(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Three million in the queue for compensation over PPI mis-selling

The FSA has issued new rules to firms

The FSA headquartes in Canary Wharf, London.
The FSA headquarters in Canary Wharf, London. Photograph: Alex Segre /Alamy

Nearly three million people who took out payment protection insurance (PPI) sold by banks and other lenders could be in line for compensation totalling more than £2bn after the Financial Services Authority today issued new rules on how firms should handle the flood of complaints over mis-selling.

The Financial Ombudsman Service revealed that it had received more than 100,000 PPI complaints already, with nearly 2,000 received in the last week alone. In four out of five cases, the ombudsman found in favour of the complainant, and told the PPI seller to pay compensation typically of around £1,500.

The FSA is concerned that too many individuals are being forced to take their case to the ombudsman rather than finding resolution from the bank when they first complain. It said: "FSA data [received from 18 major sellers of PPI] shows that on average, firms reject almost half of the PPI complaints they receive, but some reject nearly all. Around 30% of rejected complaints go on to the ombudsman, where more than 80% are overturned in the consumer's favour," it said.

The regulator now estimates that the number of complaints about PPI will rise dramatically to around 550,000 a year for each of the next five years, and today set out new procedures on how banks and other lenders should approach the issue. It added that some lenders will contact people who may not have complained, but who might still have been sold a policy wrongly. Last year, firms were told to re-open 185,000 old complaints they had previously rejected.

"We look forward to consumers being treated fairly whether they are buying or complaining about PPI," said Dan Waters, the FSA's director of conduct risk.

PPI has become one of the biggest areas of enforcement activity by the regulator since a Guardian investigation first exposed in 2004 massive mis-selling of the product by firms enjoying profit margins of 80% or more.

PPI is sold to customers to protect them if they default on a loan, mortgage or credit card debt when they are made redundant or fall sick. But the investigation revealed that millions of people had been sold over-priced policies where making a claim was in some cases virtually impossible.

In September 2005 Citizens Advice made a "super complaint", calling for an Office of Fair Trading investigation into the PPI business, which at the time had an estimated 20m policies in force and produced annual revenue in excess of £5bn for the banks and other lenders.

Citizens Advice debt policy officer Peter Tutton said: "We welcome the fact that the FSA is taking firm and appropriate action to get to grips with the harm done to consumers by widespread mis-selling of PPI over many years. Evidence from our CAB network has consistently shown that too often consumers have been mis-sold PPI policies that are far too expensive and completely unsuitable for their needs, often contributing to debt problems.

"A huge step to restoring consumer confidence is ensuring that people who complain get a fair hearing and proper redress. Up until now, firms have too often handled complaints very badly, so FSA action to spell out to firms what is expected of them was absolutely necessary."

But the cost of compensation could force some smaller lenders into bankrutpcy, warned KPMG. "The fear is, however, that some smaller distributors could find that the full cost of remedying these sales challenges their status as a going concern – and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme will have to pay – so ultimately, the whole industry may have to share the pain," said Dan Thomas, KPMG partner and head of remediation.

The FSA said it has carried out 24 investigations and three thematic reviews, issued warnings, halted the selling of single premium PPI with unsecured personal loans, visited over 200 firms, and handed out fines totalling £13m. "Now, with this package of measures we're confident we can mend a market that has been broken for too long," said Waters.

A number of major firms have now pulled out of the market, including Lloyds Banking Group, which stopped selling PPI for loans, credit cards and mortgages across all its brands late last month.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • Freedom4Citizens Freedom4Citizens

    11 Aug 2010, 10:04AM

    The banks are finally agreeing to dtich the PPI - decades too late for most people who have suffered losses.

    But one reason is that the banks have launched a new scam to ripoff bank customers: IDENTITY THEFT INSURANCE.

    They are already cold calling account holders and tacking it automatically onto credit card applications.

    The IDENTITY THEFT INSURANCE must be stopped now!

    Not 20 years later when UK account holders are billions of pounds out of pocket while the PPI scam,.

  • GladstoneBrookes GladstoneBrookes

    11 Aug 2010, 12:02PM

    Interesting article, we blogged about this yesterday and say that it is about time the FSA showed some Teeth!

    For too long the finanicial institutions have "played" the complaints regulations and treated their customers like idiots. Hopefully this will change, I say hopefully because until we see the new rules and regulations in place and working, we can't be sure what impact they will have and whether it will just be a case of the banks worming their way out of a whole new set of rules instead!

  • Gumbo Gumbo

    11 Aug 2010, 1:39PM

    The thing is, that like extended warranty covers, the protection would be useful, it's just that the prices charged for it and conditions attached at the moment make it simply worthless to a policyholder and basically a scam. I certainly wouldn't advise anyone taking this sort of policy out.

  • POMPEYFAITH POMPEYFAITH

    11 Aug 2010, 7:25PM

    You are better off with an income protection plan through an insurer as this will cover not just one loan but instead you total income.

    Works out a lot cheaper than a single upfront policy which is paid at the beginning in full and interest is applied at the loan rate.

  • InkaCola InkaCola

    12 Aug 2010, 12:52AM

    Not only are these PPI things a rip off but so are the claims companies in the google ads when people can contact the ombudsman for free.

    http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/contact/index.html

    You need to go through your PPI providers complaints procedure first as I understand it.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Our selection of best buys

Lender Initial rate
First Direct 2.99% More
HSBC 2.99% More
HSBC 2.19% More
Name BT Rate BT Period
NatWest Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Barclaycard Platinum 0% 15 mths More
Provider Typical APR
Alliance & Leicester Personal Loan 7.8% More
Santander Personal Loan 7.8% More
Sainsbury's Personal Loan 7.8% More
Provider AER
ING DIRECT 2.75% More
SAGA 2.75% More
HALIFAX 2.60% More

Compare insurance

Search insurance policies

Get an insurance quote for your travel, home, car, life and health, dental and more

Compare insurance

Search insurance policies

Get an insurance quote for your travel, home, car, life and health, dental and more

Find local professional advice

Search UK-wide for an independent financial advisor or legal expert in your local area who meets your personal requirements

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop