(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Premier League preview No20: Wolverhampton Wanderers

Wolves have more firepower up front, but defensive frailties may mean another busy season for Marcus Hahnemann in goal

steven fletcher
Steven Fletcher is a shrewd signing from Burnley who could prove an ideal strike partner for Kevin Doyle. Photograph: Andrew Boyers/Action Images

Guardian writers' predictions: 18th (NB: this is not necessarily Paul's prediction, but the average of our writers' tips)

Last season's position: 15th

Odds to win the league: 3,000-1

Wolves need fangs. They were the most toothless team in the league last season, failing to score in nearly half the games they played (17 out of 38) and mustering fewer goals than anyone else. Not being an idiot, Mick McCarthy knows this. And he has done something about it.

Steven Fletcher looks a shrewd signing from Burnley, the ideal partner for Kevin Doyle, who too often last season was condemned to running himself into the ground on his own up front. The frequency with which Wolves played 4-5-1 may have been a reflection of the manager's deeply ingrained caution, but it might also have been a pragmatic acknowledgement that he didn't have another player dangerous enough to consistently deploy alongside Doyle, with none of Sylvan Ebanks-Blake, Andy Keogh and Chris Iwelumo looking up to the task.

The arrival of Fletcher, a canny mover and reliable finisher, removes that excuse. Indeed, the form of Ebanks-Blake in pre-season has suggested that he, too, deserves a second crack at the Premier League and explains why, even if Doyle does not recover from the injury that has been niggling him recently in time for tomorrow's kick-off, McCarthy will start with two up front against Stoke. Wolves look to have a better strike-force than the three promoted teams.

The other reason this correspondent does not agree with the aggregated prediction above is that the supply to the strikers should also be better this season. Like Fletcher, Stephen Hunt looks a fine acquisition. He may not be the game's most elegant winger but he is a persistent menace, snapping and bustling down the channels relentlessly, creating openings for others or forging them for himself. Had he been fit for the denouement of last season's campaign, Hull would probably have survived.

He also has a proven ability to combine well with Doyle, the pair having played together at Reading as well as with the Republic of Ireland. With Hunt and Fletcher to complement Doyle, it is unlikely that Jody Craddock will again be Wolves' second-highest scorer, as he was last season, with five goals.

McCarthy does not have the money to make any further additions to his squad but he will have the tricky Michael Kightly back after injury and can trust in the ability of players such as Matt Jarvis, Karl Henry and Dave Edwards to continue to improve. All three of them grew into the Premier League last season, getting better as the campaign progressed to the point that they looked quite at home in the top flight. They are, however, quite similar in style and, given the inconsistency of Nenad Milijas, Wolves do lack a midfield conjurer to dissect defences with cunning passes. Then again, so do a lot of other teams.

If we can expect Wolves to be better going forward this season than last, their defence may well be more dodgy. Christophe Berra should remain a reliable rock but time, surely, is eroding the 35-year-old Craddock's effectiveness. Loanee Michael Mancienne played mostly as a holding midfielder last season but the emergence of Adlène Guedioura means he will not be missed following his return to Chelsea – he might, however, have been a useful option in the centre of defence, though someone even more skilled would have been preferable.

Ronald Zubar is too error-prone to fit that bill, and may be needed at full-back where Kevin Foley's lack of pace can be problematic. Jelle Van Damme is decent on the other side and Greg Halford, initially expected to be cast out this summer, has been so impressive in pre-season that McCarthy has decided to keep him, though that may say more about his lack of transfer funds than any belated development by the defender. It looks like Wolves are again going to need Marcus Hahnemann to perform more saves than any other Premier League keeper.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • RandallFloyd RandallFloyd

    13 Aug 2010, 4:35PM

    18th? I disagree.

    I have them down to finish 15th. There are lots several teams who don't have the quality of players or manager that Wolves have so basically they're too good to go down.

    I like Mick McCarthey a lot and expect he'll do another good job at the club. I think he deserves a chance at a big club and Villa should at least be considering him. In a perfect world he'd replace Mancini at City. If there is one person who wouldn't have a problem dealing with all the egos there it would be Big Mick. Ask Roy Keane.

  • crow96 crow96

    13 Aug 2010, 4:37PM

    I have Wolves down as 18th too, but anything could happen so they might well be safe, since a lot of the teams tipped to be in the relegation struggle are quite equal. Wolves are going to need some goals from the front two and Milijas has to justify his transfer fee. Hunt looks like a good signing.

  • realdelia realdelia

    13 Aug 2010, 4:39PM

    Wolves start with a big game tomorrow. If they lose to Stoke (my team, but I know we'll be lucky to win three away league games this season) then they'll be in a bit of a hole.

    Incidentally, these two have been playing league matches against each other for 122 years. Blackburn v Everton is also a 122-year-old league fixture tomorrow. Never forget, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Tottenham - it was our league and we very kindly let you join.

  • newgoldandblack newgoldandblack

    13 Aug 2010, 4:40PM

    Pretty much spot on with our strengths and limitations.

    Three reasons why I believe we will stay up again this season:

    1) We were a very young and inexperienced side last season, we are now one year older and wiser.

    2) An injury to Doyle last season and it would have been goodbye Premier League hello Championship, we now have a 2nd striker in Fletcher! An absolute key signing.

    3) With the investment made in the first team at a time when a lot of teams are penny pinching or losing players, hopefully we can steal a march on one or two clubs above us.

  • Grizzlyred Grizzlyred

    13 Aug 2010, 4:42PM

    I have them down as 18th too but theres a number of clubs down there that fit the bill. You still can't see them scoring enough to stay up. Them, WIgan or Newcastle to go with West Brom & Blackpool.

  • Bohobunny Bohobunny

    13 Aug 2010, 4:42PM

    18th is way too harsh. I think, once with Kightly and Hunt back in the team, they're capable of springing surprises. But their achilles' heel is, as you so rightly point out, the back 4.

  • SonOfTheDesert SonOfTheDesert

    13 Aug 2010, 4:43PM

    realdelia:

    Incidentally, these two have been playing league matches against each other for 122 years. Blackburn v Everton is also a 122-year-old league fixture tomorrow. Never forget, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Tottenham - it was our league and we very kindly let you join.

    Arsenal were also founder members of the league, were they not?

  • SonOfTheDesert SonOfTheDesert

    13 Aug 2010, 4:44PM

    Oh, and I'm not going to say anything about where I think Wolves will finish, because I think they'll finish below West Brom, and that might make some people hunt me down like a ill-tempered fox.

  • mroli mroli

    13 Aug 2010, 4:47PM

    Finally. And I've waited for this and there are many inaccuracies in it.

    Wolves' survival last year was based on the fact that they were defensively sound - they had to be because of the lack of goals. 6 teams shipped more than them at home last year, 7 away - Wolves finished 15th. Our defence is "more dodgy" on the basis that Craddock is a year older at 35? And that Mancienne has gone back to Chelsea, despite the fact he wasn't first choice? Brilliant.

    Karl Henry plays as the holding midfielder. Guediora is much more of a box to box midfielder and won't be playing as a holding midfielder.

    Dave Edwards was more of a bit part player than say David Jones (and it is interesting that he is running down his contract in the same way he did in Derby). It will be up to one of Jones/Edwards/Milijas to provide the creative spark - and that is what so many teams are missing in the Premiership.

    Foley doesn't have a lack of pace - he is a classy right back that played in the holding role last year, or at right midfield to allow the more exuberant Zubar to stay at right back. Craddock may be aging, but is far better this time round in the Premiership than he was last time. Mouyokoulo was bought from Hull in the Summer to do that job.

    Hahnemann performing more saves than any other Premiership keeper shows what a good keeper we have in him - we also have outstanding deputies in Hennessy and Ikeme (Wales' no1 and that rarity - a promising English keeper). If Matt Murray could ever regain fitness...

    Wolves' problems last year stemmed from the fact that whilst Matt Jarvis gave the team an attacking outlet on the left (suprisingly for many Wolves fans making the "step up" without any real problem), with the injury to Kightly we didn't have the balance on the right. With his return and the introduction of Hunt, we have more balance.

    Left back was a problem that has been addressed with the purchase of Jelle Van Damme, although he may also be a centre back fill in with Ward and Big George Elokobi showing that they aren't quite up to this level of football.

    Attack should be intriguing where Doyle is quality, Fletcher is a good buy (if on the expensive side) and Ebanks Blake really needs to show that he isn't the strongest force in the Championship, but unequal to the Premiership. Andy Keogh continues to be a Republic of Ireland pick and you'd think Trappatoni knows what he's doing, but out of favour at Wolves.

    We finished above West Ham and Bolton last year and I would reckon that our summer investment keeps us nominally stronger than those two teams - we need to develop a more attacking mentality and not lose our defensive stability.

  • prodir prodir

    13 Aug 2010, 4:47PM

    Interesting take.

    From a fans perspective:

    GKs: Hahnemanm has a season in him. Hennessey is getting better and better. Ikeme asa 3rd choice isn't bad going. Murray is over - it's a shame as he'd be England No. 1 if fit.

    RBs: Zubar is 1st choice - errors are rare compared to his Marseilles days. Halford is looking great and said in the local paper The Express and Star that he is now tee-total. It shows on the pitch. Foley will play as a CM or my RM more frequently from what MM has been saying.

    CBs: Berra is top draw if a little slow though. Mouyokolo is an astute signing and has good pace. Berra can organise Mouyokolo and Zubar to the right of him - giving us athleticism at the back in both pace and aerial ability. Craddock's old head is great for the squad. Stearman can play anywhere across the back and is a former England U-21 - a good squad player.

    LBs: We're overloaded. We'll see how Van Damme does - he looks a good footballer and has good positional sense from what I've seen. Stephen Ward is a good understudy and can play LM. Matt Hill will hopefully be offloaded. Elokobi is a beast but is he good enough at this level - probably not.

    RMs: Foley may play there as Kightly comes back. Kightly is top-draw, we just need him fit. we've got Belgian U-21 Mujangi-Bia back on loan and let Nathaniel Mendez-Laing out on loan who is arguably a better player - strange one from MM there.

    CMs: Karl Henry excelled himself last year. Guedioura is now settled. Dave Edwards (as Doyle notes) keeps improving. David Jones was amazing in the 2nd half of the season (new contract not signed yet but he sshould stay). Milijas has a great left foot - not much else but he may come good. Tbh, we have strength in depth here. Mancienne is no loss.

    LMs: Hunt won't be fit until January. Jarvis was superb last year. He must be one of the 20 fastest men in the PL - needs to improve his delivery but surprised a lot of us Wolves fans last year. Surman has gone - he didn't have the pace for this level.

    CFs: Doyle is superb - works hard and can get 10 goals this year. Hopefully Fletcher will be good - nice left foot and works hard as well, versatile as he can play wide. Ebanks-Blake, although I love him for firing us up, might not be up to it in the PL. Keogh might be on his way out - he's just a pair of lungs. Vokes is out on loan - nice long term prospect. Got rid of Maierhofer out on loan (one of about 5 mistakes by Mick). Watch out for Ashley Hemmings, who can also play wide left, played for England at all youth levels scoring bags of goals.

    All in all, we're stronger this year. We were predicted to go straight back down last year and finished 15th. We were safe with 4 games to spare, thrashing West Ham away. We can compete at this level. We've spent £18m this summer and I think we'll consolidate in about 13th-15th. It's taken 4 years for MM to convince me but he's done it. I thought he played 4-4-2 in straight lines but to be fair to him, last season he switched us to a 4-5-1 and we reaped the benefit of David Jones great form and Henry's stability. It was nice to hear MM saying we'll play 4-4-2 when useful but that he was thinking of a fluid front 3 of Jarvis, Fletcher and Doyle. With Kightly to come back the prospect is mouth-watering for us Wolves fans.

    Slag off MM for his boring manner and for being a straight-talking Yorkshireman. Write us off as negative for playing 4-5-1. Call us a long ball team (which we obviously aren't. Just ask West Ham fans about how we passed through them away from home in a crunch relegation match).

    We're looking good and have a bright future. We can secure ourselves in this league. There's a glass ceiling once you approach the Top 6 but I'll take 5 years of mid-table mediocrity and a cup run. It might not seem ambitious but after years of struggling to even make the play-offs we've got here and we're not leaving. Really, it's still Sir Jack's achievement.

  • prodir prodir

    13 Aug 2010, 4:48PM

    Interesting take.

    From a fans perspective:

    GKs: Hahnemanm has a season in him. Hennessey is getting better and better. Ikeme asa 3rd choice isn't bad going. Murray is over - it's a shame as he'd be England No. 1 if fit.

    RBs: Zubar is 1st choice - errors are rare compared to his Marseilles days. Halford is looking great and said in the local paper The Express and Star that he is now tee-total. It shows on the pitch. Foley will play as a CM or my RM more frequently from what MM has been saying.

    CBs: Berra is top draw if a little slow though. Mouyokolo is an astute signing and has good pace. Berra can organise Mouyokolo and Zubar to the right of him - giving us athleticism at the back in both pace and aerial ability. Craddock's old head is great for the squad. Stearman can play anywhere across the back and is a former England U-21 - a good squad player.

    LBs: We're overloaded. We'll see how Van Damme does - he looks a good footballer and has good positional sense from what I've seen. Stephen Ward is a good understudy and can play LM. Matt Hill will hopefully be offloaded. Elokobi is a beast but is he good enough at this level - probably not.

    RMs: Foley may play there as Kightly comes back. Kightly is top-draw, we just need him fit. we've got Belgian U-21 Mujangi-Bia back on loan and let Nathaniel Mendez-Laing out on loan who is arguably a better player - strange one from MM there.

    CMs: Karl Henry excelled himself last year. Guedioura is now settled. Dave Edwards (as Doyle notes) keeps improving. David Jones was amazing in the 2nd half of the season (new contract not signed yet but he sshould stay). Milijas has a great left foot - not much else but he may come good. Tbh, we have strength in depth here. Mancienne is no loss.

    LMs: Hunt won't be fit until January. Jarvis was superb last year. He must be one of the 20 fastest men in the PL - needs to improve his delivery but surprised a lot of us Wolves fans last year. Surman has gone - he didn't have the pace for this level.

    CFs: Doyle is superb - works hard and can get 10 goals this year. Hopefully Fletcher will be good - nice left foot and works hard as well, versatile as he can play wide. Ebanks-Blake, although I love him for firing us up, might not be up to it in the PL. Keogh might be on his way out - he's just a pair of lungs. Vokes is out on loan - nice long term prospect. Got rid of Maierhofer out on loan (one of about 5 mistakes by Mick). Watch out for Ashley Hemmings, who can also play wide left, played for England at all youth levels scoring bags of goals.

    All in all, we're stronger this year. We were predicted to go straight back down last year and finished 15th. We were safe with 4 games to spare, thrashing West Ham away. We can compete at this level. We've spent £18m this summer and I think we'll consolidate in about 13th-15th. It's taken 4 years for MM to convince me but he's done it. I thought he played 4-4-2 in straight lines but to be fair to him, last season he switched us to a 4-5-1 and we reaped the benefit of David Jones great form and Henry's stability. It was nice to hear MM saying we'll play 4-4-2 when useful but that he was thinking of a fluid front 3 of Jarvis, Fletcher and Doyle. With Kightly to come back the prospect is mouth-watering for us Wolves fans.

    Slag off MM for his boring manner and for being a straight-talking Yorkshireman. Write us off as negative for playing 4-5-1. Call us a long ball team (which we obviously aren't. Just ask West Ham fans about how we passed through them away from home in a crunch relegation match).

    We're looking good and have a bright future. We can secure ourselves in this league. There's a glass ceiling once you approach the Top 6 but I'll take 5 years of mid-table mediocrity and a cup run. It might not seem ambitious but after years of struggling to even make the play-offs we've got here and we're not leaving. Really, it's still Sir Jack's achievement.

  • Ruz23 Ruz23

    13 Aug 2010, 4:49PM

    Why the references to lack of transfer funds. I beleive that until Chelsea signed Ramires, Wolves were the 2nd highest spenders in the Premier League this summer. That now makes them 3rd - hardly a lack of transfer funds!!

    Secondly, there was no "deeply ingrained caution" when Wolves scored so many goals in winning the Championship.

    Apart from that a good article, shame about a ridiculous prediciton of 18th. Wolves finished 15th last season and have strengthened in all areas they were weak and yet they are deemed to now be worse than Newcastle, West Ham and Wigan???

  • dollymix dollymix

    13 Aug 2010, 4:50PM

    Good writeup Paul. Of the teams that might be expected to be in relegation trouble, they've probably got the best keeper which should be enough to keep them up. Plus they showed in a lot of games last season that they can hack it at this level, they rarely looked outclassed from what I remember.

  • mroli mroli

    13 Aug 2010, 4:52PM

    Oh - I would also like to say that when Sir Jack sold Wolves for £10 to Steve Morgan, he also ensured that the £30m he would have received was set aside for the club. That has gone not only on players with Mick receiving the financial backing he failed to get at Sunderland, but there are also great plans afoot for the development of the stadium.

    Wolves have a great training ground facility and still are within the heart of the Ciy.

    Without casting a stone at any other clubs, that sort of base is enviable.

  • crow96 crow96

    13 Aug 2010, 4:58PM

    Prodir, good explanation. As I said, there are a lot of teams who could be involved in a relegation battle and Wolves are potentially one of them. Last season they quite clearly lacked creativity in midfield, but were actually strong defensively (Karl Henry looked a very good player to me). If they can find that spark in attack they should be comfortable but other teams like Bolton and West Ham have improved and in my mind, West Brom and Wigan are underrated as well. I will be watching with interest.

  • Creton Creton

    13 Aug 2010, 5:03PM

    Son of Desert...

    Accrington, Aston Villa, Blackburn Rovers, Bolton Wanderers, Burnley, Derby County, Everton, Notts County, Preston North End, Stoke F. C., West Bromwich Albion and Wolverhampton Wanderers were the first English 'Football League'.

    No Arsenal in there. In fact, no London in there.

  • prodir prodir

    13 Aug 2010, 5:04PM

    crow96, fair points. I just think a lot of people underrate our chance because they don't like MM for whatever reason. I can see what you're saying though. I think it'll be tight for us until the 6 games or so in terms of relegation. I'm thinking around about 46-48 points this year. Our squad is stronger than WBA, West Ham, Wigan and Newcastle. We have two decent players in each position, at least. A competitive squad helps.

    Also, something which I forgot earlier, MM buys guys with the right character. They're hungry and good lads. It's very rare that one of our boys is caught pissed in Oceana Wolverhampton on a Saturday night. We don't dive and we don't crowd the ref. I know a lot of people are anti-MM because of the Roy Keane/Saipan affair but tbh he runs a tight ship here.

  • IanCRock IanCRock

    13 Aug 2010, 5:06PM

    randallFloyd:

    The Guardian's collective tallywhacker looks like this:

    1 Chelsea
    2 Manchester City
    3 Manchester United
    4 Arsenal
    5 Tottenham Hotspur
    6 Liverpool
    7 Everton
    8 Aston Villa
    9 Fulham
    10 Bolton Wanderers
    11 Stoke City
    12 Sunderland
    13 Birmingham City
    14 West Ham United
    15 Blackburn Rovers
    16 Newcastle United
    17 Wigan Athletic
    18 Wolverhampton Wanderers
    19 West Bromwich Albion
    20 Blackpool

  • DavidArrrggghhhh DavidArrrggghhhh

    13 Aug 2010, 5:09PM

    The other reason this correspondent does not agree with the aggregated prediction above is that the supply to the strikers should also be better this season.

    Criticising the regime Paul?

    Seani will be putting a single bullet in his rifle as we speak.

  • Kovno Kovno

    13 Aug 2010, 5:11PM

    Well, thank god that's finished. A decent review, as most of them were, but the reader comments are unbearably tedious. Earnest fans who think that we should care about their team, and clowns who think we care about their predictions and their hilarious use of the word tallywhacker. The Rumour Mill has again been amusing since the comments were switched off. The sooner this is done for all articles the better.

  • prodir prodir

    13 Aug 2010, 5:15PM

    Kovno, don't read the comments then. Some of us like to engage in discussion about our clubs, and indeed others. Why don't you just read the article then stop reading after the line. What a novel idea.

  • shashamamakaka shashamamakaka

    13 Aug 2010, 5:16PM

    Well, since this is the last preview I'll whip out my tallywhacker ( to which I've just given about 5 minutes thought ):

    Chelsea
    Man City
    Man Utd
    Liverpool
    Spurs
    Bolton
    Arsenal
    Everton
    Villa
    Blackburn
    Birmingham
    Fulham
    Stoke
    Sunderland
    Wolves
    Wigan
    Blackpool
    West Ham
    West Brom
    Newcastle

    Good luck to everybody's team and let's hope it's all settled fair and square.

  • mike65ie mike65ie

    13 Aug 2010, 5:42PM

    I'm open to correction but Wolves scored more goals on the road than Liverpool last season I think. Last term was clearly one of learning and Wolves did just that switching the formation to a defensive 4-5-1 with Doyle running his socks at the head of a noticeably settled side as Mick McCarthy stuck with those he considered most trustworthy under pressure.

    Most first season survivors who crash back into the second rung do so because of over-achieving in the first season like Ipswich and so ending up in Europe or because they are complacent and think they'll cope with little fresh investment. Wolves have spent and spent well I think. Fletcher and Doyle can play in tandem or as lone hunter/gatherer. Hunt who is out until October (?) will be nothing if not tireless in pursuit of a ball or an opponent. His retro end of tour 'guitar roadie' look adds to his appeal.

    It'll be a another tough season no doubt and their curtain raiser against Stoke could be set an early high bar for anti-football but they won't be going down for lack of trying. Oh and I doubt Mick will field a so-called weakened side against Manchester Utd.

  • cable1973 cable1973

    13 Aug 2010, 5:55PM

    I seem to have agreed with far too many of the Guardian writers predictions; eight, I'll obviously have to go back to the drawing board immediately.

    I'm not convinced that Fletcher and Doyle are the answer. Not in a 4-4-2 anyway. 4-5-1 with Doyle a bit wider maybe.

    Knightly coming back should add a few goals.

  • lovingu lovingu

    13 Aug 2010, 6:07PM

    mroli
    13 Aug 2010, 4:52PM:

    "Wolves have a great training ground facility and still are within the heart of the Ciy."

    Is that "Ciy" supposed to mean "city?"

    I used to live on Penn Road.
    Wolverhampton is, at best, a town.

    gg

  • RedHector RedHector

    13 Aug 2010, 6:07PM

    If there is one team I wish to in the drop zone apart from man Scum its Wolves for their gutless behavior last season. I've not forgotten the Boys 11 they put out against united and the the nonsense MM said about why he had done it. Gutless and dangerous it totally undermines the whole league. Plus its a city that time forgot that would be improved by being used as a nuclear testing ground. Sh*t club, cr*p city may their season be painful.

  • waywardwind waywardwind

    13 Aug 2010, 6:10PM

    Guardian writers' predictions: 18th (NB: this is not necessarily Paul's prediction, but the average of our writers' tips)

    Which once again proves the almost legendary adage that most Guardian writers don't have a clue about the subject or subjects they write about with such apparent conviction!

  • waywardwind waywardwind

    13 Aug 2010, 6:13PM

    If there is one team I wish to in the drop zone apart from man Scum its Wolves for their gutless behavior last season. I've not forgotten the Boys 11 they put out against united and the the nonsense MM said about why he had done it. Gutless and dangerous it totally undermines the whole league. Plus its a city that time forgot that would be improved by being used as a nuclear testing ground. Sh*t club, cr*p city may their season be painful.

    Bitter and twisted AND clueless... you're multi-talented, aren't you?

  • greenyguts greenyguts

    13 Aug 2010, 6:14PM

    Sorry Red Hector but that's an absolute load, check how many of the team who played Utd in that game also regularly featured in the run that secured the points that delivered survival. It was no 'Boys 11' as you put it being formed entirely of first team squad members without a youth teamer in sight.

    What's the point of having a squad if only the big teams are allowed to rotate theirs at will?

  • prodir prodir

    13 Aug 2010, 6:17PM

    RedHector, the XI that played against Manu we're first team squad members. Several of whom were important in our turn in form mid-season when we changed to a 4-5-1.

    As for the City being a craphole. Well that's your opinion. Here in the Black Country (let's not argue about the Black Country's parameters) we realise that we're in a poverty-stricken area with a very high unemployment rate. Top 10 in the country I believe. It's a tough City and not very pretty but I still don't think we should be made homeless and be wiped off the face of the earth. But then again, maybe I'm biased. I hop you're used for nuclear testing.

    GG, it's now a City (capital C). It doesn't mean a lot to us but we're not a town. Dudley - that is a town.

  • RedHector RedHector

    13 Aug 2010, 6:20PM

    Sorry mike65ie but the dye was cast the day MM put out a weaken team for a league fixture in the middle of a season. It makes a joke of the competition and says everything about the ambition of that club. if you can't challenge in every game then you shouldn't be PL. Plus after working in Wolverhampton for several years it truly is a dreadful little town.

  • paulhs paulhs

    13 Aug 2010, 6:24PM

    Have a look again at the Guardian's League Preview bottom 11:

    10 Bolton Wanderers
    11 Stoke City
    12 Sunderland
    13 Birmingham City
    14 West Ham United
    15 Blackburn Rovers
    16 Newcastle United
    17 Wigan Athletic
    18 Wolverhampton Wanderers
    19 West Bromwich Albion
    20 Blackpool

    Is it just me, or does that look like the largest relegation battle in Premier league history?
    I just can't believe that 8 of these teams will finish higher than Wolves.

    as for RedHector:

    Gutless and dangerous it totally undermines the whole league.

    why single out Wolves?

    Plus its a city that time forgot that would be improved by being used as a nuclear testing ground. Sh*t club, cr*p city may their season be painful.

    This sounds like the kind of thing someone who has never been to Wolverhampton would say. As for the club - it is a club with a great history and a mature ambition that has developed some good young players over the years. Whats not to like? - Ah, ignorance - I get it now!

  • lovingu lovingu

    13 Aug 2010, 6:26PM

    RedHector,
    get it sorted!

    prodir,
    I enjoyed my time (around 2 years) in Wolverhampton - supposedly studying, but mostly supping, shagging and playing rugby.

    I spent a lot of time around Dudley (bet you get a lot of mileage out of reminding them they live in a mere town!) and at the Cider House in Quatt - is it still there?

    As an Oldhamer, born and bred, I felt very much at home in Wolverhampton. It had that same town feeling about it; the city was Birmingham.

    I'd love to see both your home town and mine rise from the poverty, but the recent election doesn't give me much hope of that.

    gg

  • mroli mroli

    13 Aug 2010, 6:37PM

    @gg: http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/ - there you go the official website of Wolverhampton City Council. I know, I can scarcely believe it either. Most Wolves fans are pretty easy going about Wolverhampton itself, but proud of the club and its history (if in turn incredibly cynical and jaded). I think the song about our player of the year Jody Craddock "He used to be sh*te, but now he's alright" sums us up pretty well.

    And as regards the game against Man U - we did this all at the time, Wolves went on to have a pretty good turn of the year and the team we fielded contained 5 players who finished the season as regulars and in the team were 4 full internationals, 3 U21 internationals and an English U20 international.

    Plenty of teams have done far worse.

  • greatboosup greatboosup

    13 Aug 2010, 6:41PM

    Wolves started last season with a frightening lack of Premiership experience within the squad. The team started slowly and got better as the season went on (it took Mick a while to switch to 4-5-1 and work out his best XI). We have strengthened during the close season.

    We will finish higher than 18th*

    * = Unless afflicted by a huge injury crisis. The same of course applies to pretty much any of the "lesser sides" under the new squad rules. If they have a bad run of injuries in the autumn any of the bottom 12 could be floored

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Sportblog weekly archives

Aug 2010
M T W T F S S
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5

Premier League

Pos Team Pld W D L Pts
1 Chelsea 1 1 0 0 3
2 Blackpool 1 1 0 0 3
3 Aston Villa 1 1 0 0 3
4 Wolverhampton Wanderers 1 1 0 0 3
5 Blackburn Rovers 1 1 0 0 3
6 Birmingham City 1 0 1 0 1
7 Sunderland 1 0 1 0 1

More from Premier League 2010-11 previews