(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

First Test, day three, Trent Bridge

Pakistan's Kamran Akmal goes from hero to zero against England

The hapless wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal is costing Pakistan dearly in the First Test

Kamran Akmal
Pakistan wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal reacts after dropping England's Paul Collingwood during day three of the first Test match at Trent Bridge. Photograph: Gareth Copley/PA

Older readers may remember a 1960s US television comedy called Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In and a regular item on it called the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate in which fun was poked at the incompetence of a topical target. It probably wasn't great shakes in Pakistan and besides which Kamran Akmal is far too young to have watched it even if it had been. But even so, there it was, 20 minutes after lunch, the Fickle Finger, hovering over him, the chosen one.

Kamran arrived here this year with the reputation of being one of the most hapless wicketkeepers ever to have survived in Test cricket for any length of time – 50 Tests and counting – and since then has done little to disabuse anyone of that impression. He can be calamitous. This is the Clouseau of keeping. If Tommy Cooper had ever taken up the gauntlets, this would be: "Gloves, ball, ball, gloves ... ground." Just like that. In England's first innings, Kamran's capacity to drop the ball cost his perspiring bowlers and his team dearly. He uses gloves made by a firm with long and close association with Trent Bridge and the suggestion, made over a drink with a company big wig on Friday, is that they should double his money to use those of a rival instead.

By lunch though, as England batted again, he had taken two catches to see the back of the openers. The first, offered by Andrew Strauss, was deflected to him by his juggling brother Umar, clearly auditioning for Cirque du Soleil, and taken with a gleeful dive; the second, a legside flick and faint edge from Alastair Cook, was straightforward enough, although by no means copper bottomed. Then, in the space of two deliveries from Umar Gul, redemption was dangled in front of Kamran and then, just as he seemed to have grasped it in his white gloves, whisked away again.

Kevin Pietersen had battled away for an hour and quarter, trying to find some rhythm to his game and had looked as if he was starting to emerge from the darkside when Gul got one to jag back and bounce. Kamran had every right to be wrong-footed as the ball caught a thickish inside edge, but he changed direction instantly, dived to his left and, to his obvious glee, came up with the ball in his left hand – a quite magnificent catch. One in the eye for the critics then. Alas. Gul's next ball was shorter and wide of the new batsman Paul Collingwood, who flashed, edged, saw the ball disappear into Kamran's right glove and then bounce out again. Hero to zero in the time it takes to say St Godfrey of Evans.

These have been conditions in which keepers can be tested however, the edge always an option. Earlier in the day, Anuruddha Polonowita, Sri Lanka's national curator (groundsman in other words) had defended the surface at Colombo's SSC ground, where this week Sri Lanka and India batted each other into a stupor, saying, at length but in essence, that criticism of his pitch as too batsman-friendly was nonsense and that the bowling, against stellar batting on each side, had been rubbish. He has a point. Trent Bridge however has produced what is proving an enthralling contest, where ball (as opposed to the pitch), like Graeme Swann, has had a lot to say for itself.

With the singular exception of the record first-innings stand between Eoin Morgan and Collingwood, wickets have tumbled as batsmen have had trouble coping with the movement in the air, exploited so well by the trio of Pakistan pacemen and England's James Anderson. Trent Bridge has a well-earned reputation for swing, although when and why this should occur – configuration of the stands, proximity to the river, height of water table, fluctuations in the FTSE index or simply cloud cover– is a mystery.

As Mohammad Asif once more wobbled the ball around mesmerically, Kamran was forced into a little more active duty than, to judge by the reaction when so asked, he might have wished. Asif is a cannily deceptive bowler, who lopes in with total economy of effort; the bowling equivalent of easy listening. To try and negate the movement, or at least lessen it, both Pietersen and Jonathan Trott had opted to bat well out of their crease. This frustrates the bowler, particularly one of Asif's pace, for whom the obvious response is to ask the keeper to stand up to the stumps, forcing the batsman back into the crease, and susceptible once more to the swing.

Great medium and fast-medium bowlers had their keepers up to the stumps: Evans famously to Alec Bedser; while at Somerset, Tom Cartwright had Derek Taylor, with Leo Harrison there for Derek Shackleton at Hampshire. Salman Butt asked Kamran to do likewise, and he crept up with the reluctance of a young lad who has just been asked to wash behind his ears. Suffice to say it didn't last.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • ahsanib ahsanib

    31 Jul 2010, 11:06PM

    Nonsense. Kamran will score a match-winning hundred tomorrow, and combined with Imran Farhat's run-a-ball 212, we will win by tea (or maybe just after if England bowl negatively).

    What's interesting about Kamran is that he wasn't always this crap. During his first two years, he was regularly thought of and talked about as one of the world's best, both behinds the stumps and in front. I distinctly remember on his first Australian tour (04-05), luminaries such as Benaud, Chappell et al being thoroughly impressed and gushing about him. His performances thereafter got better; England's tour to Pakistan (the one after the Flintoff Ashes), India's tour to Pakistan (in January 06) and Pakistan's tour to SL (summer 06) saw him play wonderfully. His keeping was both safe and brilliant, and his batting was something else. His innings against India in Karachi (39-6 on a green pitch before he rescued us) remains one of the five best I've ever seen in test cricket.

    The England tour in 06 is when it fell apart. He suffered some injury in a tour game if I recall correctly, came back to the team less than fit, and ever since then...

    He needs 3 things: 1. Time away from the game to get the keeping basics right. 2. A sports psychiatrist. 3. A treadmill (compare his frame now to four years ago and you will learn a lot about his failings).

  • safeasmilk safeasmilk

    1 Aug 2010, 12:07AM

    His look of amazement after he'd caught Pietersen kind of said it all.
    It's quite sad to watch really - his confidence is obviously shot to hell.

    Isn't there another keeper? Perhaps they could just play him as a batsman (mind you after the 1st innings...).

  • jno50 jno50

    1 Aug 2010, 12:38AM

    I suppose he's there because all the world wants wicketkeeper/batsmen? There have been some good ones in recent years, and even Prior came good today; but Akmal just doesn't look up to it, though I recall he used to be at least okay. He's not been okay in this match. You can't help suspecting it's entirely a matter of chance whether he takes a catch - or any ball at all, really.

    Why do you think this is, ahsanib? Does he simply not get enough time to practise? The Sky commentators were saying he's standing a foot or more too wide, and thus getting all the slips slightly out of place too, and that seems plausible. Presumably he stands where he does because he thinks that's the best position to take the ball, but given that he's making rather a hash of it, shouldn't he rethink this? Or is that just too simple a solution?

  • WattosAbs WattosAbs

    1 Aug 2010, 1:00AM

    I feel really sorry for Akmal.

    His a nice lad but his struggling at the moment, his batting has also regressed.

    When are England going to slip up?

    They have been playing good cricket ever since the 51 all out game.

    Surely, the slip up has to come soon?

    Ashes 2010/11?

  • ahsanib ahsanib

    1 Aug 2010, 3:01AM

    jno50: To be honest, I don't think it's a case of standing in incorrect positions (though I'm sure that's part of it). His technique is simply quite bad -- he grabs at the ball quite a bit, which makes both catches and stumpings hard. I've always (jokingly) maintained that he must be a member of some sectarian terrorist organization -- he has plenty of options in Pakistan, let's be honest -- based on his eagerness to end Danish Kaneria's career. Dani would easily have had 300 wickets by now at a lower average if it weren't for Akmal. I'm actually very surprised that Dani has never publicly criticized him. He certainly has a right to. If Dani were a less nice guy (let's say he had Miandad's disposition), we would have more fireworks, that's for sure.

    Keeping is strange in that armchair critics, such as all of us are, are less easily able to point out deficiencies in technique and so on. With batting and bowling, it can be quite obvious what a player is doing wrong; we don't need the Athertons and Holdings to tell us. But with keeping, for whatever reason, it's harder to point out EXACTLY what's going on. I do recall the great and honorable Rashid Latif saying something about the way Akmal gets up from the crouch once the ball is delivered, specifically the timing of said get-up, being a problem. I also recall the great Ian Healy talking about where Akmal's gloves are positioned with respect to his body (too far out in front instead of closer to him) rendering him off-balance. These are tidbits but really, I have no general idea.

    As I said in my first comment, it's quite bizarre because clearly he has it in him to not just be decent but excellent. The first 2.5 yrs of his career can't just dismissed as a flash in the pan. There is clearly a "there" there, as they say. But to find it again, he needs to go to keeping boot-camp, and be dropped. But his relationships with successive captains (esp Malik and Butt) has meant that he does not face the axe as readily as he should. Pity.

  • idiobat idiobat

    1 Aug 2010, 5:27AM

    Akmal needs at least 6-12 months away from test cricket. We may be able to afford him in ODIs and T20s; his dropped catches and missed stumpings don't hurt Pakistan as much and his batting is streets ahead of the other keepers in the country. However, in Tests, his mistakes are and have been costing us matches for years. As ahsanib says, Kaneria, the bowler who, suffers most from Akmal's hands, really has the disposition of a saint; Qadir would have ripped his heart out of his chest after 2 games.

    Time to give Sarfraz or, possibly, Zulqarnain an extended run in the team. They can't do any worse than Kamran.

  • easyrider easyrider

    1 Aug 2010, 6:30AM

    Ahsanib- "Kamran will score a match-winning hundred tomorrow, and combined with Imran Farhat's run-a-ball 212, we will win by tea (or maybe just after if England bowl negatively)."

    The point is not what you said above which is in the future but the current and the past test series in Australia clearly showed his poor technique to wicket keeping.You can make this out from where he stands behind to how he moves to gather the ball to how he actually gathers it. All you need to do is watch Latief's keeping for 5 minutes.Sadly, Kamraan has to go as a keeper.I am sure your country has wealth of talent in this department and imagine the cofidence of your bowlers when an easy catch is dropped every now and then.How much bickering and snide comments flying around in the dresing room.It does not bode well for team morale.

  • easyrider easyrider

    1 Aug 2010, 12:37PM

    forget kamran for a while

    what are we going to do about the bloody batting? -

    This issue is easier to solve than Kamran's keeping technique. Bring back Younis and Yousuf. Back Salman as a captain for the next 3 series. Rest will fall in place..

  • glowingtrw glowingtrw

    1 Aug 2010, 12:49PM

    ref Y&Y i thought that once a touring side had named its test squad they could not bring in replacements?

    anyway at the very least i would bring in yasir hameed for umar amin
    and make shoaib malik bat 3

    does this result reflect pakistan's unpredictablity or the gap between england & australia?

  • neo786 neo786

    1 Aug 2010, 1:04PM

    Not playing Test cricket (whether home or abroad) is very limiting especially when hoping compete abroad and against a settled and well drilled side like England.

    With the Oz fiasco and punishments not being thought out, we have barred our best batsman and not examined the reason for failure. Akmal's Test career should have been addressed after that debacle, yet we've found him not only still playing but also a vice-captain! Again, in this Test match he dropped vital catches which was duly punished by a 200 run partnership and made it an uphill task from then on......

    We ask so much of our bowlers to bat and ball, yet we never expect the same from our batsman or fielders?

    I'm in favour of changing the old guard and injecting youth, but the question has to be asked whether you can compete with such a strong Test side like Eng with such an inexperience middle order and at what risk......4-0 or 3-0 drubbing could mentally scare the young players for future assignments? One of the two Ys needs to be brought back and Kaneria's position needs to be reconsidered.

    I fear the Pak changes will only be considered after the 2nd test.....

  • Graem Graem

    1 Aug 2010, 1:48PM

    Concentration must play its part in addition to technical deficiencies.

    Akmal is the Vice-Captain and spends a lot of time, as do many keepers, trying to gee up his colleagues in the field.

    Some keepers struggle to switch from gee up mode to concentrating on the job of keeping. I suspect that Akmal is struggling to re-gain focus on his keeping.

    In a lot of matches, when the ball isn't doing much, this will not affect a keeper. But when the ball is moving around, the keeper needs to be 100% focused on what the ball is doing, especially after it has passed the wicket.

    This is the third Test in a row where Akmal has been confronted by having to keep to the moving ball. Someone with his Test experience, ought to appreciate more where there priorities should be.

  • easyrider easyrider

    1 Aug 2010, 2:23PM

    "anyway at the very least i would bring in yasir hameed for umar amin
    and make shoaib malik bat 3 " - If Yasir had lobotomy, then, he can be given a chance.Bring back the 2 old batting goats and set a strong no nonsense purposeful management team.Your team will do alright.No sir,, the problem with Pakistan cricket has more to do with PCB and the volatile and cunning set of ex cricketers. You guys have enough batting / bowling talent to more than put it past England or even current weakened Australian team. Talent is one thing but management of talent at the higest level is another thing.the "first world" knows how to marshall talent and guide them to perfection.Sadly the sub continent world has neither the organisation nor the patience to think things clearly and move forward.

  • ny1703 ny1703

    1 Aug 2010, 5:24PM

    Rather than the pointless debate on KP's position surely Pakistan's continued test status demands more scrutiny, no? Mind boggles at their inconsistency!

  • ahsanib ahsanib

    1 Aug 2010, 5:30PM

    I said on some other comment thread that it would be very predictable, and very tragic, if Danish Kaneria is dropped from the team before the guy who caused all his troubles, Kamran Akmal.

    Well, I was wrong in my prediction. Kaneria hasn't been dropped from the team. He's been dropped from the ENTIRE SQUAD.

    Bunch of idiots.

  • neo786 neo786

    2 Aug 2010, 10:19AM

    Making K Akmal a vice-capt was a silly choice, considering his form in Oz just a few months back.....he deserves to be rested or dropped having cost us crucial moments in the last 6 months.

    With regards to Kaneria, after the 2005/6 season he's never looked too potent. Agreed he could have had more wickets in Oz if it were not for Akmal and possibly 1 guaranteed in the 1st Inns, but his overall bowling (length and penetration) didn't suggest more chances would be coming his way in the 3 tests this summer.

    If you compare him with another top class spinner, none of them has played the amount of games in county cricket like he has for Essex in the last few years. Technically you become a little lazy, as you compensate your natural technique for additional/necessary workload - he hasn't kept fresh or helped himself.

    Having played in England for so many years, he didn't show any of that experience in a relatively inexperienced line-up.......Akmal hasn't helped but isn't the main downfall for Kaneria as a potent bowler.

    Younis has clearly not apologised to Ijaz Butt, in a country, where power is everything....i'm not sure what Younis is trying to achieve? Though he might be making an honourable stand but to what end.......in a country where nepotism is rife, surely, saying 'sorry shouldn't be the hardest words'.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Sportblog weekly archives

Jul 2010
M T W T F S S

Our selection of best buys

Lender Initial rate
First Direct 2.99% More
ING Direct 2.89% More
First Direct 2.29% More
Name BT Rate BT Period
NatWest Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum 0% 16 mths More
Barclaycard Platinum 0% 15 mths More
Provider Typical APR
Sainsbury's Personal Loan 7.8% More
Provider AER
ING DIRECT 2.75% More
BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES 2.75% More
HALIFAX 2.60% More

Latest news on guardian.co.uk