(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

The parent trap: art after children

Is the pram in the hallway the enemy of good art? Frank Cottrell Boyce, novelist, screenwriter and father of seven, makes the case for chaos

JG Ballard with his children
‘Real creativity should feel like a game’ . . . JG Ballard with his children Bea, Fay and Jim at home in Shepperton in 1965

We were still students when we got married and had our first baby. It must have been hard work. We didn't have a washing machine and we couldn't afford disposable nappies – but mostly we were drugged with happiness. Our only conversational gambit was: "Isn't he amazing?" Friends were mostly delighted, but also slightly appalled. From the first they'd take me aside and commiserate. "That's it now, Frank, the pram is in the hallway."

The full quote – from Cyril Connolly – is: "There is no more sombre enemy of good art than the pram in the hallway." In fact, we didn't have a pram or a hallway, but in the dark watches of the night I would sometimes look at the Maclaren Dreamer buggy in the corner of the tiny kitchen and think, is that it then? Will I have to go and get a proper job and never write again?

Happily, I had married a woman of terrifying courage who, the day I was offered a proper job, said: "Don't do it, Frank. Go to the library, write something for us." I didn't produce a work of precocious genius, but I did get myself started as a TV hack. Ever since then, fatherhood and writing have been inextricably intertwined for me.

I'm not the only one. The most commercially successful British writer (JK Rowling) and the most ferociously inventive (JG Ballard) were both single parents. Edith Nesbit had three children of her own, and then adopted the two that her feckless husband had with his mistress. She founded the Fabian Society, precursor of the Labour party, and still had time to write 60 novels, among them the most purely funny pages in the language.

My children have been a crucial part of my work in ways that I find hard to account for or anticipate. If I need to go on a research trip for a book or a film, we'll usually go as a family, and I find that – apart from the fact that it's useful to have extra eyes and ears – people and places tend to open up to you more. In southern Europe, in particular – now that the birth rate is practically zero – there is much nostalgia surrounding big families: when we turn up, all nine of us, it's as though a bunch of rock stars have arrived by steam train. Once, in Sicily, we got a round of applause just for walking down the street.

Making trips and meeting unusual people is good for the children as well as the work, of course. Usually. There was the time I got a gig on a big-budget children's movie. I thought how fabulous it would be for the children to come down to the set and hang out with dragons and knights and goblins. The producer, Brad, was intensely committed to the idea that every frame of the film should be "kid-relatable". Oh, what animated and exciting discussions Brad and I had about what was kid-relatable (dragons, knights, Kinder eggs) and what wasn't (unicorns, jesters, aniseed).

Brad himself seemed very relatable to me, so I invited him back to our place to meet our real, live kids. He turned up with a body bag full of Kinder eggs. How relatable! He got down with the kids and opened egg after egg, whooping when he found some elegant, complicated assembly kit and casting aside any keyrings or character figurines. It was fun to start with, but soon he was discarding chocolate, too. This was disturbing. Chocolate is a controlled substance in our house, something to be treasured and shared. The sheer scale of Brad's treat was crushing the magic out of it. It was as if your fairy godmother had appeared and brought with her the massed infantry of the People's Republic of Fairy Godmothers.

Then, with a mountain of surprises piled up in front of him like poker chips, Brad began to barter away the ones he didn't like. My children were too polite to say no. They were also too polite to scream, even though I could see that they now viewed Brad as their First Hellish Vision of the Existential Void. He had unleashed his inner child, and it was the illegitimate offspring of Augustus Gloop and Violet Beauregarde. That night, after prayers, I promised my children that I would never ever work with, talk to or mention Brad again. How had I failed, in all those hours of meetings, to spot what was so obvious the minute he walked through the door? That he was an infantile, narcissistic suit.

Ever since Brad, I have been suspicious of the modern philosophy of "me time". I happened to make a throwaway comment to this effect earlier this year, on Desert Island Discs, and honestly you'd think I'd refused to abide by the laws of gravity. At every event I have done since, the traditional "Where d'you get your ideas from?" question has been replaced by a perplexed, testy quizzing about "me time". One young man asked me if I wasn't worried about "the pram in the hallway". I asked him where the phrase came from. "Cyril Connolly." "And what did he ever write?" The questioner thought for a minute then said, "Shit. Yeah", and thanked me for "liberating him from fear". Blimey.

It's not that I don't like a break now and then. I just don't buy the idea that the break is "because I'm worth it" or that I'm taking "the time to be me". What is "me", if not the sum of all my relationships and obligations? A customer, that's what. The more you give, the more you are. Think of Chekhov, with his patients and his crowds of dependent relatives, whose living room became such a public space that he had to put up no smoking signs. His advice to young writers was "travel third class". Ralph Waldo Emerson's was to "buy carrots and turnips".

For centuries, writers have sung the virtues of staying connected to the routine and the mundane. Real creativity should feel like a game, not a career. Having to hang out the washing or get up and make breakfast helps you remember that your "work" is actually fun. And for it to stay fun, you have to be unafraid of failure. It's very powerful to be surrounded by people who love you for something other than your work, who are unaware of the daily, painful fluctations of your reputation. I discovered recently that my youngest child thought I spent my days typing out more and more copies of my book Millions, so that everyone could have one.

Writing is a peculiar balancing act between freedom and discipline. Writers are free to spend their days doing whatever they like; but if they don't write, then they are not writers. They are on their own and so vulnerable to every distraction, whether that's drink or the Antiques Roadshow. Jonathan Franzen has said that "it is doubtful that anyone with an internet connection in his workplace is writing good fiction". Family is, of course, the most potent distraction, and probably the only distraction that makes you feel virtuous when you surrender to it.

There's a belief that to do great work you need tranquility and control, that the pram is cluttering up the hallway; life needs to be neat and tidy. This isn't the case. Tranquility and control provide the best conditions for completing the work you imagined. But surely the real trick is to produce the work that you never imagined. The great creative moments in our history are almost all stories of distraction and daydreaming – Archimedes in the bath, Einstein dreaming of riding a sunbeam – of alert minds open to the grace of chaos.

Writers have produced great work in the face of things far more stressful than the school run: being shot at, in the case of Wilfred Owen; being banged up in jail, in the case of Cervantes or John Bunyan. Yet that pram is lodged in our imaginations, like a secret parasite sucking on our juices.

In fact, if you go back to Connolly's terrific book, you'll see that the pram is only one of the many Enemies of Promise. Others include a public school education (so emotionally overwhelming you can't move on) and success, surely the greatest enemy of all. But no one warns you about these. It's just the pram.

Why does it retain its power to chill? I don't think it's about fear of distraction or domesticity. I think it's a fear of babies. Being a parent – or really loving someone other than yourself, whether that's your children, parents or your lover – forces you to confront a horrible truth: the fact that we get older. The amazing boy who was born when I was still a student is a man now. There is no way that I can still think of myself as "quite young, really" or "a child at heart". Parenthood confronts us with our own mortality, every day.

As a society, we are in flight from our own mortality. What made Brad the producer so monstrous was that he was fleeing in terror from his own adulthood. What Brad did in my living room, our whole culture is currently doing in its multiplexes, in its chemists, in its bars and department stores. Brad thought it was going to be his turn for ever. It's not.

The mess we've made of this planet comes partly from the fact that we all feel we're going to live for ever. Has art done much to make us think differently? When I think of art that tries to address these things – well, there's not much of it, and it's not much cop.

I remember reading that when the writer Tracey Chevalier had her first baby, someone told her that "every baby costs one book"; she said something to the effect that that seemed fair enough. But we should turn Connolly's equation upside-down and say that maybe what's in the pram – breathing, vulnerable life, hope, a present responsibility – is actually more important than good art. It might make us produce less art, but maybe it would be art with the future at its heart.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • duster duster

    1 Aug 2010, 11:16PM

    'I discovered recently that my youngest child thought I spent my days typing out more and more copies of my book Millions, so that everybody could have one'

    It's worth having kids simply because they can make observations like that. Genius.

  • Joyandtears Joyandtears

    1 Aug 2010, 11:28PM

    Ha, as a recent parent & husband, I think that my partner is the biggest enemy of art. A child is undemanding, you can sort out childminding, even without tax credits. A partner on the other hand has the greedy emotional neediness of a child, but unfortunately you can't pay someone to mind them, while you work.

    Intimate relationships are the enemy of art.

  • thegreatfatsby thegreatfatsby

    1 Aug 2010, 11:41PM

    Yes. And yes again. Though it should be remembered that Ballard was drunk (ish)
    for most of the time. Not that I have a problem at all with that. Though I did skip beer for the years between 1 and 16.

  • DonGilCalzasVerdes DonGilCalzasVerdes

    1 Aug 2010, 11:56PM

    and success, surely the greatest enemy of all. But no one warns you about these.

    Fame and perhaps prestigious awards with a lot of money in particular seem to be paralysing. It is surprisingly few artists who continue doing work at the same high level as the ones that gave them awards in the first place. Sometimes the artist is so old that the most productive time has passed because of that but that is not always the case. Sorry, not including the Oscar in this.

  • someloudthunder someloudthunder

    2 Aug 2010, 12:25AM

    The mess we've made of this planet comes partly from the fact that we all feel we're going to live for ever. Has art done much to make us think differently? When I think of art that tries to address these things – well, there's not much of it, and it's not much cop.

    What serious art doesn't address these things? Mortality is at the centre of all art.

    Also, how deluded must you be to think even on a superficial level that you'll live forever?

    These insights are probably the reason you wrote Brookside rather than Crime and Punishment.

  • craig1459 craig1459

    2 Aug 2010, 12:39AM

    I think we'v become too concerned with ephemera like art and discarded the basics like bringing up children well.

    Joyandtears -get a life. Oh you have one - don't waste it.

  • stewpot stewpot

    2 Aug 2010, 3:36AM

    I was brought up by a single parent, my mother, who was obsessed with her artistic "work" and her all-important foreign holidays, and she'd go off on holiday on her own or sit in her room creating her "work", refusing to interact with me in any way other than cooking meals. I think she would have subscribed to Cyril Connolly's theory about prams.

    The "work" that she produced basically consisted of a few bits of crap stitching, boxes and boxes of slides of photographs of doors which she thought would be published as a book but never were, most probably because she'd never even tried to approach a publisher, but thought someone would magically appear or something, gallery exhibitions of carpets she'd bought which had zero visitors, illustrated children's books which she'd created and then threw away in self-disgust (note she never once read a book to her own children), stacks of oil paintings she'd made in the 1950s lying around in cupboards, etc. etc. When she died she had written out this crazy will telling what she wanted to do with her collections of work. The fat psycho that she was living with just threw everything away. The only remnants of her years of artistic endeavours are some book illustrations she did for a neighbour.

    I really doubt that looking after children is such a burden for these artistic souls. In fact interacting with other people might well bring them much-needed sanity and perspective.

  • Penn Penn

    2 Aug 2010, 4:32AM

    stewpot

    that's a sad story, for everyone.

    Bach composed with a quiverful of children whereas Michelangelo painted, sculpted and designed without any at all. It seems to me it's not about whether you have children or not, it's about making a decision on the matter which is right for you. The Guardian is always full of articles explaining why you should or shouldn't have kids, perhaps both conditions are equally valid, it just depends on the individual.

  • Atomiclock Atomiclock

    2 Aug 2010, 4:48AM

    If you are truly creative, and you are good - sooner or later you will produce the ultimate work of art. Should this be a child or a novel, a painting or an advertising campaign or all of these things?

  • softwater softwater

    2 Aug 2010, 5:01AM

    What Brad did in my living room, our whole culture is currently doing in its multiplexes, in its chemists, in its bars and department stores.

    and

    It's not that I don't like a break now and then. I just don't buy the idea that the break is "because I'm worth it" or that I'm taking "the time to be me". What is "me", if not the sum of all my relationships and obligations? A customer, that's what.

    I've been thinking about writing something along these lines for a while, but figured it would never sell.

  • Doreeen Doreeen

    2 Aug 2010, 5:07AM

    How does Cottrell Boyce's statement

    I didn't produce a work of precocious genius, but I did get myself started as a TV hack.

    in any way disprove Cyril Connolly's maxim?

  • MissBunski MissBunski

    2 Aug 2010, 7:14AM

    Brilliant article! Gives me hope! Since having a child I have experienced a level of empathy and strength of emotion I never possessed before. It's also given me insight into what my mother has done in her life and why, and into other parent's choices in life. Since 'being a parent' constitutes most other adults in the world, I feel this can only add to my creative depth. Now, just to overcome the tiredness from interrupted nights...

  • WolfieKate WolfieKate

    2 Aug 2010, 7:25AM

    "The mess we've made of this planet comes partly from the fact that we all feel we're going to live for ever. Has art done much to make us think differently? When I think of art that tries to address these things – well, there's not much of it, and it's not much cop."

    I have to take issue with this statement as well. What nonsense. Most of us, artists or not spend our lives coming to terms with the fact our lives are brief and finite. Art does much to try and work though the ultimate human issue - we all die. Artists can try and leave behind a body of work or in my case I hope to leave behind well balanced children... but artists of all centuries have had to face mortality and expressed that through their work.

  • muscleguy muscleguy

    2 Aug 2010, 7:35AM

    JG Ballard reportedly came up with the idea for Crash because he was daydreaming out of the window, that overlooked the new M4.

    Also you do take Me time, that is what your writing is. In a domestic situation you have to manage the balancing act of being open to your muse's reactions while retaining the right and need to go off on your own to capture them before they disappear. If that is not selfish in a domestic setting then what is? That you make money from it does not change that. if you work 9-5 your family know when you are available to them, if you are an artist they never do.

  • bohemian75 bohemian75

    2 Aug 2010, 7:37AM

    @Doreeen

    Mrs Cottrell Boyce has physically, and no doubt in other ways, nurtured seven children. You surely wouldn't want to suggest that this creative work requires no art, imagination, presentation of worldview, or moments of inspiration ? Even if she did nothing outside the family, which she may very well also do.

  • hugecost hugecost

    2 Aug 2010, 7:41AM

    With all due respect, and speaking as one who knows, churning out TV and film scripts (albeit, in Frank's case, some very good ones) is not really up there with Chekhov, or indeed Ballard. The pram in the hallway has turned out not to be the enemy of skilled craftsmanship. Perhaps the great art will come when the kids have grown up and moved out? Or perhaps the drive to create "art" was never there, hence the gang of kids, the "prayers", and the happy embracing of life as a dramatist-for-hire.

  • Podfunk Podfunk

    2 Aug 2010, 7:50AM

    J.G. Ballard is the ultimate example of the artist as parent. Not only did he raise three kids alone after his wife died but he wrote utterly disturbing and off the wall stuff like Crash. Journalists who visited him at his humble suburban abode were surprised to find a happy, normal family and their pet dog rather than a William Burroughs style narco-renegade tripping his nut off on LSD. It's all about inner space as J.G. would say...

  • Doreeen Doreeen

    2 Aug 2010, 7:56AM

    @bohemian75:
    Well, that's me told! I'd better get cracking on producing the next generation of creative men, then.

    hugecost has expressed my thoughts far more graciously -- and gracefully -- than I could.

  • piphooray piphooray

    2 Aug 2010, 8:26AM

    No one's mentioned the obvious. It's all down to money. If you're talented and established or your art comes in a form that makes it an instantly saleable commodity (or you choose to focus it on an instantly saleable commodity, like being a writers hack) then there is no 'pram in the hallway' dilemma. Indeed the pram might be just what you need to kick start your career, or yourself into action. You might have to trade off some creativity against high artistic ideals, but hey. Still better than the 9 to 5.

    However, if your money-making ability is less immediate, or non-existent or you don't want to make that compromise - yep, there is a pram in the hallway, a big cash guzzling pram whereby partners and people expect you to do something constructive (ie fee earning) to pay the bills and keep a roof over your heads. I suspect the brave wife who said 'don't take a job, write something for us' had confidence his work would sell. If he was still wandering around 5 years later with a a sheaf of incomprehensible scribblings and not a bean in the bank to show for his 'work' she might have been frog-marching him to the Job Centre. Or the divorce courts.

  • sexedup sexedup

    2 Aug 2010, 8:35AM

    I love the way that this story about 'the pram in the hallway' is accompanied by a pic of a pram in a hallway. Just in case we didn't get it. That must have taken some real 'me time'.

  • sexedup sexedup

    2 Aug 2010, 8:40AM

    And lest we forget, the Miracles of Life in Ballard's autobiography were his children.

    Ballard's own parents were too busy living the expat life in Shanghai and was brought up by Chinese servants who neither looked at him nor talked to him. And after the Japanese invasion one of them simply punched him in the face.

    Ballard also talked of coming to terms with 'wounded former selves' in his writing. Perhaps it's this catharsis that made him such a (clearly) delightful parent.

  • jinbad jinbad

    2 Aug 2010, 8:43AM

    There's nothing quite like hearing what a person's named their child to spot their (the parents) inner self; 'Max', 'Hugo', 'John' 'Maureen'- all have their deeper signature. This rule seems to be at work with this article - comments on '...as long as the taxpayer does not have to foot the bill' and 'it's all about money' I can't figure out what end of selfsih these comments come from - Tory or Trustafarian.

    It's not about money, it's about Love.
    Connolly also said 'Greed, like the love of comfort, is a kind of fear'
    Don't be greedy, be Loving. Tis a gift to be simple!

  • sexedup sexedup

    2 Aug 2010, 8:43AM

    And podfunk, his abode may have been humble in one way. In another it was more of an installation, with its recreated surrealist paintings and vast collapsed pot plants. And it was handy for the British film studios -- dream factories?

  • Sirene Sirene

    2 Aug 2010, 8:57AM

    What a fantastic article!
    It reminds me a little bit, of Fay Weldon's idea, in Letters to Alice, that good writing and art grows from the hustle and bustle of chores and family life. It's reminiscent, too, of modern negative capability, or EM Forster's notion of beauty and epiphany emerging from muddles and chaos :)

  • jama7 jama7

    2 Aug 2010, 8:59AM

    A public school education 'so overwhelming you can't move on'? So most decent writers/artists have all been educated at state schools? Err .. I don't think so. Possibly slightly more 'overwhelming' to fight your way through some failing comprehensive.
    Also, the number of women's artistic careers seriously affected by the pram in the hall is always going to far outweigh that of men. 'Go off to the library and write, darling. I will bring up the children'. I wonder if a man or a woman is speaking here.

  • SecondClassPost SecondClassPost

    2 Aug 2010, 9:04AM

    Connolly did not mean that children per se – symbolised by the pram – were the enemy of good art. He meant that a family made it more likely that a writer would have to take on advertising work, which Connolly thought would blunt the creative work and so make a masterpiece less likely.

  • ivemadeahugemistake ivemadeahugemistake

    2 Aug 2010, 9:08AM

    With all due respect, and speaking as one who knows, churning out TV and film scripts (albeit, in Frank's case, some very good ones) is not really up there with Chekhov, or indeed Ballard.

    I don't know; some of the things that have touched me and made me think about life the most have been from a TV screen. Not to say that poetry or great 'traditional' writing hasn't, but TV/film does have an important place.

  • StrokerAce StrokerAce

    2 Aug 2010, 9:22AM

    It is a shame that the incovenience of children can mean that artists are less able to share their gift with the world.

    Perhaps all artists should be sterilised so they can continue their selfless devotion to making the world a better place for all of us?

  • SimianBaffin SimianBaffin

    2 Aug 2010, 9:31AM

    @ 29FR

    Looks like kids as antidote to narcissism doesn't work in every case.

    I'm thinking much the same - having kids or becoming an artist, as a shot at 'immortality', in both cases is narcissistic and unlikely to produce good results.

  • FrankCB FrankCB

    2 Aug 2010, 9:43AM

    Contributor Contributor

    Doreen
    Thanks for your comment. But that's a different story and it's hers not mine. Also I thought part of the point of this article was to say that bringing up children was more important and creative than most "artistic endeavour".

    Strokerace
    Genius

    Jama7
    That's a hilariously off-kilter picture of Mrs. CB.
    Also I wasn't saying that Connolly was right about public school or anythign else. I'm just pointing out what he actually said.

    Hugecost
    That's really interesting. Thanks.

  • Ortho Ortho

    2 Aug 2010, 10:07AM

    Bringing up kids is so incredibly creative, isn't it?.... Rabbits do it quite well too- how many baby rabbits are in therapy, after all?
    So how creative is a rabbit? Creative is now such a widely used word it means nothing at all.

    Kids take up a lot of time and energy (and for painters in particular they take up a lot of space when space is at a premium and also have to be kept away from all sorts of hazardous stuff that you use when working, which makes it worse). Some people can bring up kids without damaging their work (or their kids) , others can't. Some like and want kids, some don't. So what does that prove either way? B*gger-all, apart from 'not everyone works the same way or wants the same things as everyone else'- which we know already.

    Please can we have some real journalism on here..........?

  • Lindiwe Lindiwe

    2 Aug 2010, 10:15AM

    Art, entertainment - call it what you like but the umbrella scene in Framed is one of the most inspiring pieces of writing I've ever read.

    I don't know his other work but the children's books are excellent and now I can understand why.

    Thanks FCB

  • referendum referendum

    2 Aug 2010, 10:19AM

    Simian Baffin
    The wish to leave something behind you is not necessarily on solely narcasstic.

    Someone who writes or paints or composes whose work is published or sold in sufficient quantity to earn them a living, leaves that work behind them after their death Their work doesn't stop being sold when they peg it, sometimes rather the opposite. Their children and family ( and maybe even grandchildren) continue to receive income from it. That's quite practical, no ?

  • JRWB JRWB

    2 Aug 2010, 10:25AM

    The quotation is always given as being by Connolly, but must have existed in some form before this. In Katherine Mansfield's story 'Bliss' published eighteen years before Enemies of Promise it is referred to in a way that indicates it was already quite well known:

    "This is a sad, sad fall!" said Mug, pausing in front of Little B's perambulator. "When the perambulator comes into the hall—" and he waved the rest of the quotation away.

    The pram recurs as an image of thwarted creativity in Orwell's Keep the Aspidistra Flying, also published before Connolly's work.

  • bill2 bill2

    2 Aug 2010, 10:31AM

    @Ortho

    Considering that the main function of humanity is to reproduce itself, without which there would be nobody to appreciate art, your comment is difficult to take seriously.

    The best of us manage to be creative in family chaos; in fact they are inspired by it.

  • TaylorL TaylorL

    2 Aug 2010, 10:37AM

    An absolutely brilliant article - inspiring and really well written.

    Joyandtears - I feel deeply sorry for your partner. Use your imagination (if you have one) to consider how she might be feeling. During pregnancy you have extra-terrestrially high levels of hormones surging through your body. During childbirth you feel as if you're being torn in two. Back home with a new-born, you can experience something akin to PTSD.

    Cut her some slack if she's a bit 'greedy, emotional and needy'. If you're incapable of doing that, you're probably incapable of using your imagination to create art.

  • BoyMonkey BoyMonkey

    2 Aug 2010, 11:10AM

    Absolutely fantastic piece, it proves that the demanding, joyful presence of children both frees up the mind and imposes discipline and rigour. A perfect article, thank you!

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

    • Red Tide
    • £14.99 with free UK delivery
    • Helen
    • £7.99 with free UK delivery

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed