(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Martin O'Neill - the charming dictator who finally lost patience

Aston Villa and Randy Lerner have managed to drive away their most important asset

Martin O'Neill
Martin O'Neill's unhappiness at Aston Villa has been clear since the 7-1 defeat by Chelsea last season. Photograph: Nick Potts/PA

It was a febrile day at Aston Villa's Bodymoor Heath training ground and you could feel a rift coming. In the aftermath of his team's 7-1 hammering at Chelsea, Martin O'Neill was trying to pull off the hard PR trick of affirming passion for the job while also using a large media gathering to warn the club's owner his fidelity to the claret and blue was finite.

This was no easy mission. Realising his threat to leave was a bit too stark, O'Neill later issued a statement restating his loyalty to Randy Lerner's philanthropic mission. But there was no mistaking the Villa manager's agitation later in a private conversation as he contemplated the possibility that Gareth Barry's sale to Manchester City the previous summer had started a trend that would turn Lerner's parish into a dispenser rather than an acquirer of talent.

James Milner's move to one of the Manchester monsters was already being touted and the talk around Villa Park was of Lerner being spooked by the rise of Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur and how few rungs an £80m investment in players raised a club on the Premier League's greased ladder. The word was that the Quiet American had looked at the financial crash and decided English football was merely a bonfire for his bucks.

O'Neill turned his thoughts to the possibility that Milner, Ashley Young and others might be auctioned off along with Villa's recently restored ambitions. "If that situation did develop that wouldn't necessarily mean I would go and down tools and say, 'Well, listen, we can't go any further,'" he said. "What you would do is see if you can come up with some other ways, maybe through the scheme here with the younger players coming through, maybe with a bit of trading here and there, maybe taking a risk with a major player to be transferred [out] to sort things out. You wouldn't just down tools. It's not been in my nature to do that.

"I couldn't envisage that sort of scene – just throwing the toys out of the pram. I feel maybe I should have a say in my career as much as anyone else – that was the point I was trying to make [in his earlier press conference]. Actually I didn't make it too cleverly, but it doesn't really matter."

Five days before the start of a new Premier League campaign, O'Neill's willingness to compromise expired, with dire implications for Villa and not especially good ones for him. At 58, he has at least one top appointment left in him but in the last few weeks two major boats have sailed without him. Fabio Capello's survival as England manager was one puff of receding smoke and Roy Hodgson's elevation from Fulham to Liverpool shut down another ideal vacancy.

Spend proper time with O'Neill and you see that his main managerial quality is a superhuman talent for motivation, for making journeymen feel like royalty, for unlocking football's spirit in players who may have been more used to making up the numbers. This sounds a good antidote to the malaise of England's low self‑esteem and to the moroseness that settled over Anfield before Hodgson arrived to blow it away. The saddest note in O'Neill's sudden resignation is that none of the elite managerial jobs in Britain look to be heading his way any time soon unless Sir Alex Ferguson stands down and Manchester United turn from Scotland to Northern Ireland for their inspiration.

Mourinho-esque career plotting has never been O'Neill's style. He was employed at Villa on a rolling one-year contract and calls himself a "typical Irishman without a long-term plan". On that tense day at Bodymoor Heath, he was plainly wounded by a surge in hostility from some Villa fans and bloggers in the wake of the collapse at Stamford Bridge on 27 March. He said: "I don't have an agent, I've never had an agent, I might be the only manager in Europe who doesn't have an agent. I've got a lawyer who would look over my contract at the end of the day, but I do the negotiations and therefore in terms of self-promotion I don't think I would have ever done that.

"What I should do, I should really consider my value a wee bit more. That's sounds big-headed, because I said in my time of trying to fight back that I have been a breath of fresh air to these people, because this club was totally disaffected four years ago."

His message was that managers "should not be self-deprecating to the extent that what happens is that people hammer the crap out of you". In retrospect the parting was foreshadowed by that cri de coeur. Each day of summer brought Milner's departure closer. A law graduate, O'Neill's nose for evidence was telling him Villa were becoming dis-investors just at the point where City and Spurs were redoubling their efforts to break up the cartel.

He is not a promoter of youth for its own sake. He welcomes to first-team action only those youngsters who are ready to contribute to points accumulation. The rest can amuse themselves with their studies or at Alton Towers. So he was never likely to agree to an influx of teenagers into the starting XI while a machete was applied to the wage bill.

An autocrat with a winning way – a charming dictator who observed the power of psychology in his playing days under Brian Clough – O'Neill might be accused by some Villa fans of protecting his own reputation by bailing out now. City's huge investments and the Harry Redknapp-authored transformation of Spurs hardly enhanced Villa's chances of improving on three consecutive sixth-place finishes: a respectable return, given the weight of money in front of them.

But self-interest will have played only a small role in the ending of the Villa revival. This looks more old-fashioned: a rupture based on principle. Milner was not Villa's greatest asset, nor Young. That honour belonged to O'Neill and now they have driven him away.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • BishopBurt BishopBurt

    9 Aug 2010, 8:58PM

    I don't remember feeling this sad when my ex left me! Back to mid table mediocrity, and nothing to look forward to except a chance to beat the Blues, and then losing to the Blues on account of a goalkeeping howler ..... :(

  • population population

    9 Aug 2010, 9:01PM

    I don't think O'Neill had it in him to take them much further, but in reality they will nosedive without him. Who can they honestly expect to attract to the role of Manager without a red cent to spend? Me thinks Southgate or some equally inept chap will be holding a claret and blue scarf aloft in front of the cameras any day now.......

  • ChinnyChinChin ChinnyChinChin

    9 Aug 2010, 9:02PM

    Villa need the comedy stylings of Sven-Goran Eriksson to stop the inevitable slide back to being England's most boring club.

    Perhaps it's the way the claret and blue looks like a murky brown flash when the players are running about, but there's something so very dreary about Aston Villa that's hard to pin down. They just seem to be the ultimate in Premier League mediocrity. Neither bad enough to provide entertainment, or good enough to challenge, without the more exciting players that prevents Everton from being considered as dull. O'Neill had them operating fairly well in recent years, but now it seems it's all gone pear-shaped.

  • vastariner vastariner

    9 Aug 2010, 9:05PM

    This looks more old-fashioned: a rupture based on principle. Milner was not Villa's greatest asset, nor Young. That honour belonged to O'Neill and now they have driven him away.

    Hang on, he was given eye-watering amounts of money to spend, to the extent that Villa, technically, are insolvent. Is it that bad that a chairman wants to recoup some of the investment he has made, when not only do they look as far from the Champions League as they did three years ago, but when they DID get into Europe the manager decided effectively to withdraw? And to resign 5 days before the season starts looks a bit selfish mixed with toy-hurling.

  • BusinessMen BusinessMen

    9 Aug 2010, 9:06PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Laffin Laffin

    9 Aug 2010, 9:08PM

    The best manager never given a great team. 2 league cups with Leicester have been my high point up until now.

    Don`t worry Martin, I`ll follow which ever club you manage; I love your style.

  • Corinthian11 Corinthian11

    9 Aug 2010, 9:11PM

    I've a lot of respect for O'Neill. His best Villa side were a match for most teams on their day... his departure illustrates the massive gulf between the teams who can make a realistic challenge for a top two spot and teams trying to edge it into fourth position - because when Villa looked like they might make the breakthrough, the money sides came a'sniffing for their best players.

    Good luck to him from this Evertonian - and if Moyes ever hangs up his icy glare or moved to a money club (Not that he ever will!) - we could a lot worse than give O'Neill a ring.

  • OttoMaddox OttoMaddox

    9 Aug 2010, 9:12PM

    It's a pity but I can't blame him really. It must be incredibly demoralising trying to build a competitive team, only to see your best player or two sold off every summer, leaving you to start from scratch again. Still, can't blame Lerner. Anyone can see which way the wind is blowing in terms of financing and when you're up against teams with bottomless resources who don't seem to give a monkeys about making a profit, getting anything financial out of a club Villa's size is a remote possibility at best.

  • rwillmsen rwillmsen

    9 Aug 2010, 9:17PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • dominho dominho

    9 Aug 2010, 9:17PM

    Realising his threat to leave was a bit too stark, O'Neill later issued a statement restating his loyalty to Randy Lerner's philanthropic mission.

    It isn't philanthropic at all. Like all American businessmen involved in sports, Lerner is in English football to make money, hence why he has loaned finance to Villa with interest attached to it. With the club making annual losses, he knows the game is up; for Villa to get a sudden jump in revenue he needs them to be in the CL, but that requires 10s of millions more just for transfer fees, as well as further swelling of a already bloated wage bill (relative to the club's earnings).

    Americans need to stop wasting their money in European football because they don't get it. It is a totally different animal to US sport, with multiple competitions, relegations and promotions, close to zero regulation, unpredictable revenue streams yet costs which are 'sticky' due uncontrollable wages, transfer fees and so on.

  • spleenteam spleenteam

    9 Aug 2010, 9:17PM

    I really cannot see how Aston Villa or Randy Lerner drove O'Neill away - the fans adored him, and the chairman backed him up with serious cash.

    Ashley Young hardly came cheap as a pretty raw youngster at £9 million and didn't Downing cost £11 million?

    Then O'Neill went and had a hissy fit when fans dared to critiscise him for a 7-1 defeat. Just about every manager would have been under scrutiny after a result like that and he probably should have been a bit more humble.

    He is a very good manager, but to be honest I think he hit a glass ceiling. Winning things in Scotland and winning the League Cup with Leicester is a bit different from the challenge to get into the Top 4.

    Without even more money, O'Neill was going to struggle this season. Shame really as he seems a pretty good bloke and a pretty good manager.

    Don't worry, O'Neill be back though soonish - he'll go mad sitting on a sofa next to that drone Alan Shearer.

  • PaulLambert PaulLambert

    9 Aug 2010, 9:23PM

    They've been our (Everton's) closest rival over the last few years, and Moyes and O'Neill had some really good scraps.

    There was the game at Villa Park in April, where Everton went 1-0 up the 23rd minute, Villa equalised in the 72nd minute, Everton went 2-1 up the 74th minute, and Villa equalised again in the 91st minute. 2-2.

    There was the game at Villa Park in April 2009, where Everton were 2-0 with 20 minutes, Villa pulled one back, Everton went 3-1 up on 53 minutes, Villa pulled one back again on 55 minutes, then got a final equaliser on 66 minutes. 3-3.

    There was the game at Goodison Park in December 2008, when Villa went 1-0 up within the first minute, Everton equalised in the 30th minute, Villa went 2-1 up in the 54th minute, Everton equalised in the 90th minute, then Villa went 3-2 up in the 92nd minute. 3-2 Villa.

    Unsurpassed in terms of drama and excitement. Come backs, last minute winners, last minute equalisers, last minute equalisers *and* last minute winners in the same game. You name it. So some fond (or maybe not so fond) memories of O'Neill's Aston Villa from these quarters.

  • Aliceluma Aliceluma

    9 Aug 2010, 9:23PM

    If you look at O'Neills expenditure, both on transfers and on wages, you will find that Villa have ended up pretty much exactly where they should be. Neither better for their manager nor worse. Everything else is just personality. Like Harry redknapp, the fact that he is amiable towards some press members means he gets a better ride than other managers and his idiosyncrasies are overlooked. The main legacy O'Neill is leaving Villa is a wage bill that has increased unbelievably over his term in office. Some Villa fans may be blinded by suggestions that his net spending is not vast but the day to day cost of running the club has become untenable. The question for those undecided over whether his tenure ihas been successful is whether they think that the current Villa team is twice as good as the team of 2006-07. Because the wage bill suggest that this team should be...

  • diegowesterberg diegowesterberg

    9 Aug 2010, 9:24PM

    Considering Villa's wage bill I'd say three consecutive 6th place finishes represents a slight overachievement. Jumping ship is the right move for O'Neill: if the money's dried up the only way for them is down.

  • RussellGCM RussellGCM

    9 Aug 2010, 9:24PM

    So it seems that MON has thrown his toys out of the pram as Randy has told him he will not be getting any of Milner money to spend! Randy probably assessed the majority of his other dealings (as already noted above) anyway - and Villa have lost an arrogant, controlling, stubborn manager (part of the self destruct button genre) and have a naive Chairman that has now woken up and smelled the coffee. To be expected really and Villa will be better off in the long term

  • urbanm urbanm

    9 Aug 2010, 9:26PM

    ohmyumbrella
    9 Aug 2010, 9:05PM

    ColdCoffee

    Overrated? You don't know shit. Has made a huge difference to every team he's managed.

    Norwich City wants a word with you

    You obviously haven't studied the story of why O'Neill left Norwich and all that was going on at the club at the time.

    Doesn't reflect badly on O'Neill at all. Quite the opposite in fact.

  • painstructure painstructure

    9 Aug 2010, 9:26PM

    rwillmsen

    agreed.

    the capitulation to culture loses meaning when people do not have the basic access to the means of life.

    'we' are in a state of forgetfulness.

    people wake up when they are shook.

  • skybluesquirrel skybluesquirrel

    9 Aug 2010, 9:33PM

    He's a fine manager - can't believe the stick he's getting on here from certain quarters. As much as I dislike the Villa...

    You can't have the chairman sell your 2 best players (Barry and Milner) and still challenge the top 4. Its like Spurs with Jol/Berbatov all over again, only O'Neill is getting out before being pushed.

  • pauliewalnuts pauliewalnuts

    9 Aug 2010, 9:33PM

    Considering Villa's wage bill I'd say three consecutive 6th place finishes represents a slight overachievement. Jumping ship is the right move for O'Neill: if the money's dried up the only way for them is down.

    what? our wage bill is more than spurs and everton.

    o'neill has had resources previous villa managers could only dream of. i couldn't stand him, but david o' leary achieved 6th with a lot less than o'neill.

    lerner is right to look at the wages and fees of some of the player o'neill signed and never played. harewood, sidwell, reo-coker, shorey, beye, luke young cost millions but were either not good enough and were marginalised by o'neill.

    as soon as lerner stops throwing money at him, o'neill throws his toys out the pram because he would have been shown up as the tactically inept, miopic manager he is.

    enjoy the MOTD sofa martin.

  • MisterBlunt MisterBlunt

    9 Aug 2010, 9:33PM

    O'Neill did very well with the Villa.

    But I wondered last season where was he going to take them to? With the 'Sky Four' being joined by the Billionaires from ManCiteh. There was little hope of him getting Villa into the Top 4. In fact with Dodgy 'Arry at Spurs and the best man-manager of the lot at Everton, Villa looked likely to finish no better than 8th.

    Why would he stay for that?

    There was also the fact that he seemed one-dimensional in terms of tactics. More than once Villa could have got something out of a game with a different selection. But O'Neill stuck to his guns. And Villa lost points.

    He should have left at the end of last season.

    Villa now need a young firey continental manager to step in.

    Are there any suitable Spaniards or Germans available....... ?

  • knowyourself knowyourself

    9 Aug 2010, 9:35PM

    One of the hardest working managers who researched the opposition and provided his team with a clear strategy. He will be missed as he inspired his teams with confidence. Villa is heading for the Championship they will have a struggle given the failure to invest or to offer any hope for the future. Martin would have resuscitated the team but it would be a thankless task. Fattening frogs for snakes. Martin has made the right decision he is too good a manager to waste his talents on a thankless task.

  • binghambuy binghambuy

    9 Aug 2010, 9:35PM

    An excellent article Mr Hayward.

    It is, however, a little early to imply O’Neill has “thrown the toys out of the pram” don’t you think? We don’t know the details yet. I’m sure Martin wouldn’t leave villa now unless he felt his position was impossible. Villa have very little choice for their new manager.

    Many England fans have spent the summer bemoaning the fact that decent English players do not get a chance in the Premiership – well, here’s a club where they do play, develop and the team has flourished. That is in no small part thanks to Martin O’Neill. He will be a huge asset wherever he goes. If this had happened at the end of the season, he would probably be the new Liverpool manager by now.

  • Hoppolocos Hoppolocos

    9 Aug 2010, 9:35PM

    A good manager, not a great one (but very few are), but his reasons for resigning have yet to be publicied, so too early to say he'shad a hissy fot. If he has resigned due to financial restrictions then he needs a reality check. Villa, and virtually every other club, can't compete with the likes of Citeh. Either O'Neill and others have to learn to live with the financial realities eg why should Lerner piss all his money away in a fruitless attempt to compete with Citeh, Chelski, ManU - or get on with making the best of what he has. I suppose he may have hopes of landing the big gig with one of the aforementioned (which currently seems highly unlikely), but unless he does he's set to be disapointed again.

  • sokkie sokkie

    9 Aug 2010, 9:41PM

    A very overrated manager:

    58 years old
    Has never won a major trophy in a major league
    Has never managed an international side
    Has never managed in the Champions League
    Tries to position himself as a 'thinker' but never managed to complete his law course
    Talks the talk but has never really walked the walk

    He's very much a 'secod tier' manager, with limited tactical ability (as Arsene Wenger identified), relies on a big target man, hoofball and graft. Never seems to have moved on since the 1980s

    Yesterday's man. Time for Villa to move on.

  • Clarkycat Clarkycat

    9 Aug 2010, 9:41PM

    Presumably this split was based not on Milner leaving, which O'Neil already seemed to be resigned to, but also Young, especially if it's to Spurs. That would mean Villa losing two of their best players to -- on paper -- their two biggest rivals. In that sense, you can't really blame him.

    The question for O'Neil is where now? There aren't even clubs of Villa's stature looking for a manager, let alone bigger ones. And I can't help thinking that his counter-attacking tactics are two one-dimensional for him to get a job in Europe.

  • macman37 macman37

    9 Aug 2010, 9:42PM

    Amazing how often the first comment appears to be from some misanthrope with nothing of value to say; nor anything of value to do with their time. Hence the hovering over keyboards.
    I saw him play Gaelic football once - he was bloody good at that too.
    Coldcoffee is right - he has.

  • lefthalfback lefthalfback

    9 Aug 2010, 9:42PM

    If Randy Lerner cannot afford to compete, then the Prem has some serious problems.

    You cannot have A LEAGUE where 8 teams struggle to avoid relegation, 6 more dispute places 7-12 , 3 more dispute 4th and the final 3 play for the title.

    It really cannot last much longer like this.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed