(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

UK election results: Clegg and Cameron have first shot at forming coalition, says Brown

PM declares desire to form alliance with Liberal Democrats should their talks with Conservatives fail and holds out prospect of PR

  • guardian.co.uk, Friday 7 May 2010 14.21 BST
Link to this video


Gordon Brown today accepted that the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats had the first chance to establish a coalition but declared his desire to form a coalition with Nick Clegg – offering a referendum on proportional representation in a bid to trump the Tories.

In an acknowledgement of the weak position he now faces, Brown said he would be "willing to see any of the party leaders".

Speaking from the steps of Downing Street he also made clear his offer to the Liberal Democrats – shared economic policies and a referendum on proportional representation.

But he also signalled that he would remain prime minister and that his cabinet was carrying on the work of government in the meantime. Alistair Darling will take part in a video conference with EU finance ministers today to address the economic crisis in Greece.

The hung parliament has left the parties manoeuvring for control of the government today. On the basis of current results, Labour has 255 seats, Liberal Democrats 55 and the Tories 307 – just short of the 326 needed for an overall majority.

Cameron must now chose whether to attempt a minority government or some form of coalition with the Liberal Democrats. He is expected to make a statement shortly. Clegg has indicated he will enter talks with Cameron first.

Addressing reporters outside No 10, Brown said: "On the critical question on the formation of a government that can command a parliamentary majority I have of course seen the statements of other party leaders. I understand and completely respect the position of Mr Clegg in stating that he wishes to make contact with the leader of the Conservative party.

"As you know we already have in place mechanisms and facilities that will give the political parties any civil service support they need. Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg should clearly be entitled to take as much time as they see necessary.

"For my part I should make clear that I would be willing to see any of the party leaders. Clearly if the discussions between Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg come to nothing then I would of course be prepared to discuss with Mr Clegg the areas where there may be some measure of agreement between our two parties.

"There are two areas in particular where such discussion would be likely to focus. The first is the plan to ensure continuing economic stability where there is substantial common ground. And the plan to carry through far reaching political reforms including changes to the voting system."

He added: "What all of us should be mindful of is the imperative of strong stable government and for that to be formed with the authority to tackle the challenges ahead and one that can command support in parliament. It is with this in mind that all of us should be facing the times ahead.

"I understand, as I know my fellow party leaders do, that people do not like the uncertainty or want it to be prolonged. We live however in a parliamentary democracy; the outcome has been delivered by the electorate. It is our responsibility to make it work for the national good."

A statement from the Conservatives earlier suggested Cameron would seek a "strong and stable" coalition with "broad" support indicating some form of coalition is on the cards. Clegg today said that the Conservatives should have the first chance to form a government after securing the highest share of votes and seats in the general election.

Conceding that the election had been "disappointing" for his party, the Lib Dem leader made it clear that voting reform would be the condition of any decision to back a coalition.

His suggestion that the Tories should have the first opportunity to form a government runs contrary to constitutional convention, which dictates that the sitting prime minister has that entitlement.

But with the Lib Dem performance falling well below expectations and Labour receiving its worst drubbing since the second world war, the prospects of a Lib-Lab coalition are receding unless a Con-Lib Dem coalition first fails.

Brown today triggered the constitutional mechanism to establish a new government from the hung parliament, deploying teams of civil servants to the opposition parties to support negotiations aimed at forming a coalition.

Amid vastly different regional swings, the election results showed strong Labour resilience outside the south, and the Lib Dems badly underperformed against the euphoric expectations of only a week ago.

The former home secretary Jacqui Smith was the most high-profile victim of the expenses scandal, losing her ultra-marginal Redditch seat to the Tories by 6,000 votes.

Other Labour casualties included another ex-home secretary, Charles Clarke, and the ministers Vera Baird, Mike O'Brien, Bill Rammell and former minister Tony McNulty.

But the schools secretary, Ed Balls, narrowly held off a strong Tory challenge and declared: "People say New Labour is finished. New Labour is renewed tonight – we will fight on."

Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, said the people had spoken, but "we don't know quite what they have said".


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • darky darky

    7 May 2010, 2:32PM

    Gordon, go now please. You were never elected in the first place and this country needs someone to sort out the economy and redress the 870bn deficit that you oversaw. Good riddance.

  • scubadoc scubadoc

    7 May 2010, 2:38PM

    Despite darky's comment, that statement seems admirably clear. Perhaps I'm missing the undercurrent of self-interest that I've come to expect from politicians...

    ... and I remain of the firmly held opinion that no government would have avoided the economic mess, unless a radically different course had been charted over the last 30 years.

  • frenchletter frenchletter

    7 May 2010, 2:50PM

    darky has written:
    Gordon, go now please. You were never elected in the first place

    This is not true. Brown is an MP and, therefore, has been elected to Parliament.
    In the UK you do not elect prime ministers.
    Many people seem unable to grasp this quite basic fact

  • Carolingian Carolingian

    7 May 2010, 3:02PM

    Yes, Gordon was never actually elected but Blair was elected in 2005 on the express assumption that he would sod off soon after he got his 10 years in power.

    A Lib-Lab coalition would give us the best of the economics to ride this tidal wave of shit and the opportunity for voting reform that would actually make everyones vote (likely including the BNP, sadly, depending on how high/low the PR threshold is set) actually count.

    Cameron can't promise reform, Brown can (but will hopefully get pushed out afterwards).

    Interesting times indeed.

  • Benulek Benulek

    7 May 2010, 3:05PM

    darky has written:
    Gordon, go now please. You were never elected in the first place

    This is not true. Brown is an MP and, therefore, has been elected to Parliament.
    In the UK you do not elect prime ministers.
    Many people seem unable to grasp this quite basic fact

    It never ceases to amaze me just how often it is necessary to reiterate this. You can usually silence these people by asking them to list the countries in which prime ministers are directly elected.

  • TwoSwords TwoSwords

    7 May 2010, 3:16PM

    Clegg shouldn't and won't enter any coalition.

    He should offer time limited confidence and supply for a referendum on electoral reform to Cameron and if Cameron doesn't bite give it to Brown.

  • nattybumpo nattybumpo

    7 May 2010, 3:39PM

    Camerons speech was the most subtle and intelligent I've heard in years.
    This is no time for ideology or prejudice.
    This is the time for action!!!
    I'm a big Lib Dem supporter and we can help by doing something now.
    BY WORKING TOGETHER!!!!!
    THE ELECTIONS OVER.... SO LET'S GET ON WITH IT PLEASE?

  • nattybumpo nattybumpo

    7 May 2010, 3:43PM

    If George Osbourne can listen to someone like me, I can listen to what he has to say.
    Even after all the bad things I've called him...
    Maybe It's time for a real change.....

  • Chocolatelover Chocolatelover

    7 May 2010, 3:46PM

    I do not think that a hung parliament is a bad option at all. I think that politics has got so brutal nowadays that coalitions will encourage perties to work together and hopefully get the best bits of each of their policies. I just hope Clegg goes for the one that he will work best with.

  • Shacfan Shacfan

    7 May 2010, 3:47PM

    StuffThePigeon, a better portmanteau of Clegg and Brown is surely Clown.

    Onemorename, surely under the present economic circumstances a btter option would be Begg?

  • LupoUK LupoUK

    7 May 2010, 4:45PM

    So Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, said the people had spoken, but we don't know quite what they have said".

    National Health, economy, employment, immigration, taxation, government spending, MP's expenses, THE WAR on terror (that has actually increased terrorism within this country). Ring any bells? Ed, it is really quite clear, the majority of voters feel let down by your party and would prefer your government to depart with grace..... maybe you need hearing aids?

  • Robbothedoc Robbothedoc

    7 May 2010, 5:05PM

    @frenchletter:

    darky has written:
    Gordon, go now please. You were never elected in the first place

    This is not true. Brown is an MP and, therefore, has been elected to Parliament.
    In the UK you do not elect prime ministers.
    Many people seem unable to grasp this quite basic fact

    Firstly may I say I'm not Labour and have only ever once voted Labour, and that was when I first got the vote at 18.

    However, it isn't true that Brown didn't have a mandate. At the last election it was patently obvious that Blair wouldn't serve a full term and that Brown was almost certain to succeed him. The Tories even had a slogan - 'vote Blair, get Brown' - thus inadvertently ensuring that Brown had a mandate if anyone doubted it. There would only have been a doubt about a mandate if Brown had faailed to secure the succession and another politician had become Labour leader.

    So statements about the validity of Brown's mandate are as disingenous as the claim now that Labour and the Lib/Dems have no mandate to form a coalition when together they polled about 16% more than the Tories and virtually everyone who voted Lib/Dem would have considered the possibility that the party might have to set up a working arrangement with either Labour or the Tories.

  • romannosejob romannosejob

    7 May 2010, 5:26PM

    Ed, it is really quite clear, the majority of voters feel let down by your party

    however, the majority couldn't make up their mind who they wanted instead.

    maybe if this was like big brother and we were voting someone out then your comment would be hunky dory, but it's not like big brother, no matter how many people treat it as such.

  • injapan injapan

    7 May 2010, 6:18PM

    Some offer of compromise.

    Not a single concession or hint of concession - basically just listing the few similarities between the two parties' existing manifestos, and Cameron's not willing to change a thing because they got 'the bulk of the support' or whatever he said in the video.

    Can he be reminded of the fact 7 million voted Lib Dem to the Tories' 11 million, and perhaps make compromises accordingly?

  • sickboy47 sickboy47

    7 May 2010, 7:07PM

    Clegg really is in a mess, isn't he?

    Cameron will not compromise on PR vs FPTP, so if Clegg goes with the Tories, he get's nothing except tarring with the Tory brush, which I don't think will go down well with his party or supporters.

    If he goes with Labour, he gets promises but the coalition will not hold long enough to pass the legislation needed to change the voting system.

    If he does nothing, he stands to be accused of missing the Libs best opportunity for a century.

    Damned if you do, do or don't.

  • mbowasport mbowasport

    7 May 2010, 7:12PM

    This is a coup on Mr Gordon Brown who remains a victim of the deplorable British media onslaught. Despite their large gains, Cameron and his Conservatives have been rejected by the British voters; voters have also decapitated Labour's hold on power BUT constitutionally the British people have sent out a clear message: We still want Mr Brown in No.10. Constitutionally therefore, anything other than Brown trying to form a new stable government at this moment is tantamount to an African coup. How can Britain possibly tell countries like my Uganda - under a dictatorship - to respect constitutions when they can't uphold theirs? Mugabe (Zimbabwe), Gaddafi (Libya), Museveni (Uganda) must be laughing now. SHAME UPON YOU, BRITAIN! SHAME ON THE MURDOCH MEDIA EMPIRE - theSUN and theTIMES.

  • ReluctantRioter ReluctantRioter

    7 May 2010, 7:15PM

    I sincerely hope that Clegg is just being a shrewd politician and playing "hard-to-get" with Brown so that he can secure some extremely favourable terms for a coalition. Teaming up with the Tories would be a huge ideological blunder - Clegg should sacrifice this one instance of loyaly to the idea of democracy (ie Cameron did get the most votes) for the entire democratic process in the UK as a whole. People may not want Gordon, but they do want whole-scale reform!

  • Sarahtheoneandonly Sarahtheoneandonly

    7 May 2010, 7:38PM

    Well surprise, surprise. Nick Clegg and David Cameron could get into bed. Who would have thought it, honestly shut your eyes, listen to them both talking and it is hard to tell them apart.

    I think it is commendable that Brown is willing to give them the first shot at forming government. I know of people who did vote Lib Dem to keep the Tories out and in my constituency it didn't work (went back to Tory after 13 years of Lib Dem). Maybe that will get a few people thinking about their voting tactics.

    One thing this election may have highlighted though is this: have we got to the stage where three party politics cannot work? Two's company but three is a crowd...

  • Quicknstraight Quicknstraight

    7 May 2010, 7:58PM

    mbowasport:

    Quite how you manage to reach the ridiculous conclusion that the election results are a sign the British people want Brown for PM is a mystery to me. Labour lost a huge number of seats, the Tories gained a huge number and the LibDems went nowhere.

    How the hell is that a sign the people want Brown? If people wanted Brown, there wouldn't be a hung parliament, would there? They would have voted Labour back in if they did want Brown again.

    And for those who nit-pick and say that Brown didn't need electing as PM, that is playing fast and loose with what should be honest and above-board politics. If Brown had stood as leader in 2005, not Blair, would he have returned a majority? Quite possibly not.

    Labour have no moral right to have first go at a coalition, no matter what the conventions are. They polled only 29% of the vote. That's 29% of a 70% turnout. Or about 20% of the population eligible to vote.

    The constitutional conventions are asinine. Clearly, the party with the most seats should have the first chance to form a government.

  • osisgood osisgood

    7 May 2010, 8:08PM

    Well Clegg might need to remember who went to a fee paying day school with the same fees as George Osborne's- Osborne being called "oik" for this by David Cameron.

    So Clegg is Cameron's new oik in the making.

    Maybe it's time for the men in the grey open-toed sandals to have a word with Hubristic Nick, the man who blew it when he went out and about without his designated adult minder (Vince Cable)

  • Treviscoe Treviscoe

    8 May 2010, 11:10AM

    If Gordon goes right now and you get a Lib-Lab coalition under PR, all you'd get is yet another unelected Labour leader and the problem would begin anew.

    If it had to happen though I suppose Alan Johnson is the best bet. The odds are we'll be seeing another election before the year is out, so it doesn't matter that much if we have an interim leader for a while.

  • Treviscoe Treviscoe

    8 May 2010, 11:30AM

    One more thing; there's an easy way out for Gordon Brown IMO. As part of his offer to Nick Clegg he should tell him there'll be a Labour leadership election within 2 weeks of a Queen's speech (as someone said above) and then offer himself as one of the candidates. It's no different from what John Major did when he was facing a challenge within his own party in the 1990's, and similar to Thatcher making way to Major in 1990.

    He'll almost certainly lose, but at least he'll go with some scrap of dignity left. And of course a commitment to PR would need to be part of the package.

  • faye83 faye83

    8 May 2010, 5:55PM

    Clegg will lose a lot of respect if he joins the Tories, the majority of people who voted for him disagree with most of his policies. He should form with Labour.

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Find your constituency

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

    • Dubai
    • £14.99 with free UK delivery

Guardian Jobs

UK

Browse all jobs

USA

Browse all jobs

  • Loading jobs...

jobs by Indeed job search