(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

General election 2010: Surge in voter registration makes election outcome more volatile

Guardian survey reveals significant increase in the electorate, especially among young people, which could see 6 May turnout soar

Postal votes being counted in Bradford in 2006.

Postal votes being counted in Bradford in 2006. Photograph: John Giles/PA

The number of people registering to vote has increased markedly, adding a new generation of voters to the electorate and making the outcome of the election even more volatile, according to a survey of marginal constituencies conducted by the Guardian.

Figures collected from more than 20 of the most marginal areas following Tuesday's deadline to register to vote indicate across-the-board increases in the electorate, compared with the last general election, suggesting that turnout could soar on 6 May.

In one area, the increase is as high as 17%, and there are also indications of a dramatic surge in people requesting postal votes.

The volume of postal vote requests doubled in some areas compared with 2005, putting electoral administration systems under pressure and raising new concerns about postal voting fraud and the extent to which parties are manipulating the system to boost their vote.

Candidates in three separate areas told the Guardian that postal votes were central to their campaign. One said they had redoubled their efforts to sign people up for postal votes as the margins between the parties tightened and the prospect of a hung parliament and a second election this year grew ever more likely.

The Liberal Democrats could benefit disproportionately from the boost in numbers and postal votes. The Electoral Commission has said that those expressing an interest in registering were disproportionately in the youngest age bracket of 18-24 – the same group that recent polls show backing the Lib Dems. Previous trends show that people who use a postal vote send it quickly after they receive it meaning that millions of people will be voting in the next week when the party is still high in the polls on the back of the first TV debate.

The Guardian approached 25 local authorities to request figures on voter registration and postal votes after Tuesday's deadline for applications. Nearly every response revealed an increase in both figures compared with the 2005 election after being adjusted for boundary changes.

A spokesman for Wandsworth council, which covers three constituencies, including the marginal seat of Battersea, described a "terrific surge" in applications. There had been predictions that interest in voting would fall following the expenses saga. But today's figures suggest that reforms to the registration system and possibly the tight nature of this election could be countering that effect.

In Sittingbourne and Sheppey the electorate increased by 17% after adjustments for boundary changes and postal votes went from 6,429 in 2005 to 9,529 this week. In Crawley, registrations have gone up by 1.2%, but postal votes by 11% to 12,076. Ceredigion, which had a very minor boundary change, saw an 11% increase in registrations to 59,607 and postal votes more than double from 2,954 to 6,732.

Registrations were all but unchanged in Edinburgh South since 2005, but postal votes had increased by 60%. Brian Brown, head of electoral administration for Edinburgh South, said they had to extend deadlines to send postal votes out in order to cope with the surplus. "We've had a significant surge in late applications," he said.

Barnet council, which covers three constituencies, including the marginal Finchley & Golders Green, reported 12% more registrations and 63% more postal votes. Brighton council, which also covers three constituencies, had a 2% increase in registrations compared with the last election and 40% increase in postal votes.

Paul Holloway, head of electoral services Brighton and Hove city council, said: "We have seen a healthy surge in the numbers of residents making contact to ensure they are registered to vote... we have averaged around 2,000 alterations to the register every month and the post we receive recently has tripled.

"Our campaigns have also targeted students and just yesterday a group
of university students came into the office with a whole box load of
registration forms."

Some 500,000 registration forms were downloaded from the Electoral Commission website and 50,000 calls were made to a registration helpline. A survey of visitors to the website found that 40% were aged 18-24.

Jenny Watson, the chair of the Electoral Commission, said that increases in registrations followed major reforms of the system which allowed people to register in the first 11 days of the campaign whereas previously, people could only register up until the election was called. A new online system that allows people to download application forms has also made the system more user-friendly, she said.

Three candidates, whose constituencies were not covered in the survey, described how postal votes were central to their canvassing. One Labour candidate said: "Normally at this point we would consolidate and go back to core voters. But this time we are doing even more. We've got huge numbers of postal votes signed up – probably another 4,000.

"If they are voting Labour we want to know: 'Can you get there? Are you on holiday? How can we help?' We're going round the care homes because they are going to need a postal vote and we need them."

It is not illegal to encourage supporters to register for a vote, but political activists are not allowed to touch or handle voters' ballot papers. There is a national code of conduct to which the parties have signed up to prevent fraud, but some areas are supplementing that with even tougher guidelines.

In Kettering this year, one in four registered voters have requested a postal vote. David Cook, the chief executive of Kettering council and the acting returning officer, said: "Some years ago, highly publicised cases of fraud in other areas damaged confidence in postal voting. All the local party candidates, their respective agents and I came together to agree a local code to help further assure voters that the postal voting system was both convenient and safe."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • MohammedIsfahir MohammedIsfahir

    22 Apr 2010, 3:23PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • bugbeer bugbeer

    22 Apr 2010, 3:31PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • nattybumpo nattybumpo

    22 Apr 2010, 3:37PM

    This is excellent news. We live in a democracy with a feral right wing press.
    Todays attacks on Nick Clegg proves this!
    With proper voter empowerment we can tell Murdoch to place his tabloid somewhere where it couldn't possibly shine....

  • whathavetheydone whathavetheydone

    22 Apr 2010, 3:37PM

    Surely it's a case of a financial crisis triggering a constitutional crisis - or, more accurately, a constitutional upheaval. Hung parliament's and coalition negotiations are not crises.

    If something urgent needs to be done the parties will agree on an action while continuing to nail down other agreements.

  • gingerjon gingerjon

    22 Apr 2010, 3:37PM

    The ease with which postal vote fraud can be committed really needs to be addressed - likewise how easy it is to manipulate the electoral roll in the first place.

  • NeitherLeftNorRight NeitherLeftNorRight

    22 Apr 2010, 3:38PM

    The Bush brothers can obviously still learn a trick or 2.

    There will be many seats in which the difference in votes between the winner and the number 2 will be outstrpped significantly by the number of postal votes.

    It wuold be interesting to get some more detail on that candidate mentioned above who said:

    We've got huge numbers of postal votes signed up ? probably another 4,000.

    PS I'm very critical about the Guardian but here I very happily admit that this is excellent reporting and merits many follow-ups. May I suggest though that hihglighting libdems as potentially the biggest gainers of the postal phenomenon is bit cheeky given what happened in Glenrothes and a few labour candidate selections.

    A few links to other Guardian reports on postal doubts (you can find many from other sources but most readers here dismiss them as lies instantly - but may I sugest the Glenrothes report by the electoral commission that says that some of the counting tables were barred from proper view (apart from the register that went missing)):

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/08/craig-murray-general-election

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/23/labour-postal-voting-glasgow-north-east

  • Sipech Sipech

    22 Apr 2010, 3:43PM

    Still, in spite of this, it's depressing thought that the number of people who vote for Britain's Got Talent will probably still outstrip the general election.

  • bill9651 bill9651

    22 Apr 2010, 3:57PM

    I used to work as a Presiding Officer in the 1960's when we had the most secure voting system in the world. Back then election fraud was virtually unheard of.

    Because of this goverment we now have a postal ballot system worthy of a banana republic. The reported increase for postal ballots in the marginals is therefore deeply worrying.

  • straighttalkingjack straighttalkingjack

    22 Apr 2010, 4:03PM

    This DOES sound like very good news for the Libs.

    Tories scaremongering about a hung parliament, right wing press blowing the dog whistles and blathering about Nazis..... It's almost as if the Libs are - an - important - political - party!

    It's fascinating to watch the instant flip from "pretend they don't have any relevance" tactics to "smear and fear-monger" as the right suddenly realises it's got a fight on its hands. I'm really enjoying this.

    I'd like to think that the Mail and Telegraph campaigns are counter-productive. Is it possible that Lib supporters and potential Lib supporters don't much like these papers anyway and prefer an open-minded more rational approach to politics in general? Might this sort of tosh just drive more voters into the arms of the Libs? Or are they just trying to energise the dumb/rabidly-nationalistic/closed-minded base?

  • JayZed JayZed

    22 Apr 2010, 4:04PM

    Well, I applied for a postal vote because I'm going to be abroad on election day. No sinister ulterior motive, I promise. Not that my vote will count for anything in my super-safe constituency, thanks to our electoral system.

  • haardvark haardvark

    22 Apr 2010, 4:06PM

    Lets hope the Tories don't fiddle it as Desprate Dave will do anything

    Err, I think you'll find it's the followers of Gibbering Gordo who have form on postal vote fraud.

  • GGHorsman GGHorsman

    22 Apr 2010, 4:09PM

    bill9651

    I used to work as a Presiding Officer in the 1960's when we had the most secure voting system in the world. Back then election fraud was virtually unheard of.

    Because of this goverment we now have a postal ballot system worthy of a banana republic. The reported increase for postal ballots in the marginals is therefore deeply worrying.

    It's fascinating seeing the Tories getting in their excuses for failure this early. Shouldn't you really be waiting for the election before you start blaming the result on fraud? Incidentally, have you decided who'll be replacing Cameron?

  • Burgau205 Burgau205

    22 Apr 2010, 4:10PM

    I am a Conservative and am a nervous wreck. I am terrified of waking up to see Brown's smug face on April 7th at 10 Downing Street.

    I'll do myself in and you'll all be sorry.

  • ShoelessJoe ShoelessJoe

    22 Apr 2010, 4:12PM

    P.S I applied for a postal vote on Monday.

    Was thinking of doodling on it and posting it back.

    Now it is very clear a Lib Dem vote will give Murdoch and Dacre coronories, my decision has changed somewhat...

  • nyanza nyanza

    22 Apr 2010, 4:13PM

    The reported increase for postal ballots in the marginals is therefore deeply worrying.

    But the Guardian only requested data from marginals. If postal votes are up by the same degree everywhere then what's the big deal? Of course postal votes are on up the up everywhere - people are more mobile and living far more unpredictable lives today than ever before.

    And 40% of requests were from 18-24 years old? Again, so what? They're students away from home. If it wasn't so high in that narrow demographic group then that's the time to get scared!

    I'm still registered elsewhere to my current residence because I move around so much. Student life. I only cast one vote. Is that fraud, or me simply protecting myself from becoming disenfranchised?

  • NXile NXile

    22 Apr 2010, 4:20PM

    I'm actually a bit concerned about this.

    In the beginning I was all for Nick Clegg, but then I realised, success for him and the Liberals means a likely change to PR.

    Because, if we get PR, doesn't this mean that Ian Paisley and Alex Salmond (and possibly Nick Griffin and George Galloway) potentially get a veto over government policy?

    Is this really going to be better than a two-party system? Let alone fairer or more representative?

    Be careful what you wish for, kids.

  • regal regal

    22 Apr 2010, 4:26PM

    wait till these young students find out that clegg will be with browns policys,if the lib dems and new labour form a coalition,and their is a hung parliament,and new labour plan to make severe cuts on universitys.

  • KevinBoatang KevinBoatang

    22 Apr 2010, 4:27PM

    Why is this a dramatic surge? Most of them are 2%!

    And you don't even bother to question the serious issue of fraud due to postal voting, or even investigate what the cause of the 'dramatic surge' is.

  • Hooloovoo Hooloovoo

    22 Apr 2010, 4:27PM

    Quote:
    Still, in spite of this, it's depressing thought that the number of people who vote for Britain's Got Talent will probably still outstrip the general election.

    This isn't true, though it's often repeated. In the X Factor final, 8 million people voted. In the last general election, 27 million people voted.

  • ProvisionalName ProvisionalName

    22 Apr 2010, 4:31PM

    Burgau205:
    I am a Conservative and am a nervous wreck. I am terrified of waking up to see Brown's smug face on April 7th at 10 Downing Street.

    I'll do myself in and you'll all be sorry.

    No we won't.

  • gingerjon gingerjon

    22 Apr 2010, 4:34PM

    Because, if we get PR, doesn't this mean that Ian Paisley and Alex Salmond (and possibly Nick Griffin and George Galloway) potentially get a veto over government policy?

    Because no Tory or Labour governments at any point have had to compromise with, say, unionist parties in Ulster to get legislation through.

  • bromley bromley

    22 Apr 2010, 4:34PM

    Because, if we get PR, doesn't this mean that Ian Paisley and Alex Salmond (and possibly Nick Griffin and George Galloway) potentially get a veto over government policy?

    No it doesn't! All those people you mention would be lucky to have 10% of the Westminster seats between them.

    I am delighted with the late registration surge. A high turnout would be excellent. The number of postal votes is a bit of a concern. There has been fraud in the past. Postal votes should be published as sub-totals. That way any significant divergence between postal and 'normal' votes will show up and can be investigated.

  • ShoelessJoe ShoelessJoe

    22 Apr 2010, 4:36PM

    Let's just put the Tory fear of a hung parliament in perspective:

    You have to go back to 1979 to find the last General Election where a combined Labour/Liberal vote did not exceed 50% of the popular vote and yet that combination would still have been enough to keep Thatcher out.

    Worse for the Tories you have to go back to 1955 to find a General Election where the combined Labour/Liberal vote was bettered by the Tories.

    No wonder Kenneth Clarke fears a hung parliament and it's nothing to do with the markets. It's to do with the Lib Dems getting their aim of PR and the Tories NEVER being in government in the UK again

  • Maitaimik Maitaimik

    22 Apr 2010, 4:37PM

    @shoelessJoe

    P.S I applied for a postal vote on Monday.

    Was thinking of doodling on it and posting it back.

    Now it is very clear a Lib Dem vote will give Murdoch and Dacre coronories, my decision has changed somewhat...

    Will that be #nickcleggsfault

  • sldsmkd sldsmkd

    22 Apr 2010, 4:37PM

    @NXile

    Because, if we get PR, doesn't this mean that Ian Paisley and Alex Salmond (and possibly Nick Griffin and George Galloway) potentially get a veto over government policy?

    Just because you don't like their views doesn't make them irrelevant, like it or not they do represent how a portion of the electorate feel and thus should have a voice in parliament. We'll also have a larger UKIP and Green representation too.

    I for one am pretty happy with this, and would expect to see a swing towards decisions being made on consensus & horse trading - as opposed to the whipped tribalism we currently have.

  • Eachran Eachran

    22 Apr 2010, 4:37PM

    6th May.

    Birthday of Sigmund Freud, Orson Welles and Tony Blair. Or do you prefer Rudolph Valentino or even Robespierre.

    I find this election very erotic with all its surges. I bet everyone will be exhausted come election night.

    But get out there everyone : vote for Blair. Show the rest of the world the values on which Great Britain stands tall.

  • quelter quelter

    22 Apr 2010, 4:38PM

    I registered for the first time in a while because

    1. it was easy to download the form

    2. the form assured me of the very few things that my data could be used for, all of which were fairly benign

  • hopefulcyclist hopefulcyclist

    22 Apr 2010, 4:46PM

    The last thing this country needs is a contested election result, where so many marginals are decided by suspicious postal vote surges that the entire thing ends up in the courts like the US 2000 election.

    The markets would use the uncertainty as an excuse to sink the pound and trigger a government bond crisis, so forcing through yet more monetarist policies as we are bailed out by the IMF, only two years after we tax payers bailed out the banks who would be taking us to the cleaners - again.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Find your constituency

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Last updated less than one minute ago

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Guardian Jobs

UK

Browse all jobs

USA

Browse all jobs

  • Loading jobs...

jobs by Indeed job search