(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Ted Stevens: Alaska's stalwart uncle

Ted Stevens, who has died in a plane crash in Dillingham, Alaska, made a long career from the Senate's pork barrel politics

Ted Stevens
Ted Stevens died today in a plane crash in Alaska, where he served as senator for 41 years. Photograph: Al Grillo/AP

In Alaska, the former senator Ted Stevens – who has died in a plane crash aged 86 – was known as 'Uncle Ted' in tribute to his ferocious ability, even by the standards of US senators, to steer billions of dollars in federal funding to valuable projects within his home state.

Outside Alaska, however, Stevens's name and his works became bywords for the waste and corruption of pork barrel politics, which encourage state champions to divert taxpayers' money towards self-serving ends – most famously a grandiose 'bridge to nowhere' connecting a remote island with 50 inhabitants to the mainland for a $400m price tag.

When Republicans tried to scrap the bridge in 2005 and divert the money to New Orleans to repair damage caused by Hurricane Katrina, Stevens showed his worst side: his disdain for anything outside Alaska and his fierce temper. "If the Senate decides to discriminate against our state, to take money from our state," Stevens shouted at his colleagues, "I will resign from this body." Stevens won.

Alaskans rewarded the Republican with re-election six times to the US Senate, where he served from 1968, and by naming him 'Alaskan of the century' in 2000 – quite an achievement for someone who described himself as "a mean, miserable SOB". The Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage, the Ted and Catherine Stevens Centre for Space Science Technology in Kenai and the Ted Stevens Marine Research Institute in Juneau all testify to his reach – from the sea to the stars – within the state of Alaska.

According to figures compiled by a congressional watchdog, between 1995 and 2008 Stevens helped push around 1,450 projects worth roughly $3.4bn in federal spending towards his state. Stevens derided such critics as "a bunch of psychopaths".

The Almanac of American Politics, the bible-like guide published by the National Journal, once dryly noted:

At some point, probably in the 1990s, Alaskans began referring matter-of-factly to funding for federal projects as "Mr Stevens money". It could be argued that Mr Stevens is less a legislator than he is a philanthropist in the mode of John D Rockefeller or Andrew Carnegie, although of course he is not spending his own money.

As a local journalist joked, Stevens even surpassed oil as Alaska's leading industry. But that stream of federal largess – made possible by Stevens's seniority on crucial Senate committees and his close friendships with other long-serving senators, such as Robert Byrd and Daniel Inouye – was not enough to save Stevens when attention turned to his own personal pork barrel.

Although a badly botched case by federal prosecutors eventually led to his 2008 conviction for ethics violations being overturned, Stevens will be remembered outside of Alaska for his unsettling explanations regarding gifts he received from supporters, especially an estimated $250,000 worth of goods and services to renovate his holiday home in Alaska, doubling its size.

And some of those pork barrel projects appeared to make Alaska a laughing stock. Aside from the 'bridge to nowhere', which became a favourite Democrat talking point, allegations arose in 2008 of $2.7m in federal funding that Stevens directed to be spent on building a new road to his favorite restaurant, owned by a friend and supporter.

But Stevens's indictment by the FBI and subsequent conviction in 2008, just a week before election day that year, and public calls from senior Republicans for him to step aside, saw the unthinkable happen. Despite all that, 'Uncle Ted' still only lost to Democratic challenger Mark Begich by fewer than 4,000 votes.

That ended Stevens's reign as the longest-serving Republican senator in the party's history, and capped a political life that had begun in 1952 when Stevens worked on the presidential election campaign of Dwight Eisenhower, before moving to Alaska to work as a lawyer. Later, at the department of the interior, Stevens was a strong lobbyist for Alaskan statehood, reluctantly granted by President Eisenhower in 1958. After serving in local politics, Stevens was appointed by Alaska's governor to fill a vacant US Senate seat in 1968.

Aside from his formidable career at the pork barrel, Stevens's legislative record was almost entirely focused on Alaska, especially its oil and fishing industries. He was thwarted, though, in his long-held desire to open up the 19m-acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the northeast of Alaska to drilling, despite several attempts that came close. Generally a social moderate, he was a strong supporter of public radio – popular in Alaska – and for funding for Alaskan native villages.

During his heyday in the Senate he chaired the commerce committee's telecommunications sub-committee, and typically favoured deregulation that the industry supported. It was there, in 2006, while seeking to remove an amendment that backed strong network neutrality into a telecoms bill, that Stevens entered the annals of comedy with his bizarre attempt to explain the workings of the internet:

"The internet is not something you just dump something on, it's not a big truck, it's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material."

Ted Stevens's attempt to explain the internet

Stevens's phrasing became a cult hit and received a techno-remix.

Stevens had been a US Air Force pilot during the second world war, flying missions in China, but once told the Washington Post: "Plane crashes are the occupational hazard of Alaska politics."

So many Alaskans rely on flying in small planes to get around the huge, rugged terrain that crashes, such as the one that killed Stevens, are all too common. In 1978 Stevens was one of two survivors of a plane crash in Anchorage that killed his first wife, Ann, and four others when the private jet they were flying in was caught by a sudden gust of wind and slammed into the ground as it attempted to land.

The experience, according to contemporary accounts, was understandably traumatic. The Washington Post reported:

When Stevens came back to Washington, he seemed bitter and in terrible emotional pain... Most of his remarks in this vein were tactfully not printed by reporters, who saw them as the musings of a man half-crazy with grief.

In an odd twist of fate, in 1972 an Alaskan congressman, Nicholas Begich, was also killed in a plane crash in the state. He was the father of Mark Begich – the Democrat who ended Stevens's career in 2008.

Stevens is survived by his second wife, Catherine, and six children: three sons and two daughters with his first wife, and a daughter with his second.

Unusually for a US senator, Stevens was rarely interested in extolling his philosophy. But in his final speech on the floor of the Senate in 2008, shortly after his bitter defeat, Stevens defined his entire career in a sentence:

My motto has always been 'to hell with politics, just do what's right for Alaska.' And I've tried every day to live up to those words."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • thomzas thomzas

    10 Aug 2010, 11:26PM

    Pork Barrel spending, financial impropriety... So he's a Tea Party villain, right?

    But Sarah Palin loves him... and Sarah Palin supports the Tea Party campaign. I guess she doesn't really mind if it's Alaska getting millions of dollars in tax-payer money unnecessarily. As long as it's not going to places like Detroit or Chicago.

    So the Tea Party will turn against her, no? Probably not? Why, that makes no sense. Unless...

  • ArcticFrost ArcticFrost

    10 Aug 2010, 11:54PM

    Here Ted Steven's body isn't even cold but the Guardian can't wait to get their digs on his long lived career. They distort his record to make him out as some kind of villian because they're too lazy to do their homework and get the FACTS!

    FACT: Ted Steven's DID bring in billions of dollars to Alaska. The Alaskan Natives had been living in third world conditions and as soon as Steven's got enough seniority you bet he did his damdest to make up for the decades upon decades of America's neglect. How third world? They didn't have toilets, running water, electricity, decent nutrition, decent schools, jobs nor any hope until "Uncle Ted" finally got enough seniority to change that around. They used what's called honey buckets that they'd have to trudge out to lagoons in 40-50 f degree weather. How about you, Guardian, how many of your employees don't even have a toilet to sh*t in? Oh, but let's call it outrageous pork, who cares America was abusing a portion of it's citizenry for decades and one man put a stop to it. You bet he got the money while he could, you watch America is right back to ignoring the needs of Alaskan Natives so they can have fancy political spin against Republicans. It'll be decades before they see anything from America again, the past PROVES that.

    FACT: Your so called "Bridge to Nowhere" was to an Alaskan Native island where children are dying because they can't get to health care quick enough. They have to cross a large expanse of water on a hydroplane, which has caused documented deaths as they strive for medical care. "A Bridge to Nowhere" is a fancy catch phrase for you spinners that want to capture the nation's attention. Here's another catch phrase that applies to the Guardian, "RACISTS!" Interesting how you didn't report in exchange for that bridge the natives were willing to fork over acres and acres (worth millions and millions of dollars) of land to the public just in hopes of bettering their situation. Get your numbers straight, there's a hell of a lot more people on that island than fifty people, but perhaps you only count white people as human beings.

    FACT: It was President Obama's Attorney General that dismissed the charges against Steven's due to outrageous prosecuter conduct which is clearly part of the public record. You act as if some conspiracy must have taken place to get him off or describe well documented desctruction of a man's career as "bungling". Well, I guess that means you're accussing O'Bama as being in cahoots with the Republicans, or is he just a "bungler" too?

    FACT: You paint a picture that Steven's tried to stop Internet Neutrality when in fact HE SUPPORTED INTERNET NEUTRALITY, you idiots! You can thank him for standing in the way of corporations that want to take away from the citizen to fatten their pockets. Oh but wait, the Guardian IS a corporate entity intent on fattening it's largess while writing unresearched articles that paint lies. Sure, he did it clumsily but even his most ardent naysayers give him his due when it comes to protecting Internet Neutrality.

    I can go on and on about the misrepresentations in that article on Steven's death, but ANY decent human being can see the shallow nastiness the Guardian emerses itself in when it puts out an article like that within hours of his death. You people are so much into your hatred you can't see straight. You don't recognize your own racists attitudes, you don't research your opinions and you flat out lie when ANY amount of research would have shown you which side Steven's was on in the Internet Neutrality debate.

    You should be ashamed of yourselves! But it's obvious you have absolutly no integrity and your own words show you exactly for what you are, which is PATHETIC! You all have a good laugh at that man's death. Karma is a b*tch and it'll reign it's day amongst you. That I have complete faith in and you people just shoveled yourselves some heavy duty karma. Why don't you kick a dog on your way home, it'd be a step up for you.

  • RichardAdams RichardAdams

    11 Aug 2010, 12:43AM

    Staff Staff

    ArcticFrost, since Gravina Island, the 'Bridge to Nowhere' site, has a ferry that goes every 30 minutes to the mainland, I suspect you don't know what you are talking about. And it was Sarah Palin who used the "bridge to nowhere" line at the Republican convention in 2008, so maybe ask her to clear it up for you.

    And yes, this article mentions that Ted Stevens also got funds for native villages.

    And let's be plain: Ted Stevens did not support net neutrality in any meaningful sense - in that clip above he's explaining why he is voting against the 2006 neutrality amendment in the telecoms bill. The amendment died, thanks to his vote. So, I'm afraid you're wrong.

  • ArcticFrost ArcticFrost

    11 Aug 2010, 1:49AM

    Geeze louise, Dude, use some brain muscle - you bet there's a hydroplane AND a ferry. Try making that crossing in the middle of winter, in 40 below weather and see how often your "ferry" gets there on the half hour. It doesn't therefore the hydroplane. By the way, don't have a heart attack before you make the crossing because you'll never make it to a hospital in time.

    As for Sarah Palin making the "Bridge to Nowhere" comment, why in the world would I care what Sarah Palin has to say? I was trying to make the point that the topic isn't as cut n dry as extremists try to make it out to be. Behind every spin job are people's lives and I can't stand extremist views that (be they liberal or conservative) put every topic in a tight little box to fool people with simplistic statements. Had ANY of you been paying attention, Don Young's bridge across Anchorage's Knik inlet was (and is) the heigth of pork and rarely has one word ever been mentioned about that. Naw, let's pick on a bunch of defenseless natives, it's oh so much more fun.

    I'll give you credit for my mistake in his stance on Internet Neutrality, and I offer up my acknowledgment that I'm the idiot on that snafu. But you made it sound like he was the champion of the corporations when if it hadn't been for him, you and many others probably wouldn't even be reporting on it. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/08/ted-stevens.html If you truly knew Steven's career, he was NOT the hack of corporations. Spin will tell you he was, his contributions to the state of Alaska prove the opposite.

    I will not begrudge you his stance on pork, he was very proud of it. But there's a reason for that and that was the third world status of Natives in Alaska. You bet he was proud he fought for them and didn't let any criticism stop him. There was/is true corruption in Alaska solely for the sakes of oil barrons and their hacks, Stevens was not among that ilk. If you looked closely at that case instead of relying on spin you'd see he was caught up in a sting by the FBI against a truly rotten pig, Bill Allen, that used Alaska for his and his buddies milk money. He threw Steven's name into the mix to take heat off himself. Study the documents between the FBI and Bill Allen and it becomes quite clear what was happening.

    I'm not going to pretend Stevens wasn't full fledged politician with all the distatse that goes with it (notice I never once called him a Great man and you'll find many think him a Saint, not I), but part of that profession was knowing how to keep his nose clean. Every good loving politician in Congress and the Senate is the same way no matter what side of the isle they stand on, if you don't admit that then you're being niave and you know you're not that gullible. Now you want a Stevens that should be investigated, take a look at Ted's son. While I will not put corruption against Ted Stevens for every action showed his distaste and suavy to stay out of that realm (not because he's some sort of angel but because he was a smart politician just as there are very smart liberal politicians), but in this case the nut fell far from that tree. No one pays attention to that because it doesn't tickle ears.

    We're talking about sliming a life long civil servent on the eve of his death. Had you gave it one to two days, I wouldn't begrudge you any of your faulty rheteric. I see it as hate speach plain and simple. Were you a Republican sliming Pelosi hours after her death, I'd tell ya the same thing.

    I'm a fanatical person of the middle who finds fanaticism on the edges very harmful to this country and common sense truth. No I didn't vote for Palin, yes I voted for O'Bama and still support him. Don't believe me? I was the political cartoonist for the local paper that Sarah was the mayor. Her husband tried to get me fired. So this isn't some common rant of a conservative drone beating up on the righteous left. This is someone who is sick and tired of the low brow shenangins of BOTH sides!

  • decisivemoment decisivemoment

    11 Aug 2010, 3:39AM

    I had a certain grudging respect for the old SOB. True to his words as a constituency politician, but a living and walking example of why American politicians need a national perspective and not just their home district perspective.

    I find it interesting that Alaska is still getting the pork slathered on even though now that it's Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich in the Senate they have a grand total of about seven years' seniority between both senators as opposed to the combined 60 years that Stevens and Frank Murkowski had amassed by the 2004 election. Certainly, Stevens knew how to play the game, not just in getting projects delivered but in getting a pattern established in Alaska's favor that's proving very difficult to break.

  • sotac27 sotac27

    11 Aug 2010, 7:40AM

    ArticFrost,

    If that bridge was so fucking important why didn't the state of Alaska build it? They have plenty of money as a result of the oil companies. The state of Alaska sends about $2,400 to every Alaska citizen every year, so obviously they have the funds. Oh, I get it, don't make Alaskans pay for projects in Alaska, just get the lower 48 to pay for them. You Alaskans are the biggest welfare witches in the USA. Look up which state receives the most federal money per person in the USA.

  • erinisrad erinisrad

    11 Aug 2010, 12:10PM

    "If that bridge was so fucking important why didn't the state of Alaska build it? They have plenty of money as a result of the oil companies. The state of Alaska sends about $2,400 to every Alaska citizen every year, so obviously they have the funds."

    One can only guess that you're comments quoted above are in reference to the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend that goes out annually. You seem to be misinformed about what it is and why it exists.

    It is not some huge pot of money that the oil companies just hand over to Alaskans annually. The money does come from oil revenue but the intent was to ensure that not all the oil revenue from Alaska left Alaska - it was created in order to allow for investment in Alaska and Alaskans and to keep some of the oil revenue out of political control. Were people to start putting that money into various projects in the State would defeat the purpose of the fund as the money would then be politically controlled.

    I am not sure where you get this $2,400 figure as it is usually not more than $1,800 at most. It was high in 2008 and there was a one-off resource rebate which put the dividend check over $3,000 but in 2009 that dropped right back down to $1,300. It has been paid to Alaskans since 1982 and the average over all those years is $1,146.80 - just under half of the figure you quoted. When I was living in Alaska I did not receive one that exceeded $1,000.

    As for every Alaskan citizen getting one, well you are wrong on that count as well. Alaksans have to meet a residency requirement of at least one year and then for each qualifying year they have to have spent a certain number of days in Alaska. It isn't as if a cheque is handed to you just for being Alaskan either, you have to apply for it every year.

    I find it rather funny that people who have never lived in Alaska and have just heard some rumour that Alaskans get money to live there get up in arms without bothering to educate themselves about it. It isn't like it is some big mystery or something, it is publically accessible information about why it exists, how it operates, who receives it, and how much it is annually. I blame the Simpsons movie which makes it seem like you arrive in the State and get handed a big fat wad of cash or something.

    Lastly, I think you might want to check your figures on per capita spending again as those appear to also be wrong. According to the Brookings Institution report that came out before the 2010 census Alaska comes in THIRD for per capita spending and only $273.54 above the fourth, which happens to be New York. It might interest you to know that the number one recipient is not even a state, but a district... as in Washington, District of Columbia, the nation's capital. They received a whopping $4,656.06 per person, which is nearly twice the amount of Alaskan per capita spending.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Richard Adams's blog weekly archives

Aug 2010
M T W T F S S
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop