(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

A hand that still haunts me

I can't stop thinking about one particular incident at the World Series

Sometimes, a hand can haunt you for years. I keep thinking back to one from this year's World Series of Poker.

With blinds at 50-100, an opponent called Juliano limped in on my right. Juliano had told me he was playing the main event for the first time, as a tribute to his late father. This, combined with the fact that he had not played a hand since the start, told me that he had no intention of bluffing on day one. When he limped, I put him on a small to medium pair, looking to hit a set.

My hand was 4♣ 5♣. This is a nice little hand for seeing a flop cheap and early, so I limped behind. An active youngster on the button raised to 400; Juliano called and I called.

The flop came a miraculous 6♥ 7♦ 8♠. Juliano checked and I checked, knowing the button would definitely bet. I was discounting his hand – it could be any old rubbish – but I knew he would make a continuation stab. He duly bet 1,200, called by Juliano, and I check-raised to 6,500. The button folded and Juliano called. Interesting. Cold-calling a bet and a check-raise? I hoped he had hit his set.

But the turn was 8♥. Now I hoped he hadn't hit his set. When he checked, I checked behind.

The river came 2♦ and Juliano bet 11,000. The alarm bells rang so loud, I practically got tinnitus. Why bet out on a paired, straightening board, after that strong flop action, with two pair? Too dangerous for a careful player. I swallowed and folded.

On the break, my fellow British player John Duthie told me: "85% he had a full house." But it comes back to me at traffic lights, in the bath, in my dreams: that 15%, that 15% . . .

victoriacoren.com


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • OllieDavies OllieDavies

    11 Aug 2010, 10:40AM

    Well, according to the law as written by Murphy, he had 8K♣
    But of course, had you have raised, I can say with absolute certainty and credence that he would have been sitting on a pretty 87♣.
    The simple fact is that all laws, including probability, thermodynamics and the laws of motion deffer to Murphy's.
    The poker table is His playground and we are His climbing frame.

  • OllieDavies OllieDavies

    11 Aug 2010, 10:49AM

    oh and I love how fantasticly unclear the suit symbols are on comments. That coupled with lack of an edit feature has prompted me to have to clarify that, yes, I am aware that there is only one 8 of (spades) in a deck, and the symbols above are both infact embryonic clubs.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Our selection of best buys

Lender Initial rate
First Direct 2.99% More
HSBC 2.99% More
HSBC 2.19% More
Name BT Rate BT Period
NatWest Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Barclaycard Platinum 0% 15 mths More
Provider Typical APR
Alliance & Leicester Personal Loan 7.8% More
Santander Personal Loan 7.8% More
Sainsbury's Personal Loan 7.8% More
Provider AER
ING DIRECT 2.75% More
SAGA 2.75% More
HALIFAX 2.60% More

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed