(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Bank of England cuts UK economic growth forecasts

Bank governor Mervyn King says business and consumer surveys have weakened 'quite markedly'

A bus passes by the Bank of England
The Bank of England's inflation report. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

The Bank of England has cut its growth outlook for the UK economy, citing shaky business and consumer confidence, tight bank lending and the government's spending cuts.

The central bank's warning that Britain faces a protracted and "choppy recovery" came as official data showed a sharp rise in long-term unemployment and a smaller than expected fall in the number of people claiming jobless benefits.

The Bank's latest quarterly inflation report this morning suggested times will remain tough for many months to come and that it is in no hurry to raise interest rates from their record low of 0.5%. But with commentators increasingly debating whether the UK is headed for a double-dip recession, many economists said the Bank was still too optimistic on growth.

GDP chart shows the Bank of England's forecasts for economic growth Link to this interactive

The Bank's report, which forecasts economic prospects two years out, sees growth nearer 3% then, down from its previous prediction for about 3.5%. It also predicted inflation would fall to well below its 2% target in two years, helped by slack in the recovering labour market.

Presenting the report, governor Mervyn King said business and consumer surveys had weakened "quite markedly" recently, credit conditions were not easing as quickly as the Bank had expected and the government's fiscal measures would also dampen growth – although they would remove some long-term downside risks to the economy.

"Whereas crises occur suddenly, they fade only gradually," King said in his opening statement. "It will take many years before bank balance sheets and fiscal positions return to anything like normal. In the meantime they will act as headwinds to the recovery."

The pound weakened and government bond prices rallied on the report as traders raised their bets of rates staying on hold and of the Bank maybe even restarting its programme of quantitative easing – pumping electronic money into a flagging economy. Rob Carnell at ING Financial Markets said that although the Bank's growth forecast was still high, governor Mervyn King "sounded a good deal more cautious on growth than these figures suggest". ING sees growth at about half the Bank's forecast – 1.5% in 2011 and 2012.

King did indeed flag up a number of risks to the growth outlook. He echoed the government's emphasis that the UK economy needed to be rebalanced away from private and public consumption and towards net exports after the latest data this week showed imports continue to dwarf exports. But King warned that achieving that rebalancing "is likely to mean a choppy recovery".

The governor also highlighted troubles in key export markets, echoing concerns of British businesses that the US could be headed for a double-dip recession while the eurozone countries will struggle as their governments push through fiscal reforms. "There is great uncertainty about the outlook for both the United States and our most important trading partner, the euro area," said King.

But for business groups, King was not cautious enough. David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said the Bank needed to take better account of George Osborne's package of spending cuts and tax rises.

"The report's growth projections, although slightly lower than in May, are still too optimistic. They do not yet acknowledge the full impact of the deficit-reduction measures taken in the emergency budget," he said.

On price pressures, the Bank said the VAT rise announced in the budget and planned for January would keep inflation above its 2% target until the end of 2011 – significantly longer than projected in May. But then once that drops out of the equation inflation would fall back, probably to below the 2% target.

There was reassuring inflation news for the Bank in the labour market data this morning. Suggesting high headline inflation – at 3.2% – is not translating into big wage rises, average earnings were up an annual 1.3% in the three months to June – the smallest rise since January.

The fact that workers appear unable to get pay rises to match price pressures in the wider economy reflects ongoing slack in the labour market. The Office for National Statistics data showed the number of people claiming jobless benefits dropped by just 3,800 last month. That was well below forecasts for a 16,500 fall.

At the same time, less up-to-date figures on the employment level showed it enjoyed its biggest jump since 1989 in the three months to June, when the overall economy rebounded. But much of that was down to companies hiring part-time workers, suggesting they are still too nervous about the fragile recovery to hire full-time staff.

Many companies have complained that they are struggling to invest or hire new staff because credit conditions remain so tight. King conceded today that small businesses were bearing the brunt of constrained lending but he stopped short of blaming the banks.

"I'm not saying they should do more. It's an economic question," he said, citing the deep financial crisis and banks' own troubles getting funds.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • ronanpeter ronanpeter

    11 Aug 2010, 11:34AM

    Dear David Cameron and Nick Clegg

    As you know, we are living through economically tough times, and I hear a lot about how the economy can be brought back to stability and prosperity.

    However, have you ever considered that economic growth might actually not return? That we might have to build a societal infrastructure based on less?
    If so, what would be your plans to mitigate such a situation, to make sure that life can go on for your constituents in a future where "more each year" is no longer possible?

    Or alternatively, if you don't have any plans - are you 100 percent certain that growth and prosperity will ever return, and if so, why is it that you see no risk worth looking at?

  • Optymystic Optymystic

    11 Aug 2010, 12:07PM

    are you 100 percent certain that growth and prosperity will ever return, and if so, why is it that you see no risk worth looking at?

    Unfortunately they can be 100% certain that a large proportion of the electorate will be daft enough to vote for them, come what may. They do see risks, real risks in the threats to profits, those profits from which big bonuses are paid. The equally real risk of very high levels of unemployment exacerbated by their austerity policies is to them a price worth paying'

    It will take many years before bank balance sheets and fiscal positions return to anything like normal

    So just how big will the bonuses be then?

  • harmonyfuture harmonyfuture

    11 Aug 2010, 12:27PM

    Things which may grow by 3% in the next couple of years:
    Inflation, unemployment, the difference between Libor and High Street rates for borrowers, commodity prices, the size of the Budget deficit/National debt, repossessions, bankruptcies, bonuses and inequality.

    Things which will not grow by 3% in the next couple of years:
    Wages, savings, property prices for the majority of the UK.

    This growth is a tumor that kills its host.

  • kvlx387 kvlx387

    11 Aug 2010, 12:35PM

    I see the BoE forecast continues to be a figment of Mervyn King's imagination. He's been under-forecasting inflation and over-forecasting growth for about about two years. If you want to see how comical BoE forecasts have become, look here.

    I have a great deal more faith in the 2.3% growth in 2011 forecast by the OBR.

  • JohannVonEndon JohannVonEndon

    11 Aug 2010, 12:37PM

    Still the Bank of England does not get it.

    The central and critical fallacy at the heart of policy is the concentration on the cpi. When it was asset price inflation that caused the unsustainable liquidity bubble and the subsequent and inevitable collapse that happened in 2007/08 that in turn broke so many banks.

    Yet having listened to the jobsworths on both the panel and the 'journalists' interrogating them no one mentioned this huge elephant in the room - but it is absolutely crucial to any recovery that this matter is tackled as asset price inflation is hugely damaging the British competitiveness and will do for us completely unless it is firmly stamped upon. Yet the Bank and the journalists refuse to address the subject - in this they are both responsible for damaging the country.

  • tomboy32 tomboy32

    11 Aug 2010, 12:53PM

    GREAT GREAT CHART! Love it!
    Percentage increase in output oscilating between -1 and +6 percent year-on-year

    Anyone, ANYONE can work for the BoE. Just spray wide...

  • dell12 dell12

    11 Aug 2010, 1:06PM

    REAT GREAT CHART! Love it!
    Percentage increase in output oscilating between -1 and +6 percent year-on-year

    Anyone, ANYONE can work for the BoE. Just spray wide...

    They've covered almost every eventuality, they can't possibility be wrong!

    Why does every economy have to be based on growth? Surely we will reach a point whereby there's nowhere to grow and no new consumers to buy?

  • kvlx387 kvlx387

    11 Aug 2010, 1:07PM

    In case anyone is still has any faith in BoE forecasts, if you take the annual growth forecasts since 2007, there hasn't been a recessession! That's right folks, the BoE completely missed that one!

  • physiocrat physiocrat

    11 Aug 2010, 1:17PM

    Given the BOE's poor forecasting record, how can any credence be given to their latest one? Would you back one of their racing tips?

    A fundamental defect with everyone's models is that they do not separate out land as an entity in its own right, which, due to its inelastic supply (they don't make it any more) behaves in its own particular way in the market context.

  • Jibbernip Jibbernip

    11 Aug 2010, 1:18PM

    I am reminded of a caption printed on a shopping bag on a stall at WOMAD:

    'KEEP BUYING MORE SHIT OR WE ARE ALL FUCKED'

    How we continue to expand an economy based on ever depleting raw materials
    is beyond me. Too many people all chasing unsustainable lifestyles.

  • andyC123 andyC123

    11 Aug 2010, 1:21PM

    I haven´t seen the source of the chart, but it´s looks like a display of probability. The darker the line the more likely the out come.
    So the real forecast is between 2.5% and 3.5%.
    It´s a forecast. Otherwise know as best guess... probability defined by the margin of error on the source data seen in the past...
    Oh and recession is negative growth fror 2 quarters... clearly seen on the above graph...

  • kissmeneck kissmeneck

    11 Aug 2010, 1:22PM

    So the condems tell us that they're going to dump half a million of us onto the dole and there's been a drop in consumer confidence? Well fuck me, who'd a thunk it?

  • Existangst Existangst

    11 Aug 2010, 1:22PM

    Actually, the Bank has not been wrong by more than 2%, which is not much in the scheme of things, considering how difficult economic forecasting is.

    Except for now. Even a 0.5% increase in interest rates will have a devasting impact on the economy because of the usurious and greedy banks. A 2% error for inflation is neither here nor there.

    Explanation: An increase of .5% on a mortgage of, say 3% is an increase in repayments of 16.7%
    An increase in CPI of 2% is just that - 2%.

  • Mark42 Mark42

    11 Aug 2010, 1:23PM

    My solution would be a 10-15% cut across govt depts with a larger cut on millitary spending.

    How come nobody in the media has noticed that if Lloyds TSB start paying out dividends and our selling of our stakes in major banks in a few years time will pay out a third of the structural deficit at least? It couldnt be that the Con-dems are saving it for a pre-election giveaway in tax cuts for 2015.

    Double dip here we come in 2011 thanks to Gideon's VAT increase and little private sector job creation flying in the face of the OBR's prediction which seems to have been written on the back of a beer mat.

  • lightacandle lightacandle

    11 Aug 2010, 1:24PM

    " UK economy needs to rebalance away from private and public consumption and towards net exports"

    When they talk about 'net exports' does this mean the difference between imports and exports and if this is so doesn't that meant that difference could grow but nor for the right reasons.

    For example if demand goes down for imports and therefore imports fall a lot because people are losing their jobs and obviously can't buy as much but at the same time exports stay the same or slightly fall even - then wouldn't the net export figure rise even though in fact the economic situation is worse? If this is the case this doesn't seem a good form of measuring 'growth'. If I'm wrong please enlighten me.

  • onearmedscissor onearmedscissor

    11 Aug 2010, 1:24PM

    @Jibbernip

    How we continue to expand an economy based on ever depleting raw materials
    is beyond me. Too many people all chasing unsustainable lifestyles.

    The ever increasing debt caught up with us before we hit the ecological limits. This may prove to be the silver lining in the cloud.

  • carloswhizz carloswhizz

    11 Aug 2010, 1:26PM

    Why all this concentration on inflation? We all know that QE and QE Mark 2 (which is bound to occur now that Merv the Swerve has mentioned it) will create inflation over the long term. The critical question for the BoE is that of rewarding savers as well as variable mortgage holders. Money is not worth anything at present and savings will chase asset classes to create another bubble inone of those assets otherwise.

  • Gumbo Gumbo

    11 Aug 2010, 1:29PM

    The BOE comes in for a lot of stick - and it deserves much of it for inappropriately low interest rates throughout much of the 2000s and a late response to the financial crisis in 2007/08. However, at the moment its hands are tied. Interest rates cannot go any lower and for the time being QE is off the table to be held in reserve only if there are severe problems.

    There will have to be cuts in government, and these probably will need to start next year, though I think the current government have backed themselves into a corner with where they take them. I reckon therefore that the growth estimates will still have to come down even after today's changes, as much as anything due to the fact our major export markets in Europe are going to be dealing with the same issues.

  • harmonyfuture harmonyfuture

    11 Aug 2010, 1:31PM

    Hi JohannVonEndon .5% for the forseeable future says it all doesn't it. The borrowing treadmill is maintained, the over leveraged dodge the bullet, banks can squeeze an ever greater margin and the asset bubble remains inflated whilst the prudent and savers see their money disappear with paltry returns and rising inflation. Anyone with real capital that could make real investments would be unwise to ignore this preferential treatment by the B of E.

    I expect the values for Commercial properties pose some serious risks for many banks and I will be interested to see how how they propose propping those up.

  • zendancer zendancer

    11 Aug 2010, 1:32PM

    The problem all economists and BoE in particular ,is that they see economics in the classical traditional view Keynes etc. because that is how they were trained.However,the problem is that the world's second biggest economy is not included in the "profiling methods" they use.No one really forecast the incredible growth of China, nor the stupidity of US Congress in losing control if the Banks and thereby the whole economy.Think about it ,US was all about Ma & Pa businesses accross USA,they are now gone.Corporations now rule and they do not do local communities and serve only their Leaders.

    Also India ,Brazil,Africa are also developing with the help of China ,not on the West's style of "grab all the assets ,bribe the politicians and then dump the country" but, in a more long term way,providing infrastructure in return for long term arrangements for their assets(Africa by China).

    The question still remains that we now know that economic papers prepared by Civil Servants/Research groups were not only ignored by Gordon Brown but ,buried so no one could have the evidence to contradict Gordon's view,that he had stopped "boom and bust".So with a track record of bowing to political masters and a "classical view " of economics ,what use is the BoE forecasts and it's present Governor ?.

    We all know that the "day of reckoning" has nearly arrived,the "spin " of the last goverment is gone so why can we not be given the truth about the future.We need a BoE governor who is truly independent and not crippled by failure to defend his job by resigning when politicians make political decisions to reduce his power/effectiveness.If the BoE was predicting horse race results we would have given up on them years ago.

  • bayern bayern

    11 Aug 2010, 1:35PM

    Another doom and gloom article to pull everyone's spirits down into the mire. Typical left-wing frumps. What we really need here is another war, only this time one we can successfully win in a few months and not get tangled up in some dreadful Middle East hole. I personally would propose Norway - it has a small army, is not too far away, and absolutely drowing in oil. Shouldn't take a minute to have Britain smiling again, and economic problems solved too.

  • nutsch nutsch

    11 Aug 2010, 1:35PM

    In science, to have any credibility, you need to publish your model so that anyone can look at it the underlying assumptions, reproduce your results, challenge the theory etc.

    In economics, it looks as if a green crayon and some imagination are sufficient. And it pays a lot better.

    Fuck, if only the careers master told me that.

  • GuardianWatch1 GuardianWatch1

    11 Aug 2010, 1:42PM

    PS - For the truth about the global economy.....
    PODCAST GNN World Crisis Radio - Webster Tarpley.

    Discover what the 1.5 Quadrillion Derivatives Bubble is and how it's going to burst your future plans.

  • stodulky stodulky

    11 Aug 2010, 1:43PM

    I love some of the economic doublespeak that's been bandied around this week. a choppy and protracted recovery? A more modest recovery than expected?

    One of these days I'm expecting to hear about the lengthy downwards recovery that bears many of the hallmarks of bankruptcy

  • AntiEverything AntiEverything

    11 Aug 2010, 1:43PM

    Well yet again we see the results of Labours legacy on the UK.

    Although I think the Tories haven't been radical enough they are getting to the heart of the problem and trying to undo a decade of labour incompetence.

    Bring on the cuts so that we don't doom another generation.

  • geophoto01 geophoto01

    11 Aug 2010, 1:43PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Gumbo Gumbo

    11 Aug 2010, 1:45PM

    nutsch: "In science, to have any credibility, you need to publish your model so that anyone can look at it the underlying assumptions, reproduce your results, challenge the theory etc."

    Er, you can access plenty of economics PhD's and published papers and models which are effectively the same as those scientific papers you are alluding to. You can't obviously walk into a bank and have access to their internal models in the same way that Toyota and GM don't public blueprints for their cars though.

  • geophoto01 geophoto01

    11 Aug 2010, 1:45PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • herpaderp herpaderp

    11 Aug 2010, 1:46PM

    Well, we give nine billion a year in foreign aid and we give eight billion to the EU.

    How about we do neither, and we spend just half of that money on green tech, ultra capacitors and electric transport research and development.

    Might be worth a shot.

  • geophoto01 geophoto01

    11 Aug 2010, 1:47PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • geophoto01 geophoto01

    11 Aug 2010, 1:48PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • classm classm

    11 Aug 2010, 1:50PM

    But for business groups, King was not cautious enough. David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said the Bank needed to take better account of George Osborne's package of spending cuts and tax rises.

    Once these cuts and rises happen we will be spending even less if we have jobs and if that does not matter and it is not a consumer lead recovery the coalition want, then where are all those exports going to come from and where will they go to if USA/Europe are tightening their belts? Exports aren't going to happen so easily - even the deal with India only meant they bought intellectual rights the manufacture was still in India not here.
    Cuts and the way they are being done - too fast and too soon and £40bn too much are risky and recessionary.

  • pinheadangel pinheadangel

    11 Aug 2010, 1:50PM

    geophoto01
    11 Aug 2010, 1:43PM

    of the Bank maybe even restarting its programme of quantitative easing – pumping electronic money into a flagging economy

    Ah, so the Coalition does have a Magic Money Tree.

    Yes but only nice chaps get to have the magic money, no smelly park-keepers or bin men - they're can simply expect our heartfelt thanks...

  • geophoto01 geophoto01

    11 Aug 2010, 1:50PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • GuardianWatch1 GuardianWatch1

    11 Aug 2010, 1:52PM

    The time to start educating / preparing yourself via 'alternative' media is now. Keep listening to the mainstream media if you like, after all people seek comfort rather than truth. But the reality is a financial tsunami that will bring the global financial system to it's knees within the next few years. Banks and Wall St finance oligarchs have the alarm system shut down and the media in their back pockets. Currently there are 1.5 quadrillion dollars worth of toxic derivative contracts out there waiting to ruin everything. If you do not understand this GOOGLE the term "1.5 Quadrillion"

  • foolisholdman foolisholdman

    11 Aug 2010, 1:52PM

    bayern
    11 Aug 2010, 1:35PM

    "Another doom and gloom article to pull everyone's spirits down into the mire. Typical left-wing frumps. What we really need here is another war, only this time one we can successfully win in a few months and not get tangled up in some dreadful Middle East hole. I personally would propose Norway - it has a small army, is not too far away, and absolutely drowing in oil. Shouldn't take a minute to have Britain smiling again, and economic problems solved too."

    Sorry! We can't affort the bullet-proof ski suits. Besides, The British Army siezes up below -16 degrees Celcius. I know. I've seen it happen.

  • herpaderp herpaderp

    11 Aug 2010, 1:54PM

    herpaderp
    11 Aug 2010, 1:46PM

    Well, we give nine billion a year in foreign aid and we give eight billion to the EU

    .

    Yep, true. But most of that comes to UK back as CAP to the country's richest landowners - some £8 billion I think. So, obviously that can't be changed!

    Nice attempt at a pop at the farmers, but we only get three billion back as a rebate. I hate the CAP by the way, probably even more than you do.

    So, how about we stop paying into the EU, our farmers can do without their free money, and we can put the money into R&D.

  • nutsch nutsch

    11 Aug 2010, 1:54PM

    Gumbo,

    Don't "er" me, or anyone, it's very rude.

    The point, really, is that economic model's don't work, they can't -- how do you model Robert Peston going onto the telly and putting the willies up everything and everyone, or "irresponsible newspapers" deciding to "talking down the market"?

    I would like to know how the crayon-drawing is produced, though, and since the BoE is not Toyota or GM, are their models published and accessible?

  • JohnZa JohnZa

    11 Aug 2010, 1:55PM

    @geophoto01

    For heavens sake get real. This lack of confidence is down to this damned Coalition and their reckless ideological CUTS. Everybody is in fear of their job.

    What utter bollocks! Labour are the spend and bankrupt party, the only reason there was ever growth in 00's was all the new public sector jobs, housing bubble and debt! By the way I would not object to this but alot of the jobs were non job "nu-labour" PC type jobs.
    Labour always has its fingers in the till, don't see Blair struggling and giving much of his millions to the poor, do you!?
    Apart from living off of borrowed money what did 'Nu labour' contructively achieve? Any re-investment in industry, new skills, new technology, no it was pissed down the drain giving jobs to their buddies and lining their own pockets?

  • DrJazz DrJazz

    11 Aug 2010, 1:58PM

    David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said the Bank needed to take better account of George Osborne's package of spending cuts and tax rises.

    Weren't the British Chambers of Commerce calling for these very measures before they were announced?

  • CoconutJoe CoconutJoe

    11 Aug 2010, 1:59PM

    @Mark42

    How come nobody in the media has noticed that if Lloyds TSB start paying out dividends and our selling of our stakes in major banks in a few years time will pay out a third of the structural deficit at least? It couldnt be that the Con-dems are saving it for a pre-election giveaway in tax cuts for 2015.

    Bang on. The fact that nobody has made more of this important point is a mystery to me. We don't need to make these cuts that are so damaging to the economy, we can simply sell the stakes in the banks to pay back much of the deficit.

    I have a more cynical take than the tax cuts before the election motive though. It's neo-con ideologically that's driving the cuts. We've even heard it in Osbourne's rhetoric - 'less state waste', 'private sector to drive the recovery'. They want a smaller state so the rich can get richer. It's the basis of conservative ideology.

    And the sad part is tthat the Lib Dems are doing nothing to stop this. Last time I vote liberal.

  • olderiamthelessiknow olderiamthelessiknow

    11 Aug 2010, 2:00PM

    JohnZa, Labour didn't create the recession they are just the obvious target because they are 'accountable' and the real culprits arent.

    It's worldwide....worse in the US where a rightwing Government was in power.

  • onearmedscissor onearmedscissor

    11 Aug 2010, 2:04PM

    @GuardianWatch1

    The time to start educating / preparing yourself via 'alternative' media is now. Keep listening to the mainstream media if you like, after all people seek comfort rather than truth. But the reality is a financial tsunami that will bring the global financial system to it's knees within the next few years. Banks and Wall St finance oligarchs have the alarm system shut down and the media in their back pockets. Currently there are 1.5 quadrillion dollars worth of toxic derivative contracts out there waiting to ruin everything. If you do not understand this GOOGLE the term "1.5 Quadrillion"

    It's a mistake to conclude that there's a 1.5 quadrillion derivative liability bubble simply by adding the notional value of all outstanding contracts. That would be like concluding an army of one thousand men marched though a mountain pass by counting the number of footprints in the snow.

    Still, trillions in writedowns have yet to occur.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Our selection of best buys

Lender Initial rate
First Direct 2.99% More
HSBC 2.99% More
HSBC 2.19% More
Name BT Rate BT Period
NatWest Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Barclaycard Platinum 0% 15 mths More
Provider Typical APR
Alliance & Leicester Personal Loan 7.8% More
Santander Personal Loan 7.8% More
Sainsbury's Personal Loan 7.8% More
Provider AER
ING DIRECT 2.75% More
SAGA 2.75% More
HALIFAX 2.60% More

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  American Caesars

    by Nigel Hamilton £25.00

  2. 2.  Flavour Thesaurus

    by Niki Segnit £18.99

  3. 3.  It's All About the Bike

    by Robert Penn £16.99

  4. 4.  Music and Sentiment

    by Charles Rosen £16.99

  5. 5.  Elephant's Journey

    by Jose Saramago £12.99

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed