people decide for their fate..

    If i am not mistaken this is the quintessence of demo-cracy!

  • MrScreenBubble MrScreenBubble

    1 Sep 2010, 7:07PM

    LesterJones
    1 Sep 2010, 5:36PM

    The only answer to this is political change...and the only impetuous for this comes from the people...

    People have to politically unite against the outrageous exploitation of capitalism...

    There is no other answer...

    IMO, politics and political change won't be enough. Only setting fire to Wall Street will cleanse this cancer from America.

  • StGallen StGallen

    1 Sep 2010, 7:50PM

    The comments left behind by several readers betray ignorance of the underlying causes.

    1. It was during Clinton's tenure that the govt put pressure on the banks to lend to sub-prime borrowers.
    2. The abolition of the Glass-Steagall act removed vital barriers between financial speculation and investors savings.
    3. As early as the 80s, there was a gradual leaning towards deregulating the markets initiated by "markets know best" Greenspan.

    In a culture of deregulation and risk taking, exacerbated by the pressures of Wall St to perform quarter-to-quarter, there is little room for long-term planning.

    Lehman was let go by ex-Goldman Paulson for no other reason other than to avoid getting grilled by certain senators and the media. After bailing out Mae and Mac and gifting Bear Stearns in a 'Jamie Deal', they simply did not want to take the heat.

    Ultimately, it happened to the wrong guy at the wrong time. Could have been AIG or Merril Lynch. Several hundreds of Lehman and other jobs could have been saved if alone the SEC moved faster to ban short-selling, which it eventually did (if I remember correctly).

    And as for begrudging Fuld his pay, he demands to get paid and get away with what other top bankers are making. How is this different from the differences in wages across geographies? How many of you would work for a Somalian's wage?

    @VANMAN
    re the comment about Moore's Capitalism, it was the managers who boosted productivity by their initiatives. The question to be decided then is the scale of compensation. Since we are all part of the system, who would impartially evaluate it and how?

    America and the global economy would be healthier (if not necessarily wealthier) if :

    a. the anti-trust laws were strictly enforced. This would prevent large companies from gobbling up smaller ones thus raising entry barriers impossibly higher and giving no incentive to innovate. In a financial winter such as this, people could just start their own businesses instead of having to beg for work.

    b. Americans just give up voting on petty political issues. I strongly feel Ron Paul's conservative policies would get americans on track faster. The immigration issue is a joke for example. Just allow highly skilled and educated individuals to immigrate instead of letting in anyone on two-legs. Quality immigrants could be encouraged to settled down in places where real estate has been hit hardest such as detriot. They could create jobs, buy real estate ...

    /end rant.

  • GreatGrandDad GreatGrandDad

    1 Sep 2010, 8:09PM

    For 'Vanman', re 5:30 PM:

    This is all completely predictable and follows the pattern of the crash/depression of the 1930's except that back then there was no mass debt overhang - this time it will be worse.

    The pattern may be similar, but the events occur in circumstances that are totally dis-similar.

    The irrational exuberance of over-confidence in 'markets only go up' in 1928/9 occurred at a time when oil was pouring out of the ground almost for free. So, not only was there no mass debt overhang (as you say) but also the economy was getting injection of wealth.

    The loss of self-confidence that caused the slump of the 1930s was cancelled when that wealth started being put to work building ships and aircraft and making munitions for WWII.

    This slump will not end.
    There is contraction setting in now in the supply of energy and ores.

    What is needed is some thought being given to how well-being can be had during ongoing times of material-wealth contraction.

    The best hope is that folk develop pride in being thrifty, frugal, and living-within-their-means.

    I am optimistic that the next generation will do so, when they have seen off the generations of Fulds et al, and their followers.

    That's going to be a messy time, though.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Our selection of best buys

Lender Initial rate
First Direct 2.99% More
HSBC 2.99% More
HSBC 2.19% More
Name BT Rate BT Period
NatWest Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Egg Card 0% Until 01/10/2011 More
Provider Typical APR
Alliance & Leicester Personal Loan 7.8% More
Sainsbury's Personal Loan 7.8% More
Santander Personal Loan 7.9% More
Provider AER
ING DIRECT 2.75% More
POST OFFICE 2.75% More
HALIFAX 2.60% More

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Human Chain

    by Seamus Heaney £12.99

  2. 2.  Red Men

    by John Williams £16.99

  3. 3.  Red Plenty

    by Francis Spufford £16.99

  4. 4.  Finkler Question

    by Howard Jacobson £18.99

  5. 5.  It's All About the Bike

    by Robert Penn £16.99

Sponsored features

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed