(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)



Archive for the 'EU matters' Category

h1

Could Europe blow Brown off course?

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Can the government avoid the Greek debt trap?

After the recent EU summit, a reporter asked Gordon Brown if UK taxpayers’ money would be go towards a rescue package for Greece. He said, after a lengthy preamble that “the discussions at the moment are within the euro area”. That’s very far from a denial.

The Greek government’s funding crisis could spread to Britain’s political scene rapidly in two obvious ways: if the UK forms part of a bail-out for Greece, and if the Greek situation becomes a full-blown crisis with the financial markets then turning negative on other countries running substantial deficits, as Britain is.

I find it difficult to believe that any British government facing a general election within four months - especially one staring defeat in the face - would put taxpayers’ money up to support the Greek exchequer.

It would be an almost impossible sell to the public who were being told that cuts are necessary here. And yet, why didn’t Brown just issue a straight-out denial?

So far, little more than warm words have come out of Brussels in support of Greece. Unless the European leaders are willing to risk Greece defaulting, that cannot remain the case. Without solid guarantees of some nature, Greece will find it very difficult to refinance its debt, at least, at an affordable price. The question is, who will give the guarantees and what will they have to commit to in so doing? We may find out soon - the EU Finance ministers meet on Monday.

The danger is that Brown does a bit of a Woodrow Wilson: putting the achievement of a resolution to the crisis above his being able to sell that agreement to his domestic audience.

Unlike Wilson, he wouldn’t even have the excuse that his country was vital to the settlement - but in the confines of international conferences it would be easy to miss the wood for the trees.

The timing is also tricky for the government. It would be nice to put things off until after the election. Unfortunately, that may not be possible. Leaving aside the markets’ disinclination to work to politicians’ timescales, an unusually large proportion of Greece’s debt matures within the next few months. If the markets believe that the governments won’t solve the problem in time, it’s quite possible that all the countries with high budget deficits will face a spike in borrowing costs.

Theoretically, that shouldn’t affect Britain too much. The UK should have no problem servicing its debt, partly because it’s outside the Euro and therefore has more flexibility and partly because of the much longer timescale of the debt profile. Markets, however, are not always rational and if one European sovereign default were to take place, a likely reaction on the markets would be to look for the next one and the one after. Real-world interest rates - the ones passed on to mortgage borrowers - could end up rising just as the election campaign’s getting serious.

It will require delicate diplomatic footwork from Brown, Miliband and Darling to ensure that a solution is found that prevents Britain from getting caught up in the crisis (which really means preventing the crisis in Greece getting any worse), but which doesn’t cost the taxpayer anything. If they can do it, the issue will become an esoteric financial matter of interest to hardly anyone; if they can’t, it could be one of the biggest topics of the election.

David Herdson



h1

Could UKIP switchers cost Dave his majority?

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

But will it be the same in the marginals?

Just looking at the detailed data for the latest ComRes poll and we see the dynamic that is causing the Tory totals to fall and is putting into question what seemed to be the forgone conclusion of a Tory majority.

For helpfully the firm is the only one of the pollsters where it’s possible to see the switching to the minor parties from what respondents said they did at the general election - and the news for the Tories is not good.

For in the latest survey more than five Tory voters in a hundred from 2005 are now saying that they will vote for the anti-EU party and that proportion seems to have risen since Cameron’s Lisbon referendum announcement.

Now I know we are dealing with very small numbers here and we have to look at more than just one poll - but the trend seems to be developing.

By comparison almost none of the Tory voters from 2005 questioned in ComRes’s February and March 2009 surveys said they were going to abandon their choice of four years earlier and switch to UKIP.

Going from almost zero to more than five in a hundred is bound to have a big impact.

This is a serious move so close to an election - the question is whether on general election day in the LAB>CON marginals such voters will continue with their choice or could they return home to their former allegiance.

The Tory hope is that where it matters then the priority of voters will be to kick Mr. Brown out rather than register an anti-EU protest.

But will that happen? My guess is that we’ll still be talking about this as the results are coming in.

  • PaddyPower have a market on the total number of votes UKIP will get. The current favourite is the 11/8 that it will jump from the 605,973 of 2005 to between three quarters of a million and a million.
  • Mike Smithson



    h1

    How PB’s 50/1 star tipster missed out on making a bet

    Friday, November 20th, 2009

    And is this a first for Mail and Guardian front pages?

    For political punters, surely, the saddest aspect of the selection of Baroness Ashton as the first EU High Commissioner is that PB’s Morus (AKA Greg Callus) who posted his exclusive tip here on November 9th, was unable to place a bet himself. He’s currently on a Fulbright scholarship at Columbia University in New York and there’s a very strict ban on US residents betting with foreign bookmakers

    So Greg would have risked being thrown out of the US if he’d sought to get some money on with Ladbrokes - the only bookie at that point which was taking gets on her.

    PaddyPower, which was also running an online market, had not even got Ashton listed as a runner.

    So the main beneficiaries of what will surely be the best political bet of 2009 were those who were following the thread that night who acted fast. For there’s one thing for certain about betting opportunities like this - they don’t last long and when you see them you have to move.

    Knowing Greg as I do I knew that he would not have put his head above the parapet in the way he did unless his information was good - so I was one of the fortunate ones.

    Well done to Ladbrokes for settling the market so quickly - though I guess that they made a packet on it because all the early indications were that David Miliband was going to get the job and I’m sure that he dominated the betting. Cathy Ashton, who is the spouse of YouGov boss Peter Kellner, was still at 6/1 when the market closed.

    As to the political impact of the news - both the Guardian and the Mail have precisely the same headline “The Great EU Stitch-up”. That must surely be a first for two parts of the media which have very different backgrounds and differing views of Britain the EU.

    The Mail’s secondary headline points to possible political problems back home -Low-profile Labour crony is made EU foreign minister - so a fanatical Belgian federalist can become President”.

    The report goes on to note that Baroness Ashton was until October 2008, Labour’s leader in the House of Lords, and had played a key part in getting the Lisbon Treaty through the upper house in the face of calls for a referendum.

    I don’t think we’ve heard the last of this one.

    Mike Smithson



    h1

    Is Blair back in the frame again for the EU job?

    Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

    Should you be getting your money on Tony

    With decision time getting very close in the EU Presidency race there’s an intriguing blog this morning from the Telegraph’s Ben Brogan.

    He writes “… this is what I hear. Gordon Brown is still batting ..even though he could have pulled the plug, and is doing another round with the other EU leaders even now. His point to them is quite robust: after weeks of messing about with rumpy pumpy Belgians and other non-entities, who do they really want? When the manoeuvring is stripped out, who is their first choice? Weirdly, 12 or 13 say Blair. Strip out the ones who are dead against – Belgium, Luxembourg and Austria (now there’s a triple alliance to conjure with – talk about surrender monkeys) – and the Swedes who hold the presidency and that leaves you a sizeable majority and the chance of winning a few more over.”

    Both PaddyPower and Ladbrokes are still taking bets. The former has 6/1 while the latter is quoting 5/1 on Blair though they won’t let you put much on.

    Mike Smithson