(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Queen's speech debate: David Cameron attacks Labour for leaving UK in 'appalling mess'

Prime minister adopts combative tone as he rounds on previous government for leaving Britain with deficit bigger than that of Greece

George Osborne, David Cameron and William Hague in the Commons after the state opening of parliament

George Osborne, David Cameron and William Hague in the Commons after the state opening of parliament today. Photograph: PA

David Cameron used his first major speech at the Commons dispatch box today to attack the former Labour government for leaving the country in "an appalling mess".

Speaking in the Commons after this morning's Queen's speech, the prime minister adopted a combative tone as he began his address by rounding on Labour for leaving the country with a deficit bigger than that of crisis-hit Greece.

Cameron more than once referred to the handover note left to his ministers by Liam Byrne, the former chief secretary to the Treasury, who quipped that there was "no money left".

The prime minister's comments followed acting Labour leader Harriet Harman's response to the Queen's speech, in which she outlined how Labour planned an "effective" opposition role following the monarch's unveiling of the coalition government's 18-month legislative programme earlier today.

Based on the principles of "freedom, fairness and responsibility", the programme includes plans for a wholesale reform of schools, a shake-up of the welfare system and measures to "accelerate" the reduction of the budget deficit.

Cameron took to the dispatch box to quip that there was "something missing" from her speech: "Not one word of apology for the appalling mess that has been left in this country. Nothing to say about leaving Britain with a deficit that is bigger than Greece's. Not a single idea for getting to grips with it. Until they learn what they got so badly wrong I'm not sure people are going to listen to them again."

The prime minister said the note from Byrne was "13 words that sum up 13 years of complete cavalier arrogance with the taxpayers' money".

He rounded on David Blunkett, the former cabinet minister and MP for Sheffield Brightside, when challenged on how the new government's decision to scrap child trust funds for poorer children squared with the coalition's commitment to fairness and social responsibility. In a nod to the many millionaires in the cabinet, Blunkett asked if it was fair for a government that was "asset rich" to take away funds from those who were "asset poor".

Cameron fired back that the decision was Labour's fault: "You broke the nation so badly that it's schemes like this that can't be continued with."

Labour meanwhile had the novel experience of sitting on the opposition benches for the first time in 13 years in the Queen's speech debate.

Harman promised "effective" opposition to the government's legislative plans as she poured scorn on the coalition forged between Cameron and Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader and deputy prime minister.

Labour's acting leader said that her party would not oppose for the sake of opposing during debate on the measures put forward by the Conservatives and Lib Dems.

But she warned that neither would the opposition "pull our punches" in showing where ministers are going wrong.

Harman mocked the coupling of the Conservatives and Lib Dems, just weeks after the two parties had set out manifestos made up of conflicting policies. She also suggested the leadership's backbenchers were sceptical about the alliance. "While the happy couple are enjoying the rose garden, the in-laws are saying they are just not right for each other."

Harman promised Labour's support for measures that would help to secure the economic recovery, endorsed waste-cutting measures and supported planned voting reforms. But she rounded on a number of proposals outlined today, including the plan to elect "individuals" to hold police forces to account.

She also made clear Labour's opposition to plans to change the law so that 55% of MPs – not just a plain majority – would be needed to bring down a government and trigger an election.

Harman added that it was "morally unacceptable" to cut the number of parliamentary seats and redraw constituency boundaries on the basis of an electoral register "from which three and a half million people are missing".

Harman concluded by saying that the new government had a "great privilege and a heavy duty".

Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrat MP for Southwark North and Bermondsey, asked Cameron for an assurance that "his government" would do better than Labour in building council housing and affordable housing.

Cameron joked to the MP, regarded as being on the left wing of the Liberal Democcrats: "I hope before long he will be referring to it as "'our government' rather than 'his government'," before giving the requested assurance.

On international affairs, Cameron committed the government to the military mission in Afghanistan. In comments that appeared to override claims by his defence secretary, Liam Fox, that Britain was merely in the country for national security reasons, Cameron said: "This is a vital year for Afghanistan's future. We have had a troop surge in southern Afghanistan; there are now about 44,000 American forces fighting alongside around 9,000 British soldiers. What we need now is a political surge with more effective and accountable government, a reformed Afghan police force and proper reconciliation at the centre. This government will play a leading role in helping to bring that about."

Cameron also made clear he intended to increase the pressure on Iran amid evidence of Tehran's intention to acquire a nuclear bomb.

"For the last six years we have pursued a twin-track policy offering engagement but being prepared to apply pressure. I believe it is time to ratchet up that pressure and the timetable is short. This government has a clear objective to ensure stronger UN and EU sanctions against Iran."

He said measures ought to include restrictions on trade finance, asset freezing and action against banks holding funds for the regime in Tehran.

The new government was also given notice by the Commons Speaker, John Bercow, that key statements by ministers should be made to the house "before they are made elsewhere".

"If they do otherwise, then I, and I'm sure the house, will expect to hear explanations and apologies as necessary," Bercow said.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • salamandertome salamandertome

    25 May 2010, 5:31PM

    Its the rule of thumb that every incoming administration blames the previous one for as long as it can. This becomes less and less credible over time, until a point is reached where a majority of the electorate no longer believe it and want 'change'. They then in all likelihood get a new administration which blames the previous one for as long as it can...

    And thats the 'new' politics, I imagine?

  • teaandchocolate teaandchocolate

    25 May 2010, 5:32PM

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, Mr Angry, La di blah blah.

    Now. Who leaked the Queen's speech? And why?

    Which tories would not go into the Lords and Big Society, where? What? How?

    Methinks your coalition has a tottering look about it.

  • olderiamthelessiknow olderiamthelessiknow

    25 May 2010, 5:32PM

    He would say that wouldn't he.

    The worse he makes it out to be the more he can get on with his ideological bent to reduce the state and throwing people out of work in the process (just a side effect). Shortsighted and guaranteed to take us into depression.

    We are not Greece. No yet about it.

  • ByJingo ByJingo

    25 May 2010, 5:35PM

    Are we in danger of forgetting that the fundamental reason why we are in such a mess is that the banks failed, which caused a recession, and the government had to bail them out with tax-payers money.

    Yes, Labour could have been more thrifty during the good times. But we need to hold the banks to account, and get some contributions from them to sort out the mess.

  • focomo focomo

    25 May 2010, 5:36PM

    I remember Labour blaming the Conservatives for the awful mess they inherited in 1997. No doubt whoever takes over from the Lib-Cons will say the same thing.

    As someone once said, running the country is too important to be left to politicians.

  • ado16 ado16

    25 May 2010, 5:37PM

    I look forward to the next great Post Office Battle. I'm sorry if it sounds thick, but I find it rather amusing that the Post Office worked better when it had more Post Offices,more local non electronic sorting offices, more trains and more blokes on bicycles than it does today - yet they and Labour keep banging on about "Modernisation". Methinks for modernisation we should read "Complete Privatisation". Not the pretend privatisation that they're talking about but all out full blown sell it all off to the lowest bidder (as usual), completely botched privatisation that leaves the public with no say in how it's run any more and lots of lovely profit for some foreign owned behemoth.

  • Iestyni Iestyni

    25 May 2010, 5:38PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • sneekyboy sneekyboy

    25 May 2010, 5:38PM

    Cameron more than once referred to the handover note left to his ministers by Liam Byrne, the former chief secretary to the Treasury, who quipped that there was "no money left".

    I think Liam Byrne should be the next Labour Leader. I mean at least hes honest!

  • JButcher JButcher

    25 May 2010, 5:38PM

    Looks like we're in for another round of blaming the oposition rather than actually doing anything constructive.

    I think most people have had enough of all that bullshit by now.

  • angryhungry angryhungry

    25 May 2010, 5:38PM

    Well I for one applaud Mr Cameron's inital efforts at reducing the appalling deficit caused by the Labour-initiated global recession.

    Those bloody newborns don't need £250.

  • Reflexive Reflexive

    25 May 2010, 5:40PM

    A tottering look indeed, teaandchocolate. Did you notice the dissent from the Liberal benches whilst Cameron was speaking. This coalition, propped up by jokes about the Cameron-Clegg marriage (even Dave got in on that one), is a half-dead ghost. Vince Cable is the living face of it...

  • marcs013 marcs013

    25 May 2010, 5:40PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • TommerS TommerS

    25 May 2010, 5:41PM

    The apparant "mess" today is incomparable to that in 1997. And while the Tories spent their last shot in government destroying working class Britain, and then not much else, Labour made the country fairer and more prosperous. Mistakes were made, but, as ByJingo rightly points out, the financial crisis wasn't one of them. Brown could have been thriftier, but the massive spending he did went to rebuilding the nation, improving education, the health sector, policing etc.

    Let's see what happens in 5 years.

  • rednorth rednorth

    25 May 2010, 5:42PM

    David Freud the banker hired by New Labour to come up with slave labour welfare plans for the sick, now hired as a minister by those really nice Liberal folk to grind the sick and the poor into the dust.

  • joshthedog joshthedog

    25 May 2010, 5:43PM

    Normal politics are resumed... now we all know what to expect next: ideologically driven Tory policy leaving the country more divided with greater iniquity. And they are starting from a low base.

    The coalition looks shakey. Vince Cable sounds unconvinced, and I wonder how much he will tolerate before resigning with a withering analysis in his speech.

    It is, however, making QT on Thursday nights excellent viewing as Tory and LD members of the coalition are shoe-horned together and made to agree with each other. Heseltine and Hughes didn't like it much, and May and Campbell didn't fair much better either.

  • LoveisEternal LoveisEternal

    25 May 2010, 5:43PM

    Brian Haw

    arrested for 'suspicion of obstructing a Police Officer' just before Queen's Speech

    'Obstructing a Police Officer' is a charge notoriously open to abuse. 'Suspicion of Obstructing a PO' could mean absolutely anything. It looks like intimidation.

    the charge and timing of this arrest doesn't bode well for our civil liberties under this Gov.

  • InebriatEd InebriatEd

    25 May 2010, 5:43PM

    You know what, I'm sure G Brown and A Blair took over from the worst government finances in istory, and the worst wealth disparity in history when they took over in 1997, and that was without two world wars and one world cup... sorry, I mean two world wars and one world recession

  • marcs013 marcs013

    25 May 2010, 5:43PM

    Blaming the previous lot worked for Labour for 13 years.
    Blaming Thatcher for everything still works for many CiFers too almost 20 years after she left office.

  • MingoSloan MingoSloan

    25 May 2010, 5:45PM

    salamandertome
    25 May 2010, 5:31PM
    Its the rule of thumb that every incoming administration blames the previous one for as long as it can. This becomes less and less credible over time, until a point is reached where a majority of the electorate no longer believe it and want 'change'. They then in all likelihood get a new administration which blames the previous one for as long as it can...

    Except it's kind of irrefutable economic mess this time, rather than the 1997 Carry On Tories in retrospect quaint sleaze.

    Labour deliberately say the same thing to deceive and to water down the accusation when it is made honestly.

  • nsandersen nsandersen

    25 May 2010, 5:45PM

    She also made clear Labour's opposition to plans to change the law so that 55% of MPs ? not just a plain majority ? would be needed to bring down a government and trigger an election.

    50% for a no-confidence vote and 55% to hold an election early.

  • TomHarrison TomHarrison

    25 May 2010, 5:46PM

    scarponi

    25 May 2010, 5:36PM

    What a cheap shot. Ordinary people have no way of checking the truth
    of this--so it's a bit of Labour-bashing propaganda. Shame on you, David.

    You've never so much as glanced at the financial pages have you?

  • jforbes jforbes

    25 May 2010, 5:46PM

    He would say that wouldn't he. The worse a picture he paints the more excuses he has when it all goes wrong.

    Interesting to see the assurances on social housing when they have just cut the budget.

  • quaere quaere

    25 May 2010, 5:47PM

    I wonder how Cameron would have dealt with the financial collapse. Unfortunately the last government had to turn private debt into public debt saving Cameron's and Osborne?s old Etonian banking friends...I remember Kissinger talking about morality of making the less financial fortunate pay for the more financial fortunate mistakes...

  • marcs013 marcs013

    25 May 2010, 5:47PM

    Before the election the consensus on CiF was one of overwhelming support for a PR system. Now we actually have a coalition many CiFers are screeching that it looks shakey. Obviously coalitions can only work if they are CiF approved ones, i.e., not including the Tories.

  • antonio678 antonio678

    25 May 2010, 5:48PM

    I wonder, rhetorically, how many more morons are going to blame this mess on the previous administration rather than hold the banks to account in order to protect a blinkered ideology? Truly pathetic.

  • tobeeornot tobeeornot

    25 May 2010, 5:48PM

    Like Brown, Cameron will always carry the albatross of being an unelected prime minister hung around his neck, and for that reason he will never be at ease with himself nor carry himself with any strength. Hence the patronising slaps on Clegg's back all the time and the petulant outbursts like today. Your'e in power, mate - but not really...

  • mac64 mac64

    25 May 2010, 5:48PM

    That's it Cameron you bastard, wash your hands of any responsibility of what you are about to inflict on the poorest in society. New Labour were awful, but it would've been no different under a Tory govt, with their virtually blanket support for the Iraq war, neo-liberal agenda and noses buried in the expenses trough.

    If the deficit is bigger than that of Greece, then we need a revolt bigger than that of Greece.

  • MingoSloan MingoSloan

    25 May 2010, 5:48PM

    jforbes
    25 May 2010, 5:46PM
    He would say that wouldn't he. The worse a picture he paints the more excuses he has when it all goes wrong.

    It has already gone wrong, even the heavily left-laden EU sees that.

  • christelle christelle

    25 May 2010, 5:49PM

    Where's Aneurin Bevan when you want him?
    When I voted Labour in 1997, I certainly didn't vote for a career politician. I thought I was voting for education, healthcare, housing and a decent living wage for all. That's optimism for you. Instead, education, healthcare, pensions and afordable housing that the baby boomers have enjoyed has all been eroded away. Do we honestly have politicians that care about and represent ordinary people?
    Labour hasn't left this country an appalling mess. Decades of selfishness have.

  • MingoSloan MingoSloan

    25 May 2010, 5:50PM

    mac64
    25 May 2010, 5:48PM
    That's it Cameron you bastard, wash your hands of any responsibility of what you are about to inflict on the poorest in society. New Labour were awful, but it would've been no different under a Tory govt, with their virtually blanket support for the Iraq war, neo-liberal agenda and noses buried in the expenses trough.

    Typical socialist tactic, fantasise about what the evil nasty Tories under the bed could have done rather than what they actually say and do.

  • marcs013 marcs013

    25 May 2010, 5:50PM

    @Londoneratlarge

    Headline really sums it up nicely. 13 years of incompetent tax and waste. Finally over.... feels a bit like waking from a long, bad dream.

    And what also struck me the other day is that finally with some decent immigration policies on the way we have a chance of getting our country back too!

    Also Cameron's already put the Germans in the picture that we won't be kowtowing in Europe like Brown used to either.

  • mac64 mac64

    25 May 2010, 5:52PM

    Clegg has been utterly exposed for the Cameron-clone that he has always been. It's astonishing to think that so many were fooled by him in the TV debates. Harder still to believe that most Lib Dem voters seem to think their party is doing the right thing. If I was a Lib Dem (a highly unlikely scenario) i would be livid. Well, I wouldn't be a Lib Dem anymore.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Find your MP

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed