(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Clearing 2010: 'Full' universities turn away record number of students

All courses full at Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh and Warwick nine days before A-level results, Guardian poll finds

University of Warwick
Clearing will be 'even briefer and tighter than last year'. Several universities, including Warwick, have announced their courses are already full nine days before A-level results arrive

Record numbers of A-level students are being turned away from the country's leading universities, it emerged today, as institutions declared themselves full more than a week before the clearing system, which allocates last-minute places, opens.

A Guardian poll of 38 universities reveals that increasing demand for degree courses – up 11.6% this year – intensified by the recession and a cut in available places means that nine days ahead of A-level results, even some of the brightest teenagers in the country, predicted to achieve more than 90% in their exams, are failing to secure a university place.

Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh and Warwick already have no places left on any of their courses. The London School of Economics and St Andrews said they would have to turn down students who narrowly missed the offers they received from other universities. Oxford and Cambridge, in line with previous years, will have no places left.

Last year almost 48,000 students found a university place through clearing – when institutions that have spare spaces match-make students who have not made their offers for other universities or apply late.

But the university admissions service Ucas said the number of places in clearing this year will be "even briefer and tighter than last year".

Admissions tutors predict that clearing places vanish within two to three days of A-level results. University leaders predict that as many as 170,000 students could find themselves left without a place on a degree course. Last year the figure was 130,000.

The intense competition for places has forced institutions such as Warwick, Cambridge and the London School of Economics (LSE) to turn down even students predicted to get an A*, the new grade introduced this year which was meant to enable universities to pick out the brightest students. Students need to achieve a mark of 90% or more to obtain the grade.

The LSE said pressure on places made it "inevitable" that pupils who were predicted at least one A* would be turned down. Warwick and Nottingham universities said it was even possible that a student with a clutch of A* predictions could still be turned down.

Cambridge has said it may have rejected up to 8,000 applicants expected to achieve at least one A*. The university is considering raising its minimum entry requirements from one to two A* grades in two or three years.

The Guardian's poll reveals that some universities will only offer students a place in clearing if they have three As. Manchester University said it would have 50 places in clearing, but those in humanities would need to be straight-A students.

Warwick said that to gain a place on a physics degree in clearing a teenager would need three A-grades, including in maths and physics, or an AAB with an A in maths and a B in further maths. Sheffield said students applying for degree courses in English would have to achieve two As and a B, while Leicester said that "where vacancies exist, we will be seeking two As and a B".

Nottingham will have under half the number of places in clearing it had last year – below 50. "Tough competition means we will be turning away some very highly qualified students with two As and a B rather than three As," a spokeswoman said.

Pat McFadden, Labour's shadow skills secretary, said this year's scramble for places had been made worse by the coalition government withdrawing 10,000 university places.

The Labour government planned to provide 20,000 places for this autumn but this number was halved when the new administration came into power. The universities minister, David Willetts, has said that sixth formers who fail to secure a university place should start a business or apply for an apprenticeship instead.

McFadden said cutting the number of university places reduced opportunities for people to improve their skills. "This is very shortsighted," he said.

Universities said the threat of fines for over-recruiting students had also made them cautious about taking on too many students. For the first time this year, 60 universities and further education colleges were penalised £15.67m for over-recruiting 4,235 students. The rise in applications has been attributed in part to the recession and a wider shortage of jobs for school-leavers.

The university thinktank Million+ has warned that the poorest students are the most likely to miss out. Pam Tatlow, chief executive of the thinktank, which represents modern universities, said under-represented groups, such as students from deprived neighbourhoods, would miss out because they tended to have lower grades.

A spokeswoman for the vice-chancellors' umbrella group Universities UK said increased pressure on places would lead to a "challenging time for everyone".

"It is anticipated that the clearing process for this summer will be briefer and tighter than in previous years. However, universities are very experienced in handling high numbers of applications and they have been preparing for this peak time for many months now along with Ucas."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • stomachtrouble stomachtrouble

    9 Aug 2010, 10:23PM

    But isn't this a welcome development? The most able will secure third level education. Isn't that what was intended in the first place until misplaced guilt about the 'lack' of mass access became an ideological millstone. This is good news for quality graduate output (might have to tighten up performance assessment however of staff) and very good news for employers.

  • guardiancom guardiancom

    9 Aug 2010, 10:38PM

    I don't necessarily agree with the somewhat elitistic first comment. However given how lax A-level students are and their generally pitiable academic level compared to their peers in the majority of countries in western, central and south Europe, this is good news. I've known people who studied economics at one of the best universities in the country (named in the article), who had never even heard of Adam Smith, English-literature students who have never heard of Copernicus or the Parthenon or what a past participle is. Students who thought that Italy was to the north of Switzerland. It was stupendous and I was numbstruck, I found myself studying along people in whose majority, basic, basic information such as the above was missing. So far, the school system in Britain allows for huge disparities in the education of children/teenagers, but even at one of the best universities in the country, the level of the students at undergraduate level tends to be lower than their peers abroad (with the exception of Oxford and Cambridge, which would benefit from lowering the pressure on their undergraduate population).

  • Ragnor Ragnor

    9 Aug 2010, 10:38PM

    Education,Education,Education was the carrion cry of Tory Blair, but it should have been,Apprenticeship,Apprenticeship,Apprenticeship for we forgot that this nation was founded on the mechanical skills of its work force and not the graft and corruption skills of Bankers and City Slickers........

  • guardiancom guardiancom

    9 Aug 2010, 10:43PM

    Dear Ragrnor, The mechanical skills of the work force won't work *alone* nowadays. This is the 21st century. And the university is not just for bankers and "city slickers".

  • nyrdagur nyrdagur

    9 Aug 2010, 10:44PM

    This news does not mean that only the most able will get a University education. Students who need three D grades to get their place and achieve those grades will be in University come September, those who needed three A grades and get AAB might not.

  • Gelion Gelion

    9 Aug 2010, 10:46PM

    Education Education Education - or universities universities universities - was a vanity project of Blair's - like the London Olympics.

    UUU is an idea that will not help anyone, the employers who will suffer from a surfeit of average graduates. The students become unemployable. The UK does not need thousands of media studies students graduating every year.

    The other obvious point is simply this. Britain needs much better basic education with the top %age of those will go on to be graduates.

    What should not be allowed is the current situation where only 5% of working class kids get to university. This is wrong. I was watching a programme on Stowe school the other day with their class sizes of less than 10 per class. ALL UK schools should be like this, not just private schools. Talented kids from all classes and incomes should have their chance.

    And this would not be difficult to pay for: Trident costs £100 billion. Scrap it and invest in better basic education and top universities, smaller class sizes and industrial and service industry apprenticeships, and turn out both top notch graduates and well trained non-graduates.

    Blair and the Tories are shamefully at fault for a completely rubbish education system in the UK.

  • thathistorygirl thathistorygirl

    9 Aug 2010, 10:47PM

    A number of my friends have unconditional offers from Aberystwyth University this year. However, as the UCAS system works electronically, they HAVE to put down an insurance choice university, or the system will not allow them to accept their 'firm' choice of Aber.

    This means that every student in the country, even those with unconditional offers, HAVE to place an 'insurance' choice on their UCAS form. This means that 1 in every 2 university places are just being used as 'backup' by students.

    All of Birmingham, Warwick, Bristol and Edinburgh's places may have been filled, but this will be including the students who have selected those universities as their insurance choice, not to mention the students who placed it as their first choice, but failed to make the grade.

    Come results day, these places will open up - not as many as in previous years, it is very true, but it is highly unlikely there will be absolutely zero, as this piece claims.

  • Burntfaceman Burntfaceman

    9 Aug 2010, 10:48PM

    Great, how bad is unemployment going to get amongst the 16-24 age bracket, 42% such as Spain? And how disenfranchised is a huge swathe of our young people going to feel inside the next decade? Can't get a UNI place with 3 A's at A level? FFS this country is so wasted...

  • skybluesquirrel skybluesquirrel

    9 Aug 2010, 10:49PM

    How can they declare themselves full if the results aren't yet out? Im fairly certain the results haven't come out as the Daily Mail haven't had a front page picture of an attractive 17 year old girl, looking over excited (and a bit saucy for the older gentleman reader) for at least 360 days or so.

    Do Universities get the results before the students? If so, if you thought you were going to Warwick or Bristol (or anywhere else mentioned), congratulations, you're in...

  • thathistorygirl thathistorygirl

    9 Aug 2010, 10:54PM

    @skybluesquirrel

    Universities get their results the day before students, but they're not allowed to update the student's online UCAS form to confirm the student's place at the University until results day. So sadly no one knows yet, as results day isn't until a week on Thursday...

  • guardiancom guardiancom

    9 Aug 2010, 10:55PM

    Dear myrdagur,
    Yes, but clearly then these students aim for different places. An academic place of DDD won' t attract a student predicted with/achieving AAB surely. The upshot is that this system shares many characteristics with entrance exams in other countries. If someone wants to study "Film Studies" at UWE and gets a place and someone else achieves higher marks but doesn't get a place at Oxford or Edinborough, that doesn't mean the system is unfair. It selects for different things according to different aims.

  • jentho jentho

    9 Aug 2010, 10:55PM

    Either Warwick has no places left OR it has places on its physics course. You can't have both.

    Besides, there are unlikely to be many places left at this point, but the actual number of vacancies depends on how many students with firm (conditional) offers get their grades.

    On Willett's suggestions of alternatives:

    Is an 18 year old who hoped to go to uni to study engineering going to be happy with a Level 1 (you need a GCSE to start) apprenticeship in car mechanics? There are 9,000 vacancies advertised on the apprenticeships website as against 100,000-odd teenagers not going to uni. And some of them will be taken up by people who didn't get their GCSE grades; or who need to retrain; or who failed their college courses.

    So we have 90,000-plus teenagers at a loose end and no work for them. Can an 18 year old get a business start up grant? Can we cope with 90,000 start ups? What are they all going to DO?

    Oh I know - hang around doing odd jobs, claim benefits, and get under Mum's feet. Then we can all moan about young people.

  • bbeth bbeth

    9 Aug 2010, 10:58PM

    @skybluesquirrel

    This won't apply to all, but some courses will have people like me on. People who have worked for a good few years, been made redundant in a work area that is going to be flat for years (regeneration) and have seen the opportunity to build their knowledge and tweak their qualifications by going back to Uni for a year. I was accepted on my course a few months ago and am now just waiting to let my house, get my career development loan and revisit my collection of baked beans recipes.

  • MERidley MERidley

    9 Aug 2010, 11:02PM

    JerryTheDog

    A university place should be open to all who want it. I imagine no better off child will be denied one, the young people who live in the inner city urban areas like Hackney will and they have to get a degree to have a chance, none of daddies friends to get them a job in the City.

    But I accept your philosophical point and more importantly the pic of your dog is cute.

  • eleanargh eleanargh

    9 Aug 2010, 11:04PM

    @thathistorygirl: it doesn't work quite like that - universities don't only make as many offers as they have places. They actually offer a lot more. Places which say they are full have not simply made the same number of offers as they have places - they will have calculated how many offers they need to make based on statistics of how many people will accept the place, how many will meet the grades, and how many will come to them as insurances. So using these statistics, they know their courses will be full come September and they cannot offer anyone else a place.

    Anyway - yeah, this article doesn't really tell us anything. So some universities will be turning away highly-qualified candidates - that happens every year, because there are always those even higher qualified. Those with very high grades will only be failing to get a place if they applied very late or if they fail to meet their offers - which again, happens every year. The real story is at comes at the end of the piece - the disproportionate impact of limited places on those from lower socio-economic backgrounds, who may flourish at university but will miss out because they have not had the advantage of an education and background that gives them high grades.

  • pilgrim98 pilgrim98

    9 Aug 2010, 11:11PM

    should anyone be allowed to take up a univeristy course who has not get at least one C at A level?

    that would cut the pressure down on places and raise the univeristy ability level.

    when I went to University (over 25 years ago) the whole point of having a degree was that it showed a minimum standard of academic ability and education.

    DDD should be regarded as not good enough.

    ps yes I know some students do grow at university but I bet many don't and this brings the whole university system into serious disrepute.

  • nyrdagur nyrdagur

    9 Aug 2010, 11:12PM

    My comment was mainly in response to stomachtrouble. But personally I feel that there is something wrong with a system in which D students can get University places and straight A students can't. There should be more opportunities available to academically able students to go to a good University, whilst at the same time there also be more opportunities for those who aren't so academically minded to get some sort of further education that isn't a degree. It might sound horrible but I left school a year ago and many students applying to go to rubbish Universities didn't really want to go to uni, they just didn't have any better options.

  • mwhouse mwhouse

    9 Aug 2010, 11:14PM

    If the margin between success and failure is from 89% to 91% then the exams themselves are not up to the task of selecting out the most able students. Two-tier A-levels, or entrance exams at all of the top institutions cannot be far away.

    The system clearly needs changes, but how to change it without disproportionately favouring the most privileged students? More university places and more funding for higher education, of course. But you can't expect an elitist, protectionist Conservative government to let the proles gatecrash the party.

  • nyrdagur nyrdagur

    9 Aug 2010, 11:14PM

    My comment was mainly in response to stomachtrouble. But personally I feel that there is something wrong with a system in which D students can get University places and straight A students can't. There should be more opportunities available to academically able students to go to a good University, whilst at the same time there also be more opportunities for those who aren't so academically minded to get some sort of further education that isn't a degree. It might sound horrible but I left school a year ago and many students applying to go to rubbish Universities didn't really want to carry on studying, they just didn't have any better means of fulfilling their career objectives.

  • billybraggsplectrum billybraggsplectrum

    9 Aug 2010, 11:18PM

    I got into a top uni through clearing, with school grades which were nothing spectacular. I got a top first, outperforming all the other students in the year, most of whom were the kind of kids who some commentors here think 'ought' to be at university.

    One things for sure: the turning away of students has got nothing to do with keeping up 'standards': its got more to do with the bottom line.

  • ndg123 ndg123

    9 Aug 2010, 11:19PM

    At the risk of offending vast swathes of the readership, let me say this:- We don't need more people doing pointlessly lightweight arts and humanities courses. The proper academically weighty ones from Russell group universities are fine - they provide the fresh intellectual input to our country. But the rest should just be shut down and replaced with technical training colleges to provide the skills as country to meet our needs (knowledgeable and skilled trades people) and to be able to make stuff to sell.

    The schools have a big part to play in this, i.e. setting people's expectations in life about having a hard manual job which pays middling wages and is something to be proud of.

    I of course say this as an embittered science graduate who found out that being an intellectual powerhouse and genius, is absolutely not valued by any of the vacuous empty suits running our large companies and our country.

  • ArseneKnows ArseneKnows

    9 Aug 2010, 11:21PM

    ,

    David Willetts, has said that sixth formers who fail to secure a university place should start a business

    Is this fucking government for real? the banks aren't even lending to busines customers with whom they've had relationships for years I can see them all bending over backwards to help finance 17/18 year olds.

    David Willetts, even with two brains, wouldn't get a place at university this year if that's the best he can come up with.

    Thirteen years in opposition slagging off New labour and when they get in they haven't got a clue.

  • MeMe24 MeMe24

    9 Aug 2010, 11:22PM

    It is ridiculous that students with high grades are are not able to get into universities when we are still funding bottom level universities that bring in students who are not suitable for university.

    I know of people who got university places with E and U grades. If someone is getting below C grades at A-level they are not suitable for academic degrees- but should be doing something more vocational- not being ripped off with an unsuitable qualification.

    I believe that the expansion of higher eduction has being fantastic- a generation ago in my family going to university would have being a pipe dream. However, I agree that the expansion should be in top level universities or rather courses (not accross the board) and the cuts in the bottom level.

    Pit simply- those getting university places are the ones with the best grades.

  • akadessie akadessie

    9 Aug 2010, 11:23PM

    Stomach Trouble's comments sum up everything that is wrong with this country. 170,000 are denied access to higher education - and apparently this is a "good thing for employers". How in the name of God is it a good thing, for employers, society or anyone else, to have a less well educated population? We might reluctantly have to accept that we can't afford it - but this government's celebration of ignorance (the "two brained" minister in charge of HE actually responding with glee to this news says all you need to know) is just baffling.

    Truly depressing.

  • WaterDragon WaterDragon

    9 Aug 2010, 11:25PM

    @ thathistorygirl

    I think you are wrong about unconditional offers still requiring an insurance place. My son had three unconditional offers, including that of his first-choice institution. The UCAS instructions clearly stated that if his firm choice was unconditional, he could not have an insurance choice but had to decline all other offers. This makes perfect sense. Perhaps your friends chose Aberystwyth as their insurance choice and had a conditional offer as their first choice?

  • Ragnor Ragnor

    9 Aug 2010, 11:27PM

    @FreshTedium

    Yes my friend I did mean carrion call,the vultures and crows who peck at our flesh and well being are not seen in the halls of engineering, but in the halls of finance and commerce, the very ones who stole the world loot..........

  • RaynorGoddard RaynorGoddard

    9 Aug 2010, 11:29PM

    Go forth and get yourself proper professional exams, part time whilst working... you may have to work harder to begin with for poorer employers, but you will save yourself a fortune (from the higher education industry) and can put this towards some proper exams.

    And take it form me the graduates will catch up but only eventually many years later after realising the con they were sucked into...

  • bill2 bill2

    9 Aug 2010, 11:30PM

    Why don't they kick out the foreign fee-paying students to make room for our own ones?

    Or perhaps they are kicking out our own to make way for more foreigners to pay off our debts?

    Which is it to be?

  • MaryJane7 MaryJane7

    9 Aug 2010, 11:33PM

    The proper academically weighty ones from Russell group universities are fine - they provide the fresh intellectual input to our country. But the rest should just be shut down and replaced with technical training colleges

    Really? Durham should be shut down? Bath? York? SOAS?
    Please. Half the Russell Group universities aren't even considered among the top 30 universities.

  • Trock Trock

    9 Aug 2010, 11:35PM

    This all seems slightly implausible. I mean, they were saying a lot of this stuff last year and yet I got into Edinburgh with only just over my entry requirements (though it must be stressed that I am eternally grateful for my place and chance to study there, and that I am definitely TRYING LIKE HELL to do absolutely the best I possibly can with my opportunity. And possibly doing better than than some of the others that got straight As in their Highers/A Levels)

    Perhaps I was an exception, I don't know...

  • ChiefBrody ChiefBrody

    9 Aug 2010, 11:35PM

    Record numbers of A-level students are being turned away from the country's leading universities, it emerged today, as institutions declared themselves full more than a week before the clearing system, which allocates last-minute places, opens.

    Isn't it a bit late to be applying for university this year? (Other than if going to go through the Clearing route, within which of course there will be places available).

    A Guardian poll of 38 universities reveals that increasing demand for degree courses – up 11.6% this year – intensified by the recession and a cut in available places means that nine days ahead of A-level results, even some of the brightest teenagers in the country, predicted to achieve more than 90% in their exams, are failing to secure a university place.

    Sorry, but I think this is BS. Surely the brightest teenagers in the country would have had their applications in last year. And those that are failing to secure a place are just going for an institution that's out of their reach.

    Shock horror - not everyone can go to a top uni.

  • WaterDragon WaterDragon

    9 Aug 2010, 11:36PM

    I think the figures for non-EU students at British universities is something like 8%. These students are overwhelmingly from well-off families who can afford to buy their children a good education abroad. If there is a shortage of places at British universities they should be allocated to British and EU students first, otherwise this is a form of privatisation of education for those who can pay- on a global level.

  • jentho jentho

    9 Aug 2010, 11:37PM

    The DDD students will get their places, the A*A*A wil get theirs and the AAB-drat-I-needed-AAA students will not get anything at all because they aimed high and missed.

    Happened here. Child now planning to improve her French and go abroad as it will be cheaper.

    incidentally, having spent 2 years going 'D is a fail', I finally checked the AQA website. Oops. D is a fail at GCSE, but a pass at A-level where it translates to 50%-60%.

  • sokkerlover sokkerlover

    9 Aug 2010, 11:38PM

    No. University is not for all. And we have wrongly spent quite a few years now channelling people through uni who probably have non-academic skills that could really benefit themselves and the country as a whole.

    My son moved into uni from a state school and has done well in chemistry but will now have to move abroad to develop his interests and skills, probably never to come back. I love my son and I love my country so this is a very sad day for me.

    But the country has been run into the ground by a (comparatively) small 'elite' of people who control the media and who are basically squeezing the pips out of the system. Short termism and casino capitalism, rather than planning for the future of our population.

  • Academicus Academicus

    9 Aug 2010, 11:39PM

    bill2:

    You clearly have absolutely NO idea about how this system works. The number of 'our own' (i.e. UK) students admitted is set by government (since they have to pay for each of them to the tune of about £10K per year). When Universities say they are 'full' as far as UK students are concerned, it means that they have hit the intake of UK students that they government has said they will fund at that institution. They could take more if the funding was there. Because non-EU students are not funded in any way by the UK government, they can be accepted by universities. The two are NOT in competition for places. Please get a basic grasp of how our univeristies actually work before starting to go on about 'foreigners'...

  • natbankofuganda natbankofuganda

    9 Aug 2010, 11:40PM

    Don't worry. No need to fret. There's already a growing army of disillusioned unemployed graduates, willing to take these new youngsters left without jobs and university places and futures, in hand. And teach them - for free - in such a subversive way, that the Tories and their CBI friends, will one day be rueing the fact they didn't stump up the money for extra university places - just to keep this generation of young people, inside the tent spitting out, than outside the tent spitting in.

  • willb42 willb42

    9 Aug 2010, 11:41PM

    More youth dumped on the crap heap because (insert as appropriate) have buggered this country.
    Though from a selfish point of view, less of the dimmer people going to University, tossing it off and coming out with sh*t degree and loads of debt is not a bad thing. If nothing else it stops undermining my degree.

  • iamelectrogirl iamelectrogirl

    9 Aug 2010, 11:41PM

    i feel sympathy for this year's a level achievers. it seems deeply unfair for this year group and it's going to be far more difficult for them than it was back in the day i had a choice about which uni to go to. i understand the point someone made about apprenticeships etc, and i agree with the "not everybody needs a philosophy degree" argument, but i also see that there aren't many great alternative options open to this year group - and it's a hard economic climate they're facing too (yes, i know, along with everybody else - but at least we had the chance to get a degree even with our less than brilliant grades...)

  • Academicus Academicus

    9 Aug 2010, 11:44PM

    Waterdragon: please see my comments to bill2 above - you also don't seem to grasp that the two cohorts (UK and non-EU) aren't in competition for places - the 'lack of spaces' for UK students arises from the refusal of govt to fund further places for them, not because of a lack of capacity in the universities themselves, or because a finite number of places are being taken away from UK students by their non-EU counterparts...

  • NapoleonKaramazov NapoleonKaramazov

    9 Aug 2010, 11:45PM

    Contributor Contributor

    Get the fires of industry burning again. Free specialist skills training and apprenticeships for all.

    Universities are largely just finishing schools for middle class offspring. Nothing wrong with serious academic work though. Scrap all media and film studies courses an instead set up more science, technology engineering and maths courses.

    If the mummies darlings need a rite of passage let them fund themselves to go to Thailand or wherever. Universities are not rites of passage.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop